Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 45, Issue 8, pp 837–842 | Cite as

Using multiple-cause-of-death data as a complement of underlying-cause-of-death data in examining mortality differences in psychiatric disorders between countries

Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the mortality differences in psychiatric disorders (PD) between countries according to multiple-cause-of-death (MCOD) data.

Objective

To compare mortality differences in PD between Taiwan and the US according to MCOD and underlying-cause-of-death (UCOD) data and factors associated with the reporting of PD and assigning PD as the UCOD.

Method

MCOD data of Taiwan and the US for years 2003 through 2005 were used for analysis. Deaths per 100,000 population for various PD by age and sex were calculated for each country. Mortality rate ratios between Taiwan and the US were computed to examine the extent of mortality differences between the countries. Odds ratios in reporting PD and assigning PD as the UCOD by age and sex for each country were estimated according logistic regression model.

Results

According to UCOD data, the PD mortality was 3.6 per 100,000 population in Taiwan and 21.9 per 100,000 population in the US, a sixfold difference. The mortality differences increased according to MCOD, which was 10.3 per 100,000 population in Taiwan and 115.4 per 100,000 population in the US, an 11-fold difference. Exception dementia/Alzheimer’s disease, the mortality differences between the countries increased in schizophrenia, mood disorder/depression, use of alcohol and use of drug according to MCOD data compared with those according to UCOD data. The percentage in reporting PD among all deaths in the US (13.9%) was higher than those in Taiwan (1.4%); however, the percentage in assigning PD as the UCOD in Taiwan (35%) was higher than those in the US (19%).

Conclusion

MCOD data could be used as a complement to UCOD data to provide more information (such as percentage of reporting PD and assigning PD as the UCOD) in interpreting mortality differences in PD between the countries.

Keywords

Death certificates Cause of death Psychiatric disorders Mortality 

References

  1. 1.
    Balkau B, Jougla E, Papoz L, the Eurodiab Subarea C Study Group (1993) European study of the certification and coding of causes of death of six clinical case histories of diabetic patients. Int J Epidemiol 22:116–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown S, Inskip H, Barraclough B (2000) Causes of the excess mortality of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 177:212–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chien IC, Chou YJ, Lin CH, Bih SH, Chou P (2004) Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among national health insurance enrollees in Taiwan. Psychiatr Serv 55:691–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilson AM, Ryan KM, Joranson DE, Dahl JL (2004) A reassessment of trends in the medical use and abuse of opioid analgesics and implications for diversion control: 1997–2002. J Pain Symptom Manage 28:176–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldacre MJ, Duncan ME, Cook-Mozaffari P, Griffith M (2003) Trends in mortality rates comparing underlying-cause and multiple-cause coding in an English population 1979–1998. J Public Health Med 25:249–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldacre MJ, Duncan ME, Griffith M, Cook-Mozaffari P (2006) Psychiatric disorders certified on death certificates in an English population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41:409–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hwu HG, Yeh EK, Chang LY (1989) Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in Taiwan defined by the Chinese diagnostic interview schedule. Acta Psychiatr Scand 79:136–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Israel RA, Rosenberg HM, Curtin LR (1986) Analytical potential for multiple cause-of-death data. Am J Epidemiol 124:161–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelson M, Farebrother M (1987) The effect of inaccuracies in death certification and coding practices in the European economic community (EEC) on international cancer mortality statistics. Int J Epidemiol 16:411–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lu TH (2003) Using ACME (automatic classification of medical entry) software to monitor and improve the quality of cause of death statistics. J Epidemiol Community Health 57:470–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu TH, Anderson RN, Shu PY, Huang CN (2005) Mortality and causes of death in a national sample of diabetic patients in Taiwan: response to Tseng. Diabetes Care 28:1266–1267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lu TH, Tsau SM, Wu TC (2005) ACME (Automated Classification of Medical Entities) system could help objectively assessing the appropriateness of underlying cause of death certification and assignment. J Clin Epidemiol 58:1277–1281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lu TH, Walker S, Johannson LA, Huang CN (2005) An international comparison study indicated physicians’ habits in reporting diabetes in part I of death certificate affected reported national diabetes mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 58:1150–1157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manchikanti L (2008) Prescription drug abuse: what is being done to address this new drug epidemic? Testimony before the subcommittee on criminal justice, drug policy and human resources. Pain Physician 9:287–321Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    National center for health statistics (2003) physicians’ handbook on medical certification of death. US Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    National Center for Health Statistics (2008) Vital statistics data available online: mortality multiple cause files. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/dvs/Vitalstatsonline.htm
  17. 17.
    Paulozzi LJ, Budnitz DS, Xi Y (2006) Increasing deaths from opioid analgesics in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 15:618–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Redelings MD, Wise M, Sorvillo F (2007) Using multiple cause-of-death data to investigate associations and causality between conditions listed on the death certificate. Am J Epidemiol 166:104–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reid DD, Rose GA (1964) Assessing the comparability of mortality statistics. BMJ 2:1437–1439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wall MM, Huang J, Oswald J, McCullen D (2005) Factors associated with reporting multiple cause of death. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:4Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    World Health Organization (1992) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, tenth revision. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Public Health, College of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
  2. 2.TainanTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryChi-Mei Medical CenterTainanTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of PsychiatryTaipei Medical UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations