Neighborhood socioeconomic conditions and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The evidence linking neighborhood socioeconomic conditions (NSEC) with depression is mixed. We performed a systematic review of this literature, including a rigorous quality assessment that was used to explore if methodological or contextual factors explained heterogeneity across studies.
A systematic literature search in three databases identified longitudinal studies among adolescents and adults living in high-income countries. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion and performed data abstraction. We conducted a formal quality assessment and investigated sources of study heterogeneity.
Our database search identified 3711 articles, 84 of which were determined to be potentially relevant, and 14 articles were included in this review. About half of the studies found a significant association between NSEC and depression, and pooled estimates suggest poorer socioeconomic conditions were associated with higher odds of depression (OR = 1.14, 95 % CI 1.01, 1.28). Study results varied by follow-up time. Among studies with less than 5 years of follow-up, there was a significant association between NSEC and depression (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI 1.13, 1.44), although pooling of study results may not be warranted due to heterogeneity across studies. Among studies with at least 5 years of follow-up, which were homogeneous, there was no association (OR = 1.00, 95 % CI 0.95, 1.06) between NSEC and depression.
We found inconsistent evidence in support of a longitudinal association between NSEC and depression, and heterogeneity according to the length of follow-up time might partly explain the mixed evidence observed in the literature on NSEC and depression.
KeywordsDepression Depressive symptoms Neighborhood environment Socioeconomic deprivation Systematic review
- 2.The global burden of disease (2004) update (2008). World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 8.Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader M-J, Subramanian S, Carson R (2002) Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol 156(5):471–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Bank TW (2013) How we classify countries. The World Bank http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications. Accessed 13/10/13
- 13.Ottawa Hospital Research Institute The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed November 15, 2014
- 14.Sariaslan A, Larsson H, D’Onofrio B, Långström N, Fazel S, Lichtenstein P (2014) Does population density and neighborhood deprivation predict schizophrenia? A nationwide swedish family-based study of 2.4 million individuals. Schizophr Bull:sbu105Google Scholar
- 20.Cooper HL, Hunter-Jones J, Kelley ME, Karnes C, Haley DF, Ross Z, Rothenberg R, Bonney LE (2014) The aftermath of public housing relocations: relationships between changes in local socioeconomic conditions and depressive symptoms in a cohort of adult relocaters. J Urban Health 91(2):223–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Sterne JA, Harbord RM (2004) Funnel plots in meta-analysis. Stata Journal 4:127–141Google Scholar
- 32.Nandi A, Welsh L (2013) Social context and mental health over the life course. In: Koenen KC, Rudenstine S, Susser E, Galea S (eds) A life course approach to mental disorders. Oxford University Press, Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar