Advertisement

Genetic attributions and mental illness diagnosis: effects on perceptions of danger, social distance, and real helping decisions

  • Aaron A. Lee
  • Sean M. Laurent
  • Thomas L. Wykes
  • Katherine A. Kitchen Andren
  • Katelynn A. Bourassa
  • Christine L. McKibbin
Original Paper

Abstract

Genetic essentialism suggests that beliefs in genetic causes of mental illness will inflate a desire for social distance from affected individuals, regardless of specific disorder. However, genetic contingency theory predicts that genetic attributions will lead to an increased desire for social distance only from persons with disorders who are perceived as dangerous.

Purpose

To assess the interactive effect of diagnosis and attribution on social distance and actual helping decisions across disorders.

Methods

Undergraduate students (n = 149) were randomly assigned to read one of the six vignettes depicting a person affected by one of the three disorders (i.e., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depression) with either a genetic or environmental causal attribution for disorder. Participants completed measures of perceived dangerousness, social distance, empathic concern, familiarity with mental illness, and actual helping decisions.

Results

When provided with genetic attributions, participants’ desire for social distance was greater for targets with schizophrenia relative to targets with depression or bipolar disorder. This effect was mediated by perceived dangerousness. The indirect effect of diagnosis on helping decisions, through social distance, was significant within the genetic attribution condition.

Conclusion

Consistent with genetic contingency theory, genetic attributions for schizophrenia, but not affective disorders, lead to greater desire for social distance via greater perceived dangerousness. Further, results suggest that genetic attributions decrease the likelihood of helping people with schizophrenia, but have no effect on the likelihood of helping people with affective disorders. These effects are partially accounted for by desired social distance from people with schizophrenia.

Keywords

Genetic Essentialism Mental illness Social distance Helping 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported in part by grants from the National Center for Research Resources (P20RR016474) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103432) from the National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Conrad P (2001) Genetic optimism: framing genes and mental illness in the news. Cult Med Psychiatry 25(2):225–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dar-Nimrod I, Heine SJ (2011) Genetic essentialism: on the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychol Bull 137(5):800–818. doi: 10.1037/a0021860 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nelkin D, Lindee MS (1995) The DNA mystique: the gene as cultural icon. WH Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haslam N (2011) Genetic essentialism, neuroessentialism, and stigma: commentary on Dar-Nimrod and Heine (2011). Psychol Bull 137(5):819–824. doi: 10.1037/a0022386 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Phelan JC (2005) Geneticization of deviant behavior and consequences for stigma: the case of mental illness. J Health Soc Behav 46(4):307–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Phelan JC (2002) Genetic bases of mental illness—a cure for stigma? Trends Neurosci 25(8):430–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jorm AF, Griffiths KM (2008) The public’s stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: how important are biomedical conceptualizations? Acta Psychiatr Scand 118(4):315–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01251.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Read J, Harré N (2001) The role of biological and genetic causal beliefs in the stigmatisation of ‘mental patients’. J Ment Health 10(2):223–235. doi: 10.1080/09638230123129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rusch N, Todd AR, Bodenhausen GV, Corrigan PW (2010) Biogenetic models of psychopathology, implicit guilt, and mental illness stigma. Psychiatry Res 179(3):328–332. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.09.010 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dietrich S, Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC (2006) The relationship between biogenetic causal explanations and social distance toward people with mental disorders: results from a population survey in Germany. Int J Soc Psychiatry 52(2):166–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schnittker J (2008) An uncertain revolution: why the rise of a genetic model of mental illness has not increased tolerance. Soc Sci Med 67(9):1370–1381. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.07.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breheny M (2007) Genetic attribution for schizophrenia, depression, and skin cancer: impact on social distance. N Z J Psychol 36(3):154–160Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Angermeyer MC, Dietrich S (2006) Public beliefs about and attitudes towards people with mental illness: a review of population studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand 113(3):163–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00699.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boysen GA, Gabreski JD (2012) The effect of combined etiological information on attitudes about mental disorders associated with violent and nonviolent behaviors. J Soc Clin Psychol 31(8):852–877. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2012.31.8.852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elgie R, Morselli PL (2007) Social functioning in bipolar patients: the perception and perspective of patients, relatives and advocacy organizations—a review. Bipolar Disord 9(1–2):144–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00339.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perlick DA, Rosenheck RA, Clarkin JF, Sirey JA, Salahi J, Struening EL, Link BG (2001) Stigma as a barrier to recovery: adverse effects of perceived stigma on social adaptation of persons diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder. Psychiatr Serv 52(12):1627–1632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vazquez GH, Kapczinski F, Magalhaes PV, Cordoba R, Lopez Jaramillo C, Rosa AR, Sanchez de Carmona M, Tohen M (2011) Stigma and functioning in patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 130(1–2):323–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hinshaw SP, Stier A (2008) Stigma as related to mental disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 4:367–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.4.022007.141245 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stier A, Hinshaw SP (2007) Explicit and implicit stigma against individuals with mental illness. Austral Psychol 42(2):106–117. doi: 10.1080/00050060701280599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lauber C, Nordt C, Falcato L, Rossler W (2004) Factors influencing social distance toward people with mental illness. Commun Ment Health J 40(3):265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Link BG, Yang LH, Phelan JC, Collins PY (2004) Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophr Bull 30(3):511–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Corrigan PW (2000) Mental health stigma as social attribution: implications for research methods and attitude change. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 7(1):48–67. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/7.1.48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mehta S, Farina A (1997) Is being ‘sick’ really better? Effect of the disease view of mental disorder on stigma. J Soc Clin Psychol 16(4):405–419. doi: 10.1521/jscp.1997.16.4.405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Joinson A (1999) Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 31(3):433–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Link BG, Cullen FT (1983) Reconsidering the social rejection of ex-mental patients: levels of attitudinal response. Am J Commun Psychol 11(3):261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Holmes EP, Corrigan PW, Williams P, Canar J, Kubiak MA (1999) Changing attitudes about schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 25(3):447–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Batson CD, Eklund JH, Chermok VL, Hoyt JL, Ortiz BG (2007) An additional antecedent of empathic concern: valuing the welfare of the person in need. J Pers Soc Psychol 93(1):65–74. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.65 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (2010), 19th edn. IBM Corp, ArmonkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40(3):879–891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schomerus G, Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC (2013) Causal beliefs of the public and social acceptance of persons with mental illness: a comparative analysis of schizophrenia, depression and alcohol dependence. Psychol Med, 1–12. doi: 10.1017/S003329171300072X
  31. 31.
    Feldman DB, Crandall CS (2007) Dimensions of mental illness stigma: what about mental illness causes social rejection? J Soc Clin Psychol 26(2):137–154. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.2.137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sears PM, Pomerantz AM, Segrist DJ, Rose P (2011) Beliefs about the biological (vs. nonbiological) origins of mental illness and the stigmatization of people with mental illness. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil 14(2):109–119. doi: 10.1080/15487768.2011.569665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jorm AF, Oh E (2009) Desire for social distance from people with mental disorders. Austral N Z J Psychiatry 43(3):183–200. doi: 10.1080/00048670802653349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Read J, Haslam N, Sayce L, Davies E (2006) Prejudice and schizophrenia: a review of the ‘mental illness is an illness like any other’ approach. Acta Psychiatr Scand 114(5):303–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00824.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Batson CD, Chang J, Orr R, Rowland J (2002) Empathy, attitudes and action: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 28(12):1656–1666. doi: 10.1177/014616702237647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Corrigan P, Markowitz FE, Watson A, Rowan D, Kubiak MA (2003) An attribution model of public discrimination towards persons with mental illness. J Health Soc Behav 44(2):162–179. doi: 10.2307/1519806 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bessenoff GR, Sherman JW (2000) Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: evaluation versus stereotype activation. Soc Cogn 18(4):329–353. doi: 10.1521/soco.2000.18.4.329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Joseph J (1999) The genetic theory of schizophrenia: a critical overview. Ethical Hum Sci Serv 1(2):119–145Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Page S (1995) Effects of the mental illness label in 1993: acceptance and rejection in the community. J Health Soc Policy 7(2):61–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stuart H (2006) Mental illness and employment discrimination. Curr Opin Psychiatry 19(5):522–526. doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000238482.27270.5d PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aaron A. Lee
    • 1
  • Sean M. Laurent
    • 2
  • Thomas L. Wykes
    • 1
  • Katherine A. Kitchen Andren
    • 1
  • Katelynn A. Bourassa
    • 1
  • Christine L. McKibbin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations