Measures of the recovery orientation of mental health services: systematic review
- 2.6k Downloads
The review aimed to (1) identify measures that assess the recovery orientation of services; (2) discuss how these measures have conceptualised recovery, and (3) characterise their psychometric properties.
A systematic review was undertaken using seven sources. The conceptualisation of recovery within each measure was investigated by rating items against a conceptual framework of recovery comprising five recovery processes: connectedness; hope and optimism; identity; meaning and purpose; and empowerment. Psychometric properties of measures were evaluated using quality criteria.
Thirteen recovery orientation measures were identified, of which six met eligibility criteria. No measure was a good fit with the conceptual framework. No measure had undergone extensive psychometric testing and none had data on test–retest reliability or sensitivity to change.
Many measures have been developed to assess the recovery orientation of services. Comparisons between the measures were hampered by the different conceptualisations of recovery used and by the lack of uniformity on the level of organisation at which services were assessed. This situation makes it a challenge for services and researchers to make an informed choice on which measure to use. Further work is needed to produce measures with a transparent conceptual underpinning and demonstrated psychometric properties.
KeywordsOutcome measures Reliability and validity Mental health services Systematic review
The study is independent research commissioned through an NIHR Programme Grant for Applied Research (grant RP-PG-0707-10040), and in relation to the NIHR Specialist Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at the Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London and the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
- 1.Harding CM (2003) Changes in schizophrenia across time: paradoxes, patterns, and predictors. In: Cohen C (ed) Schizophrenia into later life: Treatment, Research and Policy. APPI Press, pp 19–42Google Scholar
- 3.Deegan P (2001) Recovery: the lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosoc Rehabil J 11:11–19Google Scholar
- 5.Anthony WA (1993) Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehabil J 16(4):11–23Google Scholar
- 16.Davidson L, Tondora J, Staeheli LM, O’Connell MJ, Rowe M (2009) A practical guide to recovery-oriented practice: tools for transforming mental health care. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 17.Anthony WA (2000) A recovery-oriented service system: setting some system level standards. Psychiatr Rehabil J 24(2):159–168Google Scholar
- 18.Higgins A (2008) a recovery approach within the irish mental health services. a framework for development. Mental Health Commission, DublinGoogle Scholar
- 19.Nimhe (2004) Emerging best practices in mental health recovery. NIMHE, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 20.Australian Health Ministers (2009) Fourth national mental health plan: an agenda for collaborative government action in mental health 2009–2014. Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 22.Campbell-Orde T, Chamberlin J, Carpenter J, Leff HS (2005) Measuring the promise: a compendium of recovery measures, vol II. Health Services Research Institute, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 25.National Institute of Mental Health in England (2008) Outcomes compendium. National Institute of Mental Health in England, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 26.National Social Inclusion Programme (2009) Outcomes framework for mental health services. National Social Inclusion Programme, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 27.Rush AJ Jr (2008) Handbook of psychiatric measures. American Psychiatric Publishing, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 28.Reference Manager Professional Edition [computer program]. Version 11 2005Google Scholar
- 30.Russinova Z, Rogers ES, Langer Ellison M (2006) Recovery-Promoting Relationships Scale: RPRS manual. Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 34.Ellis G, King R (2003) Recovery focused interventions: perceptions of mental health consumers and their case managers. Aust e-J Adv Ment Health 2 (2)Google Scholar
- 35.Mancini AD (2006) Can recovery orientation inform the implementation of evidence-based practices? In: 114th annual convention for the American Psychological AssociationGoogle Scholar
- 37.Streiner DL, Norman GR (2008) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, vol 4. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 44.Slade M (2010) Measuring recovery in mental health services. Israel J Psychiatry 47:206–212Google Scholar
- 45.DeVellis RF (2003) Scale development: theory and applications. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 49.Gilburt H, Rose D, Slade M (2008) The importance of relationships in mental health care: a qualitative study of service users’ experiences of psychiatric hospital admission in the UK. BMC Health Serv Res (8):92Google Scholar
- 51.O’Brien AF, R. Singh, SP (2009) Disengagement from mental health services. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 44:11Google Scholar
- 52.Arbuckle RBK, Taylor J-L, Kennedy S (2011) Service user attachments to psychiatric key workers and teams. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46:9Google Scholar
- 53.Brown M, Essien P, Etim-Ubah P, Ezenwa B, Gabriel M, Hobbs T, Kinouani G, Lindsay L, Mollineau-Angoy E, Pinder D, Weig A, Wint I, Yussuf A (2008) Report of the community led research project focussing on male African and African Caribbean perspectives on recovery. Southside Partnership FanonGoogle Scholar
- 55.Department of Health (2011) No health without mental health: a cross-government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages. Department of Health, LondonGoogle Scholar