Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the performance of general practitioners in a collaborative care program by employing simulated patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the performance of the general practitioners (GPs) in a collaborative care (CC) program in Iran with a control group of GPs in the usual care by employing simulated patients.

Methods

Six trained simulated patients (SPs) made unannounced visits to 26 GP offices participating in the CC program and to 26 age and sex matched controls. The SPs role played five clinical scenarios of mental disorders and filled out checklists to evaluate the GPs’ performance regarding interviewing, taking history, establishing rapport, showing empathy, and giving advice to patients. Additionally, the GPs’ plan of care and prescriptions were evaluated later by a psychiatrist based on the documents provided by the SPs.

Results

There was a significant difference between collaborative care and control group physicians in their global performance; CC physicians built up better patient–physician relationship. They performed better in evaluating a psychotic patient, although not better in their management. CC physicians were marginally better in approach to patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and mild major depressive disorder.

Conclusion

The overall performance of physicians in CC was better than the GPs in the control group in making an effective patient–physician relationship, and evaluating a psychotic patient. The main weakness of the GPs was in proper treatment of the minor and more common psychiatric disorders and in evaluation of patients with suicidal ideations who were in need for emergent referral. Evaluating performance of the practitioners is feasible employing SPs and the findings can be translated into improvements in the available services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharifi V, Amin-Esmaeili M, Hajebi A, Motevalian A, Radgoodarzi R, Hefazi M, Rahimi-Movaghar A (2015) Twelve-month prevalence and correlates of psychiatric disorders in Iran: The Iranian Mental Health Survey, 2011. Arch Iran Med 18(2):76–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurdyak P, Stukel TA, Goldbloom D, Kopp A, Zagorski BM, Mulsant BH (2014) Universal coverage without universal access: a study of psychiatrist supply and practice patterns in Ontario. Open Med 8(3):e87

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Noorbala AA, Bagheri Yazdi SA, Yasamy MT, Mohammad K (2004) Mental health survey of the adult population in Iran. Br J Psychiatry 184(1):70–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shahmohammadi S, Yaghobi H, Bolhari J, Moshirpour S (2013) Integration of mental health care in primary health care program in Iran: a systematic review. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol 19(1):3–8 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sharifi V (2009) Urban mental health in Iran: challenges and future directions. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci 3(1):9–14

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sharifi V, Abolhasani F, Farhoudian A, Amin-Esmaeili M (2014) Community Mental Health Centers in Iran:Planning Evidence-based Services. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol 19(3):163–176 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Araya R, Flynn T, Rojas G, Fritsch R, Simon G (2006) Cost-effectiveness of a primary care treatment program for depression in low-income women in Santiago, Chile. Am J Psychiatry 163(8):1379–1387. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.8.1379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Araya R, Rojas G, Fritsch R, Gaete J, Rojas M, Simon G, Peters TJ (2003) Treating depression in primary care in low-income women in Santiago, Chile: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361(9362):995–1000. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12825-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Archer J, Bower P, Gilbody S, Lovell K, Richards D, Gask L, Dickens C, Coventry P (2012) Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD006525. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel V, Weiss HA, Chowdhary N, Naik S, Pednekar S, Chatterjee S, Bhat B, Araya R, King M, Simon G, Verdeli H, Kirkwood BR (2011) Lay health worker led intervention for depressive and anxiety disorders in India: impact on clinical and disability outcomes over 12 months. Br J Psychiatry 199(6):459–466. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.092155

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rojas G, Fritsch R, Solis J, Jadresic E, Castillo C, Gonzalez M, Guajardo V, Lewis G, Peters TJ, Araya R (2007) Treatment of postnatal depression in low-income mothers in primary-care clinics in Santiago, Chile: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 370(9599):1629–1637. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61685-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Richards DA, Richards DA, Bower P, Chew-Graham C, Gask L, Lovell K, Cape J, Pilling S, Araya R, Kessler D, Barkham M, Bland JM, Gilbody S, Green C, Lewis G, Manning C, Kontopantelis E, Hill JJ, Hughes-Morley A, Russell A (2016) Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess 20(14):1–192. doi:10.3310/hta20140

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Grochtdreis T, Brettschneider C, Wegener A, Watzke B, Riedel-Heller S, Harter M, Konig HH (2015) Cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for the treatment of depressive disorders in primary care: a systematic review. PLoS One 10(5):e0123078. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123078

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan S, Pullon S, McKinlay E (2015) Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: An integrative literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 52(7):1217–1230. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Farooq S (2013) Collaborative care for depression: a literature review and a model for implementation in developing countries. Int Health 5(1):24–58. doi:10.1093/inthealth/ihs015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tapia-Munoz T, Mascayano F, Toso-Salman J (2015) Collaborative care models to address late-life depression: lessons for low-and-middle-income countries. Front Psychiatry 6:64. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00064

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. van Steenbergen-Weijenburg KM, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Horn EK, van Marwijk HW, Beekman AT, Rutten FF, Hakkaart-van Roijen L (2010) Cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for the treatment of major depressive disorder in primary care. A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 10:19. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hirschfeld RM (2001) The comorbidity of major depression and anxiety disorders: recognition and management in primary care. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 3(6):244–254

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mergl R, Seidscheck I, Allgaier AK, Möller HJ, Hegerl U, Henkel V (2007) Depressive, anxiety, and somatoform disorders in primary care: prevalence and recognition. Depress Anxiety 24(3):185–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shirazi M, Sadeghi M, Emami A, Kashani AS, Parikh S, Alaeddini F, Arbabi M, Wahlstrom R (2011) Training and validation of standardized patients for unannounced assessment of physicians’ management of depression. Acad Psychiatry 35(6):382–387. doi:10.1176/appi.ap.35.6.382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shirazi M, Labaf A, Monjazebi F, Jalili M, Mirzazadeh M, Ponzer S, Masiello I (2014) Assessing medical students’ communication skills by the use of standardized patients: emphasizing standardized patients’ quality assurance. Acad Psychiatry 38(3):354–360. doi:10.1007/s40596-014-0066-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wallace J, Rao R, Haslam R (2002) Simulated patients and objective structured clinical examinations: review of their use in medical education. Adv Psychiatr Treat 8(5):342–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wright B, McKendree J, Morgan L, Allgar VL, Brown A (2014) Examiner and simulated patient ratings of empathy in medical student final year clinical examination: are they useful? BMC Med Educ 14(1):199

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Oud MJ, Schuling J, Slooff CJ, Groenier KH, Dekker JH, Meyboom-de Jong B (2009) Care for patients with severe mental illness: the general practitioner’s role perspective. BMC Fam Pract 10:29. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-10-29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lester H, Birchwood M, Freemantle N, Michail M, Tait L (2009) REDIRECT: cluster randomised controlled trial of GP training in first-episode psychosis. Br J Gen Pract 59(563):e183–e190. doi:10.3399/bjgp09X420851

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Power P, Iacoponi E, Reynolds N, Fisher H, Russell M, Garety P, McGuire PK, Craig T (2007) The Lambeth Early Onset Crisis Assessment Team Study: general practitioner education and access to an early detection team in first-episode psychosis. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 51:s133–s139. doi:10.1192/bjp.191.51.s133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Simon AE, Jegerlehner S, Muller T, Cattapan-Ludewig K, Frey P, Grossenbacher M, Seifritz E, Umbricht D (2010) Prodromal schizophrenia in primary care: a randomised sensitisation study. Br J Gen Pract 60(578):e353–e359. doi:10.3399/bjgp10X515377

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson KK, Fuhrer R, Wynant W, Abrahamowicz M, Buckeridge DL, Malla A (2013) Patterns of health services use prior to a first diagnosis of psychosis: the importance of primary care. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 48(9):1389–1398. doi:10.1007/s00127-013-0665-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mitchell AJ, Vaze A, Rao S (2009) Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. The Lancet 374(9690):609–619. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60879-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sadeghi M, Mirsepassi G (2005) Psychiatry in Iran. Int Psychiatry 10:10–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was support by a Grant (No. 91-04-30-20052) from the Ministry of Health and Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services in Iran. The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of Ms. Zahra Noee and Dr. Leila Kashani to conduct the study, and Dr. Maryam Abbasinejad to edit the manuscript, respectively. We are particularly grateful to those who participated in the study as SPs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Homayoun Amini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amini, H., Shakiba, A., Sharifi, V. et al. Evaluation of the performance of general practitioners in a collaborative care program by employing simulated patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 51, 1311–1319 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1226-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1226-3

Keywords

Navigation