An “immigrant paradox” for adolescent externalizing behavior? Evidence from a national sample

  • Christopher P. Salas-WrightEmail author
  • Michael G. Vaughn
  • Seth J. Schwartz
  • David Córdova
Original Paper



Recent decades have witnessed a rise in the number of immigrant children in the United States (US) and concomitant concerns regarding externalizing behaviors such as crime, violence, and drug misuse by immigrant adolescents. The objective of the present study was to systematically compare the prevalence of externalizing behaviors and migration-related factors among immigrant and US-born adolescents in the US.


Data on 12 to 17 year olds (Weighted N in thousands = 25,057) from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) R-DAS between 2002 and 2009 were used. The R-DAS online analytic software was employed. Prevalence estimates and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated adjusting for the complex survey sampling design.


Compared to their US-born counterparts, immigrant adolescents—particularly those between the ages of 15 and 17 years—are significantly less likely to be involved in externalizing behaviors. In addition, later age of arrival and fewer years spent in the US were associated with reduced odds of externalizing behavior. Supplementary analyses indicate that the link between nativity and externalizing behavior may be primarily driven by differences between US-born and immigrant youth who self-identify as non-Hispanic black or Hispanic. Immigrant adolescents are also more likely to report cohesive parental relationships, positive school engagement, and disapproving views with respect to adolescent substance use.


This study extends prior research on the “immigrant paradox” to externalizing behavior among adolescents using a nationally representative data source. Findings highlight the importance of examining age, age of arrival, duration, and race/ethnicity in the study of nativity and externalizing.


Immigrant paradox Substance use Violence Crime Acculturation 



This research was supported in part by Grant Number R25 DA030310 (PI: Anthony) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Grieco EM The “Second Great Wave” of immigration: Growth of the foreign-born population since 1970. Accessed 11 March 2015
  2. 2.
    United States Census Bureau (2015) The foreign-born population in the United States. Accessed 11 March 2015
  3. 3.
    US Census Bureau (2013) How do we know? America’s foreign born in the last 50 years.
  4. 4.
    Hernandez DJ, Denton NA, Macartney SE Children in immigrant families: looking to America’s future. In: Social policy report, vol 22, No 3. Society for Research in Child DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daniels R (2004) Guarding the golden door: American immigration policy and immigrants since 1882. Hill and Wang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chavez L (2013) The Latino threat: constructing immigrants, citizens, and the nation. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang X (2012) Undocumented immigrants as perceived criminal threat: a test of the minority threat perspective. Criminology 50(3):743–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bersani BE, Loughran TA, Piquero AR (2014) Comparing patterns and predictors of immigrant offending among a sample of adjudicated youth. J Youth Adolesc 43:1914–1933CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, DeLisi M, Maynard BR (2014) The immigrant paradox: immigrants are less antisocial than native-born Americans. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 49(7):1129–1137PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, Cooper-Sadlo S, Maynard BR, Larson MJ (2015) Are immigrants more likely than native-born Americans to perpetrate intimate partner violence? J Interpers Violence 30(11):1888–1904CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, Qian Z, Wang J (2015) Evidence of a “refugee paradox” for antisocial behavior and violence in the United States. J Forensic Psychiatr. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2015.1049194 (Advance online publication)
  12. 12.
    Mancini M, Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG (2015) Drug use and service utilization among Hispanics in the United States. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1111-5 (Advance online publication)
  13. 13.
    Bui HN (2013) Racial and ethnic differences in the immigrant paradox in substance use. J Immigr Minor Health 15(5):866–881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salas-Wright CP, Clark TT, Vaughn MG, Córdova D (2015) Profiles of acculturation among Hispanics in the United States: links with discrimination and substance use. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 50(1):39–49PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kennedy S, Kidd MP, McDonald JT, Biddle N (2014) The healthy immigrant effect: patterns and evidence from four countries. J Int Migr Integr. doi: 10.1007/s12134-014-0340-x (Advance online publication)
  16. 16.
    Salas-Wright CP, Kagotho N, Vaughn MG (2014) Mood, anxiety, and personality disorders among first and second-generation immigrants to the United States. Psychiat Res 220(3):1028–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salas-Wright CP, Lee S, Vaughn MG, Jang Y, Sangalang CC (2015) Acculturative heterogeneity among Asian/Pacific Islanders in the United States: associations with DSM mental and substance use disorders. Am J Orthopsychiat 85(4):362–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, Huang J, Qian Z, Terzis L, Helton J (2015) Adverse childhood experiences among immigrants to the United States. J Interpers Violence. doi: 10.1177/0886260515589568 (Advance online publication)
  19. 19.
    Almeida J, Johnson RM, Matsumoto A, Godette DC (2012) Substance use, generation and time in the United States: the modifying role of gender for immigrant urban adolescents. Soc Sci Med 75(12):2069–2075PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, Maynard BR et al (2014) Criminal epidemiology and the immigrant paradox: intergenerational discontinuity in violence and antisocial behavior among immigrants. J Crim Justice 42(6):483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    García Coll C, Marks AKE (2012) The immigrant paradox in children and adolescents: Is becoming American a developmental risk? American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buriel R (2012) Historical origins of the immigrant paradox for Mexican American students: the cultural integration hypothesis. In: García Coll C, Marks AKE (eds) The immigrant paradox in children and adolescents: Is becoming American a developmental risk? American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C, pp 37–60Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Forster M, Grigsby T, Soto D et al (2014) The role of bicultural stress and perceived context of reception in the expression of aggression and rule breaking behaviors among recent immigrant Hispanic youth. J Interpers Violence. doi: 10.1177/0886260514549052 (Advance online publication)
  24. 24.
    Schwartz SJ, Unger JB, Lorenzo-Blanco EI et al (2014) Perceived context of reception among recent Hispanic immigrants: conceptualization, instrument development, and preliminary validation. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 20(1):1–15PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwartz SJ, Unger JB, Baezconde-Garbanati L et al (2015) Trajectories of cultural stressors and effects on mental health and substance use among Hispanic immigrant adolescents. J Adolesc Health. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.011 (Advance online publication)
  26. 26.
    Salas-Wright CP, Robles EH, Vaughn MG, Córdova D, Figueroa RP (2015) Toward a typology of acculturative stress: findings from a national sample of Hispanic immigrants. Hispanic J Behav Sci 37(2):223–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG, Hodge DR, Perron BE (2012) Religiosity profiles of American youth in relation to substance use, violence, and delinquency. J Youth Adolesc 41(12):1560–1575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG, Maynard BR (2014) Buffering effects of religiosity on crime: testing the invariance hypothesis across gender and developmental period. Crim Justice Behav 41(6):673–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marks AK, Ejesi K, García Coll C (2014) Understanding the US immigrant paradox in childhood and adolescence. Child Dev Perspect 8(2):59–64Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Menjívar C, Bejarano C (2004) Latino immigrants’ perceptions of crime and police authorities in the United States: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan area. Ethnic Racial Stud 27(1):120–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gonzales NA, Wong JJ, Toomey RB et al (2014) School engagement mediates long-term prevention effects for Mexican American adolescents. Prev Sci 15(6):929–939PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Prado GJ, Schwartz SJ, Maldonado-Molina M et al (2008) Ecodevelopmental × intrapersonal risk: substance use and sexual behavior in Hispanic adolescents. Health Educ Behav 36:45–61PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schwartz SJ, Unger JB, Des Rosiers SE et al (2012) Substance use and sexual behavior among recent Hispanic immigrant adolescents: effects of parent–adolescent differential acculturation and communication. Drug Alcohol Depend 125:S26–S34PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smokowski PR, Rose RA, Bacallao M (2009) Acculturation and aggression in Latino adolescents: modeling longitudinal trajectories from the Latino acculturation and health project. Child Psychiat Hum Dev 40(4):589–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Suárez-Orozco C, Rhodes J, Milburn M (2009) Unraveling the immigrant paradox academic engagement and disengagement among recently arrived immigrant youth. Youth Soc 41(2):151–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Unger JB, Ritt-Olson A, Soto DW, Baezconde-Garbanati L (2009) Parent–child acculturation discrepancies as a risk factor for substance use among Hispanic adolescents in Southern California. J Immigr Minor Health 11(3):149–157PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    (2014a) National Survey on Drug Use and Health: 8-Year R-DAS (2002–2009) Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    (2014b) Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings (2014 Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Breslau J, Borges G, Hagar Y et al (2009) Immigration to the USA and risk for mood and anxiety disorders: variation by origin and age at immigration. Psychol Med 39(07):1117–1127PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG (2014) A “refugee paradox” for substance use disorders? Drug Alcohol Depend 142:345–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Herman-Stahl MA, Krebs CP, Kroutil LA, Heller DC (2006) Risk and protective factors for nonmedical use of prescription stimulants and methamphetamine among adolescents. J Adolescent Health 39(3):374–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vaughn MG, Maynard BR, Salas-Wright CP et al (2013) Prevalence and correlates of truancy in the US: results from a national sample. J Adolesc 36(4):767–776PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    DeLisi M, Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP (2015) Rumble: prevalence and correlates of group fighting among adolescents in the United States. Behav Sci 5(2):214–229PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Szumilas M (2010) Explaining odds ratios. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19(3):227–229PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cumming G, Finch S (2005) Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. Am Psychol 60(2):170–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bacio GA, Mays VM, Lau AS (2013) Drinking initiation and problematic drinking among Latino adolescents: explanations of the immigrant paradox. Psychol Addict Behav 27(1):14–22PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Prado G, Huang S, Schwartz SJ et al (2004) What accounts for differences in substance use among US-born and immigrant Hispanic adolescents? Results from a longitudinal prospective cohort study. J Adolescent Health 45(2):118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Steinberg L (2008) A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev Rev 28(1):78–106PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Li K, Wen M (2015) Substance use, age at migration, and length of residence among adult immigrants in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health 17:156–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG, Clark TT et al (2014) Substance use disorders among first and second-generation immigrants in the USA: evidence of an immigrant paradox? J Stud Alcohol Drugs 75(6):958–967PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wilson AN, Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG, Maynard BR (2015) Gambling prevalence rates among immigrants: a multigenerational examination. Addict Behav 42:79–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schwartz SJ, Unger JB, Zamboanga BL, Szapocznik J (2010) Rethinking the concept of acculturation: implications for theory and research. Am Psychologist 65(4):237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG, Todic J, Cordova D, Perron, BR (2015) Trends in the disapproval and use of marijuana among adolescents and young adults in the United States: 2002–2013. Am J Drug Alcohol Abus. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2015.1049493 (Advance online publication)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher P. Salas-Wright
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael G. Vaughn
    • 2
  • Seth J. Schwartz
    • 3
  • David Córdova
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Social WorkThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.School of Social Work, College for Public Health and Social JusticeSaint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Public Health Sciences, Leonard M. Miller School of MedicineUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  4. 4.School of Social WorkUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations