Social relationships and quality of life moderate distress associated with delusional ideation
- 427 Downloads
In a previous study, individuals who followed a particular new religious movement (NRM) reported significantly less distress even though they reported similar levels of delusional ideation when compared with individuals diagnosed with psychotic disorders. Protective factors such as social relationship quality and quality of life (QOL) were hypothesized to explain attenuated distress associated with delusional ideation.
NRM individuals (n = 29), individuals diagnosed with psychotic disorders (n = 25), and control individuals (n = 63) were recruited. Psychotic symptoms, delusion-proneness, and facets of social relationships quality and QOL were examined across group. Potential moderators of the relationship between group membership and distress were further examined in multiple regression models.
NRM participants reported more social relationships that were of higher quality (as demonstrated by more crisis supports, unique and overlap supports, more helpful supports and more reciprocated supports) than individuals with psychotic disorders. NRM participants also reported significantly higher QOL than individuals with psychotic disorders. Furthermore, NRM participants reported more distinct and less reciprocated supports, and significantly higher psychological, environmental, and total QOL, when compared with control participants. The relationship between group membership, delusional ideation, and distress was moderated by relationship reciprocity as well as by total QOL.
Findings highlight the importance of establishing healthy reciprocal social relationships and improving QOL in people diagnosed with psychotic disorders, as these factors may act as a buffer against distress associated with delusional beliefs.
KeywordsPsychosis Delusional ideation Distress Social relationships Quality of life
We are grateful to the individuals who participated in this study.
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee, Melbourne Health and Eastern Health Human Research Ethics Committee.
- 6.Barker E (1996) New religions and mental health. In: Bhugra D (ed) Psychiatry and religion: context, consensus and controversies. Routledge, London, New York, pp 125–138Google Scholar
- 22.American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4 (text revised) edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- 23.Corporation Psychological (1999) Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence manual. Author, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- 24.First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbons M, Williams JBW (2007) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders—non patient edition (SCID-I/NP, 1/2007 revision). New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research Department, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 25.Ventura J, Green MF, Shaner A, Liberman RP (1993) Training and quality assurance with the brief psychiatric rating scale—the drift busters. Int J Method 3:221–244Google Scholar
- 28.Bentall RP (2004) Madness explained: psychosis and human nature. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 33.Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS: and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 34.Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regressions: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
- 35.Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (1989) Applied regression models. Irwin, HomewoodGoogle Scholar
- 36.Hayes AF (2012) Process: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling (white paper). Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf