Psychosocial sequelae of cannabis use and implications for policy: findings from the Christchurch Health and Development Study
- 708 Downloads
The Christchurch Health and Development Study is a longitudinal study of a birth cohort of 1265 children who were born in Christchurch, New Zealand, in 1977. This cohort has now been studied from birth to the age of 35.
Scope of this review
This article examines a series of findings from the CHDS that address a range of issues relating to the use of cannabis amongst the cohort. These issues include: (a) patterns of cannabis use and cannabis dependence; (b) linkages between cannabis use and adverse educational and economic outcomes; (c) cannabis and other illicit drug use; (d) cannabis and psychotic symptoms; (e) other CHDS findings related to cannabis; and (f) the consequences of cannabis use for adults using cannabis regularly.
In general, the findings of the CHDS suggest that individuals who use cannabis regularly, or who begin using cannabis at earlier ages, are at increased risk of a range of adverse outcomes, including: lower levels of educational attainment; welfare dependence and unemployment; using other, more dangerous illicit drugs; and psychotic symptomatology. It should also be noted, however, that there is a substantial proportion of regular adult users who do not experience harmful consequences as a result of cannabis use.
Collectively, these findings suggest that cannabis policy needs to be further developed and evaluated in order to find the best way to regulate a widely-used, and increasingly legal substance.
KeywordsCannabis Cannabis dependence Education Unemployment Welfare dependence Gateway theory Psychosis
The Christchurch Health and Development Study has been funded by grants from the Health Research Council of New Zealand, the National Child Health Research Foundation, the Canterbury Medical Research Foundation and the New Zealand Lottery Grants Board.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
All data described herein were collected with the informed consent of participants. All aspects of study design and conduct have been approved by the Canterbury (New Zealand) Ethics Committee.
- 2.Macleod J, Oakes R, Copello A, Crome I, Egger M, Hickman M, Oppenkowski T, Stokes-Lampard H, Smith G (2004) Psychological and social sequelae of cannabis and other illicit drug use by young people: A systematic review of longitudinal, general population studies. Lancet 363:1579–1588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Room R, Fischer B, Hall W, Lenton S, Reuter P (2008) Cannabis policy: Moving beyond stalemateGoogle Scholar
- 4.Hall W (2014) What has research over the past two decades revealed about the adverse health effects of recreational cannabis use? AddictionGoogle Scholar
- 5.The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (2004) NORML: Working to reform marijuana laws. The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. http://www.norml.org/. Accessed 27 July 2005
- 6.Marijuana Policy Project (2014) Marijuana Policy Project. Marijuana Policy Project. http://www.mpp.org/. Accessed 17 Feb 2015
- 7.Drug Policy Alliance (2015) Drug Policy Alliance. Drug Policy Alliance. http://www.drugpolicy.org/. Accessed 17 Feb 2015
- 8.Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana (2015) Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana. Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana. http://www.calmca.org/about/. Accessed 20 Feb 2015
- 9.Project SAM (2015) SAM: Smart Approaches to Marijuana. Project SAM. http://learnaboutsam.org/. Accessed 20 Feb 2015
- 13.Ellickson P, Bui K, Bell RM, McGuigan KA (1998) Does early drug use increase the risk of dropping out of high school? J Drug Issues 28:357Google Scholar
- 16.Degenhardt L, Chiu WT, Sampson N, Kessler RC, Anthony JC (2007) Epidemiological patterns of extra-medical drug use in the United States: Evidence from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, 2001-2003. Drug Alcohol DependGoogle Scholar
- 29.Degenhardt L, Chiu WT, Conway K, Dierker L, Glantz M, Kalaydjian A, Merikangas K, Sampson N, Swendsen J, Kessler RC (2009) Does the ‘gateway’ matter? Associations between the order of drug use initiation and the development of drug dependence in the National Comorbidity Study Replication. Psychol Med 39(1):157–167PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.O’Donnell JA, Clayton RR (1982) The stepping-stone hypothesis—marijuana, heroin, and causality. Chem Depend Behav Biomed Issues 4:229–241Google Scholar
- 42.Allison PD (2009) Fixed effects regression models. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
- 58.Korhonen T, Huizink AC, Dick DM, Pulkkinen L, Rose RJ, Kaprio J (2008) Role of individual, peer and family factors in the use of cannabis and other illicit drugs: a longitudinal analysis among Finnish adolescent twins. Drug Alcohol Depend 97:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.015 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 59.Alfonso JP, Huedo-Medina TB, Espada JP (2009) Risk factors predictors of the pattern of substance use during the adolescence. Anales De Psicologia 25(2):330–338Google Scholar
- 61.Pomerleau OF, Pomerleau CS (1987) A biobehavioral view of substance abuse and addiction. J Drug Issues 17(1–2):111–131Google Scholar
- 68.Arseneault L, Cannon M, Witton J, Murray RM (2004) Causal association between cannabis and psychosis: examination of the evidence. Br J Psychiatry 184. doi: 10.1192/bjp.184.2.110
- 73.Caspi A, Moffitt T, Cannon M, McClay J, Murray R, Harrington H, Taylor A, Arseneault L, Williams B, Braithwaite A, Poulton R, Craig I (2005) Moderation of the effect of adolescent-onset cannabis use on adult psychosis by a functional polymorphism in the catechol-o-methyltransferase gene: longitudinal evidence of a gene × environment interaction. Biol Psychiatry 57:1117–1127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 81.Harrison GP Jr, Gruber AJ, Hudson JI, Huestis MA, Yurgelun-Todd D (2002) Cognitive measures in long-term cannabis users. J Clin Pharmacol 42(11 Suppl):41S–47SGoogle Scholar
- 84.Greenwald G (2009) Drug decriminalization in Portugal: Lessons for creating fair and successful drug policies. Cato Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 89.Antó JM (2005) The precautionary approach: from Birth to childhood. Epidemiology for risk assessment: losing the beginner’s confidence. Eur J Public Health 15. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki172