Family structure and childhood mental disorders: new findings from Australia
Many children now live in non-traditional families—including one-parent, blended, and step families. While a substantial body of international evidence indicates that these children display poorer cognitive and socio-emotional outcomes than children living in traditional families, research on childhood mental disorders is scarce. This report provides new evidence of the relationships between family structure and childhood mental disorders in an under-researched context, Australia.
We use recent, nationally representative data on children aged 4–17 from Young Minds Matter, the second Australian Child and Adolescent Survey of Mental Health and Well-being (N = 6310). Mental disorders were assessed using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children—Version IV and included social phobia, separation anxiety disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, obsessive–compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and conduct disorder.
Compared to children living in original families, children in one-parent, blended, and step families experienced a higher prevalence of mental disorders. Amongst children whose parents separated, the time since separation was not statistically significantly related to the prevalence of mental disorders.
Although we are unable to assess causality, our findings highlight the strength of the association between family structure and child and adolescent mental health. They also stress the need for programs to support children, parents, and families in non-traditional family types to reduce mental health inequalities in childhood and later life.
KeywordsFamily structure Parental separation Childhood Mental disorders Australia
- 4.Bergström M, Modin B, Fransson E, Rajmil L, Berlin M, Gustafsson PA, Hjern A (2013) Living in two homes—a Swedish national survey of wellbeing in 12 and 15 year olds with joint physical custody. BMC Public Health 13:868. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/868
- 29.Bzostek S, Beck A. Working Paper 08-11-FF. Center for Research on Child Wellbeing; Princeton: 2008. Family structure and child health outcomes in fragile familiesGoogle Scholar
- 34.Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms and Profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- 36.Offord DR, Boyle MH, Fleming JE, Munroe-Blum H, Grant NI (1989) Ontario Child Health Study: summary of selected results. Can J Psychiaty 34(6):483–491Google Scholar
- 48.Sawyer MG, Arney FM, Baghurst PA et al (2000) Mental health of young people in Australia. Mental Health and Special Programs Branch, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged CareGoogle Scholar
- 55.Shaffer D, Fisher P, Lucas C, Dulcan MK, Schwab-Stone ME (2000) NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): description, differences from previous versions and reliability of some common diagnoses. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 39:28–38Google Scholar
- 57.Wolter KM (2007) Introduction to variance estimation, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 58.SAS Institute Inc (2014) SAS/STAT Software, Version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
- 59.Lawrence D, Johnson S, Hafekost J, Boterhoven de Haan K, Sawyer M, Ainley J, Zubrick SR (2015) the mental health of children and adolescents: report on the second Australian Child and Adolescent Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Department of Health, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 67.Eaton WW, Neufeld K, Chen L, Cai G (2000) A comparison of self-report and clinical diagnostic interviews for depression: diagnostic interview schedule and schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry in the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Follow-Up. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57(3):217–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar