An “immigrant paradox” for adolescent externalizing behavior? Evidence from a national sample
- 854 Downloads
Recent decades have witnessed a rise in the number of immigrant children in the United States (US) and concomitant concerns regarding externalizing behaviors such as crime, violence, and drug misuse by immigrant adolescents. The objective of the present study was to systematically compare the prevalence of externalizing behaviors and migration-related factors among immigrant and US-born adolescents in the US.
Data on 12 to 17 year olds (Weighted N in thousands = 25,057) from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) R-DAS between 2002 and 2009 were used. The R-DAS online analytic software was employed. Prevalence estimates and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated adjusting for the complex survey sampling design.
Compared to their US-born counterparts, immigrant adolescents—particularly those between the ages of 15 and 17 years—are significantly less likely to be involved in externalizing behaviors. In addition, later age of arrival and fewer years spent in the US were associated with reduced odds of externalizing behavior. Supplementary analyses indicate that the link between nativity and externalizing behavior may be primarily driven by differences between US-born and immigrant youth who self-identify as non-Hispanic black or Hispanic. Immigrant adolescents are also more likely to report cohesive parental relationships, positive school engagement, and disapproving views with respect to adolescent substance use.
This study extends prior research on the “immigrant paradox” to externalizing behavior among adolescents using a nationally representative data source. Findings highlight the importance of examining age, age of arrival, duration, and race/ethnicity in the study of nativity and externalizing.
KeywordsImmigrant paradox Substance use Violence Crime Acculturation
This research was supported in part by Grant Number R25 DA030310 (PI: Anthony) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 1.Grieco EM The “Second Great Wave” of immigration: Growth of the foreign-born population since 1970. http://blogs.census.gov/2014/02/26/the-second-great-wave-of-immigration-growth-of-the-foreign-born-population-since-1970/. Accessed 11 March 2015
- 2.United States Census Bureau (2015) The foreign-born population in the United States. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/pdf/cspan_fb_slides.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2015
- 3.US Census Bureau (2013) How do we know? America’s foreign born in the last 50 years. http://www.census.gov/library/infographics/foreign_born.html
- 4.Hernandez DJ, Denton NA, Macartney SE Children in immigrant families: looking to America’s future. In: Social policy report, vol 22, No 3. Society for Research in Child DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
- 5.Daniels R (2004) Guarding the golden door: American immigration policy and immigrants since 1882. Hill and Wang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 6.Chavez L (2013) The Latino threat: constructing immigrants, citizens, and the nation. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- 11.Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, Qian Z, Wang J (2015) Evidence of a “refugee paradox” for antisocial behavior and violence in the United States. J Forensic Psychiatr. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2015.1049194 (Advance online publication)
- 12.Mancini M, Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG (2015) Drug use and service utilization among Hispanics in the United States. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1111-5 (Advance online publication)
- 15.Kennedy S, Kidd MP, McDonald JT, Biddle N (2014) The healthy immigrant effect: patterns and evidence from four countries. J Int Migr Integr. doi: 10.1007/s12134-014-0340-x (Advance online publication)
- 18.Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, Huang J, Qian Z, Terzis L, Helton J (2015) Adverse childhood experiences among immigrants to the United States. J Interpers Violence. doi: 10.1177/0886260515589568 (Advance online publication)
- 21.García Coll C, Marks AKE (2012) The immigrant paradox in children and adolescents: Is becoming American a developmental risk? American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- 22.Buriel R (2012) Historical origins of the immigrant paradox for Mexican American students: the cultural integration hypothesis. In: García Coll C, Marks AKE (eds) The immigrant paradox in children and adolescents: Is becoming American a developmental risk? American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C, pp 37–60Google Scholar
- 23.Forster M, Grigsby T, Soto D et al (2014) The role of bicultural stress and perceived context of reception in the expression of aggression and rule breaking behaviors among recent immigrant Hispanic youth. J Interpers Violence. doi: 10.1177/0886260514549052 (Advance online publication)
- 25.Schwartz SJ, Unger JB, Baezconde-Garbanati L et al (2015) Trajectories of cultural stressors and effects on mental health and substance use among Hispanic immigrant adolescents. J Adolesc Health. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.011 (Advance online publication)
- 29.Marks AK, Ejesi K, García Coll C (2014) Understanding the US immigrant paradox in childhood and adolescence. Child Dev Perspect 8(2):59–64Google Scholar
- 37.(2014a) National Survey on Drug Use and Health: 8-Year R-DAS (2002–2009) Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services AdministrationGoogle Scholar
- 38.(2014b) Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings (2014 Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services AdministrationGoogle Scholar
- 53.Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG, Todic J, Cordova D, Perron, BR (2015) Trends in the disapproval and use of marijuana among adolescents and young adults in the United States: 2002–2013. Am J Drug Alcohol Abus. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2015.1049493 (Advance online publication)