Serious psychological distress among non-Hispanic whites in the United States: the importance of nativity status and region of birth
Serious psychological distress (SPD) is an understudied health topic. When studied, estimates for minority groups are compared to that of non-Hispanic whites. Non-Hispanic whites are heterogeneous, and comprise individuals from Europe, North Africa or the Middle East. The objectives of this study are to estimate and compare the sex- and age-adjusted prevalence of SPD first by nativity status and then by region of birth (Europe, Middle East and Russia) while controlling for potential confounders.
The sample consisted of 196,483 participants, 18 years of age or older in the National Health Interview Survey (2000–2010). To measure SPD, Kessler’s K6 Likert scale was used. Individuals with scores greater than or equal to 13 were considered to have SPD.
The age- and sex- adjusted prevalence of SPD was 3 % for foreign-born non-Hispanic whites. Of this, estimates were 6 % for those from the Middle East, 3 % for Europe and 2 % for Russia (p = 0.00). In the fully adjusted multivariable model, foreign-born non-Hispanic whites from the Middle East were more likely (OR = 1.76; 95 % CI = 1.01, 3.04) to report SPD when compared to US-born non-Hispanic whites. Within the foreign-born population, non-Hispanic whites from the Middle East were more than twice as likely to report SPD (OR = 2.43; 95 % CI = 1.15, 5.14) compared to foreign-born non-Hispanic whites from Europe after controlling for confounders.
This study’s findings will help researchers understand which subgroups within non-Hispanic whites suffer most from SPD, which will facilitate tailored prevention intervention efforts.
KeywordsSerious psychological distress Region of birth National Health Interview Survey Middle East Nativity status
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 9.Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–83Google Scholar
- 37.Lin MT, Burgess JF Jr, Carey K (2011) The association between serious psychological distress and emergency department utilization among young adults in the USA. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 47(6):939–947Google Scholar
- 40.Office of Management and Budget (1997) Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_1997standards
- 44.National Center for Health Statistics (2011) Data File Documentation, National Health Interview Survey, 2000–2010 (machine readable data file and documentation). N.C.f.H.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, HyattsvilleGoogle Scholar
- 49.John DA et al (2012) Does an immigrant health paradox exist among Asian Americans? Associations of nativity and occupational class with self-rated health and mental disorders. Soc Sci Med 75(12):2085–2098Google Scholar
- 51.Statistics, N.C.f.H. About the National Health Interview Survey (2012). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/about_nhis.htm
- 53.Amer MM (2005) Arab American Mental Health in the Post September 11 era: acculturation, stress, and coping, in psychology. University of Toledo, Toledo, p 301Google Scholar
- 65.National Research Council, State of the USA Health Indicators: Letter Report (2009): Washington, DCGoogle Scholar