Caregiver distress in first-episode psychosis: the role of subjective appraisal, over-involvement and symptomatology
- 552 Downloads
Caregivers of persons with first-episode psychosis (FEP) often report high levels of distress. Preventing long-term or chronic distress within the whole family is an important focus of early intervention for psychosis. However, a more comprehensive understanding of the psychological factors involved is needed.
To examine the impact of subjective appraisals and expressed emotion on caregiver distress in FEP.
Within a cross-sectional design, 154 caregivers of 99 persons with FEP in a clinical epidemiological sample completed a series of questionnaires to examine potential predictors of caregiver distress.
Thirty-seven percent of caregivers were suffering from clinically significant distress. A linear mixed model analysis found that, after controlling for caregiver socio-demographic factors, service-user symptoms and global functioning, emotional over-involvement and subjective appraisal of caregiving were significant predictors of caregiver distress.
Caregiver distress is significant in the early phase of illness, and this seems to be more related to their subjective appraisal and over-involvement, than to variations in symptoms and global functioning of the person diagnosed with FEP. This lends further support to the stress-appraisal coping model and the cognitive model of caregiving in FEP, and highlights supportive interventions aimed at handling unhelpful cognitions and behaviors.
KeywordsCaregivers Distress Emotional over-involvement First-episode psychosis
We are grateful to all of the patients and their caregivers who consented to participate, and to the clinicians in Opus Region Zealand, who provided access to their clients. The Region Zealand Health Scientific Research Foundation provided funding for this research, but had no involvement in the production of this paper.
Conflict of interest
- 2.Kuipers E, Bebbington P, Barrowclough B (2005) Research on burden and coping strategies in families of people with mental disorders: problems and perspectives. In: Leff J, Lopez J, Maj M, Okasha A (eds) Sartorius N. Families and mental disorder. From Burden to Empowerment, Wiley, pp 217–234Google Scholar
- 9.Lazarus R, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 23.Petersen L, Jeppesen P, Thorup A, Abel M-B, Øhlenschlaeger J, Christensen TØ, Krarup G, Jørgensen P, Nordentoft M (2005) A randomised multicentre trial of integrated versus standard treatment for patients with a first episode of psychotic illness. BMJ 331:602PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Goldberg D, Williams P (1988) A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, WindsorGoogle Scholar
- 35.APA (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-III-R). Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- 43.Jansen JE, Lysaker PH, Harder S, Haahr UH, Lyse H-G, Pedersen MB, Trauelsen AM, Simonsen E (2013) Positive and negative caregiver experiences in first-episode psychosis: emotional overinvolvement, wellbeing and metacognition. Psychol Psychother. doi: 10.1111/papt.12014
- 47.Jansen JE, Harder S, Haahr UH, Lyse H-G, Pedersen MB, Trauelsen AM, Simonsen E (2014) The role of metacognitions in expressed emotion and distress: a study on caregivers of persons with first-episode psychosis. Clin Psychol Psychother. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1907