Advertisement

Service user attachments to psychiatric key workers and teams

  • Robert ArbuckleEmail author
  • Katherine Berry
  • Jayne-Louise Taylor
  • Stephanie Kennedy
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The first aim of the study was to evaluate whether self-reported attachment styles of individuals with psychosis are consistent with their self-reported attachment in therapeutic relationships with both key workers and mental health teams. The second aim was to evaluate the level of concordance in attachment ratings given by different raters (self-report, key worker informant-report and team informant-report).

Methods

Three self-report versions of the Psychosis Attachment Measure (PAM; attachment in general relationships, attachment towards key worker and attachment in relation to the mental health team) were administered to 24 individuals with a diagnosis of psychosis in psychiatric rehabilitation settings. Key worker and ‘team’ informant versions of the PAM were also completed.

Results

There were strong, significant correlations among the three self-reported attachment measures. There was less consistent evidence of correlations between key worker ratings of attachment and self-report attachment ratings. The majority of the correlations between team ratings of attachment and self-report attachment were small and non-significant.

Conclusions

Strong correlations among the self-reported PAM scales suggest that self-reported attachment in specific therapeutic relationships is consistent with self-reported attachment in general relationships. The self-ratings were not consistently correlated with informant-ratings and team informant ratings were particularly poorly correlated with self-ratings. This suggests that it is vital that teams consult service users themselves when making decisions about their care.

Keywords

Psychosis Attachment Therapeutic relationships Measurement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Julie Hird for her input into the early stages of the project. Thanks also to the psychologists, psychiatrists and nurses at the Edenfield, Bowness and Bramley St Centres for their help identifying and recruiting service users and for their time completing the team and key worker measures. Finally, we would like to thank the services users who agreed to participate and gave up their time to complete the self-report questionnaires.

References

  1. 1.
    Bowlby J (1980) Attachment and loss, vol 3. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shaver PR, Mikulincer M (2002) Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment Hum Dev 4:133–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bentall RP, Corcoran R, Howard R, Blackwood R, Kinderman P (2001) Persecutory delusions: a review and theoretical integration. Clin Psych Rev 21:1143–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gumley A, Schwannauer M (2006) Staying well after psychosis. A cognitive interpersonal approach to recovery and relapse prevention. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berry K, Barrowclough C, Wearden A (2007) A review of the role of adult attachment style in psychosis: unexplored issues and questions for further research. Clin Psych Rev 27(4):458–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ponizovsky AM, Nechamkin Y, Rosca P (2007) Attachment patterns are associated with symptomatology and course of schizophrenia in male inpatients. Am J Orthopsych 77:324–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berry K, Barrowclough C, Wearden A (2008) Attachment theory: a framework for understanding symptoms and interpersonal relationships in psychosis. Behav Res Ther 46:1275–1282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berry K, Wearden A, Barrowclough C (2007) Adult attachment styles and psychosis: an investigation of associations between general attachment styles and attachment relationships with specific others. Soc Psych Psych Epi 42:972–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berry K, Drake R (2010) The relevance of attachment theory for psychiatric rehabilitation and implications for practice. Ad Psych Treat 16:308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holmes J (1993) Attachment theory: a biological basis for psychotherapy? Brit J Psych 163:430–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tait L, Birchwood M, Trower P (2002) A new scale (SES) to measure engagement with community mental health services. J Men Health 11:191–198Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Main M, Goldwyn R (1984) Adult attachment scoring and classification system. Unpublished manuscript, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crowell JA, Fraley RC, Shaver PR (1999) Measurement of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds) Handbook of attachment: theory research and clinical applications. Guilford Press, New York, pp 434–465Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR (1998) Self-report measurement of adult attachment: an integrative overview. In: Simpson JA, Rholes WS (eds) Attachment theory and close relationships. London, Guilford Press, pp 46–76Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goodwin I (2003) The relevance of attachment theory to the philosophy, organization and practice of adult mental health services. Clin Psych Rev 23:35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Onishi M, Gjerde PF, Block J (2001) Personality implications of romantic attachment patterns in young adults: a multi-method, multi-informant study. Per Soc Psych Bull 27:1097–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berry K, Wearden A, Barrowclough C (in press) Psychiatric staff perceptions of patient attachments: a pilot study to investigate differences in and predictors of psychiatric staff perceptions of patient attachments. Soc Psych Psych EpiGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Banai E, Weller A, Mikulincer M (2008) Inter-judge agreement in evaluation of adult attachment style: the impact of acquaintanceship. Brit J Soc Psych 37:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S (1978) Patterns of attachment: psychological study of the strange situation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adshead G (1998) Psychiatric staff as attachment figures understanding management problems in psychiatric services in the light of attachment theory. Brit J Psych 172:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM (1991) Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J Pers Soc Psych 61:226–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Killaspy H, Harden C, Holloway F, King M (2005) What do mental health rehabilitation services do and what are they for? A national survey in England. J Men Health 14:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berry K, Wearden A, Barrowclough C, Liversidge T (2006) Attachment styles, interpersonal relationships and psychotic phenomena in a non-clinical student sample. Pers Indiv Diff 41:707–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berry K, Band R, Corcoran R, Barrowclough C, Wearden A (2007) Attachment styles, earlier interpersonal relationships and schizotypy in a non-clinical sample. Psych Psycho Theory Res Pract 80:563–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Berry K, Wearden A, Barrowclough C (2007) Adult attachment styles and psychosis: an investigation of associations between general attachment styles and attachment relationships with specific others. Soc Psych Psych Epi 42:972–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berry K, Barrowclough C, Wearden A (2008) Attachment theory: a framework for understanding symptoms and interpersonal relationships in psychosis. Behav Res Therapy 46:1275–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Addington D, Addington J, Schissel B (1990) A depression rating scale for schizophrenics. Schiz Res 3:247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Haddock G, McCarron J, Tarrier N, Faragher EB (1999) Scales to measure dimensions of hallucinations and delusions: The Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS). Psych Med 29:879–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Achenbach TM, McConaughty SH, Howell CT (1987) Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications for cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psych Bull 101:213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tyrrell CL, Dozier M, Teague GB, Fallot RD (1999) Effective treatment relationships for person with serious psychiatric disorders: the importance of attachment states of mind. J Consult Clin Psychol 67:725–733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ma K (2006) Attachment theory in adult psychiatry. Part 1: conceptualisations, measurement and clinical research findings. Adv Psych Treat 12:440–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Macdonald E, Sauer K, Howie L, Albiston D (2005) What happens to social relationships in early psychosis? A phenomenological study of young people’s experiences. J Ment Health 14:129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Berry K, Barrowclough C, Byrne J, Purandare N (2006) Coping strategies and social support in old age psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41:280–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schomerus G, Heider D, Angermeyer MC, Bebbington PE, Azorin JM, Brugha T, Toumi M (2007) Residential area and social contacts in schizophrenia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:617–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Berry K, Drake R (2010) Attachment theory in psychiatric rehabilitation: informing clinical practice. Adv Psych Treat 16:308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Arbuckle
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katherine Berry
    • 1
  • Jayne-Louise Taylor
    • 2
  • Stephanie Kennedy
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Psychological SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Greater Manchester West Mental Health Foundation TrustManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations