The co-occurrence of PTSD and dissociation: differentiating severe PTSD from dissociative-PTSD
- 2k Downloads
A dissociative-posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) subtype has been included in the DSM-5. However, it is not yet clear whether certain socio-demographic characteristics or psychological/clinical constructs such as comorbid psychopathology differentiate between severe PTSD and dissociative-PTSD. The current study investigated the existence of a dissociative-PTSD subtype and explored whether a number of trauma and clinical covariates could differentiate between severe PTSD alone and dissociative-PTSD.
The current study utilized a sample of 432 treatment seeking Canadian military veterans. Participants were assessed with the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and self-report measures of traumatic life events, depression, and anxiety. CAPS severity scores were created reflecting the sum of the frequency and intensity items from each of the 17 PTSD and 3 dissociation items. The CAPS severity scores were used as indicators in a latent profile analysis (LPA) to investigate the existence of a dissociative-PTSD subtype. Subsequently, several covariates were added to the model to explore differences between severe PTSD alone and dissociative-PTSD.
The LPA identified five classes: one of which constituted a severe PTSD group (30.5 %), and one of which constituted a dissociative-PTSD group (13.7 %). None of the included, demographic, trauma, or clinical covariates were significantly predictive of membership in the dissociative-PTSD group compared to the severe PTSD group.
In conclusion, a significant proportion of individuals report high levels of dissociation alongside their PTSD, which constitutes a dissociative-PTSD subtype. Further investigation is needed to identify which factors may increase or decrease the likelihood of membership in a dissociative-PTSD subtype group compared to a severe PTSD only group.
KeywordsPosttraumatic stress disorder Dissociation Dissociative subtype CAPS LPA Veterans Canadian
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 4.Layne CM, Warren JS, Watson PJ, Shalev AY (2007) Risk, vulnerabilities, resistance and resilience: towards integrated conceptualization of posttraumatic adaptation. In: Friedman MJ, Keane TM, Watson PA (eds) Handbook of PTSD, science and practice. Guilford Press, New York, pp 497–520Google Scholar
- 6.Waelde LC, Silvern L, Carlson EB, Fairbank JA, Kletter H (2009) Dissociation in PTSD. In: Dell PF, O’Neil JA (eds) Dissociation and the dissociative disorders. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 15.American Psychiatric Association (2010) DSM-5 development. http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=165. Accessed 05-07-2012
- 16.Carlson EB, Dalenberg C, McDade-Montez E (2012) Dissociation in posttraumatic stress disorder: part I. Definitions and review of research. Advanced online publication. Psychol Trauma Theory Res Pract Policy 4(5):479–489. doi: 10.1037/a0027748
- 17.Dalenberg C, Carlson EB (2012) Dissociation in posttraumatic stress disorder part II: how theoretical models fit the empirical evidence and recommendations for modifying the diagnostic criteria for PTSD. Psychol Trauma Theory Res Pract Policy 4(6):551–559. doi: 10.1037/a0027900
- 18.Hagenaars JA, McCutcheon AL (eds) (2002) Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 30.Muthen BO, Muthen LK (2012) Mplus (version 7). Los Angeles, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- 31.Muthen LK, Muthen BO (1998–2012) Mplus user’s guide, 7th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
- 32.Lazarsfeld PF, Henry NW (1968) Latent structure analysis. Houghton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 34.Muthen LK (2004a) Latent profile analysis. http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/13/115.html?1175697157
- 35.Muthen LK (2004b) Latent class analysis and cluster analysis. http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/13/155.html?1141671585
- 43.Lanius RA, Bluhm R, Lanius U (2006) PTSD symptom provocation and neuroimaging: heterogeneity of response. In: Vermetten E, Dorahy M, Speigel D (eds) Traumatic dissociation: neurobiology and treatment, chap 10. American Psychiatric Publishing, Washington DC, pp 191–217Google Scholar