Abstract
Background
Legislation to establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was passed soon after election of South Africa’s first democratic government. Discourse around the TRC focused on the importance of bearing witness to the past, and on the healing powers of forgiveness. However, there was also a concern that individuals with TRC relevant experience would simply be re-traumatized by participation in the process. To date, there has been little empirical data for either hypothesis.
Methods
A nationally representative survey of the South African population (n = 4,351) was undertaken 6–8 years after the TRC process began. Information about subjects’ exposure to and participation in the TRC was collected, and views about the testimony of survivors and perpetrators were assessed. To determine the predictors of distress, anger, and forgiveness, linear regressions were undertaken with inclusion of demographic variables, exposure to TRC variables, and attitudes to the TRC.
Results
Distress was significantly associated with specific demographic factors (female gender, less education), with having a TRC-related experience to share, and with negative perceptions of the TRC (a negative view of survivors’ testimony). Anger had similar associations but was also predicted by lower age. Forgiveness was associated with age and education, with being Coloured, and with having a positive view of perpetrator’s testimony, while it was inversely associated with having a TRC experience to share. Distress and anger correlated inversely with forgiveness. Perceptions of the TRC were moderately positive irrespective of many demographic variables (race, education, age).
Conclusion
In this cross-sectional study, causal relationships are difficult to ascertain. Nevertheless, relationships between increased distress/anger, having a TRC relevant experience to share, and negative perceptions of the TRC, support a view that bearing testimony is not necessarily helpful to survivors. However, in the population as a whole, moderately positive attitudes towards the TRC across sociodemographic variables support a view that the TRC helped provide knowledge and acknowledgment of the past.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agger I, Jensen JB (1990) Testimony as ritual and evidence in psychotherapy for political refugees. J Trauma Stress 3:115–130
Allan A, Allan MM, Kaminer D, Stein DJ (2006) Exploration of the association between apology and forgiveness amongst victims of human rights violations. Behav Sci Law 24:87–102
Ash TG (1997) True confessions. NY Rev Books 17(July):33–38
Asmal K, Asmal L, Roberts RS (1996) Reconciliation through truth: a reckoning of Apartheid’s criminal governance. David Phillip, Cape Town
Baldwin-Ragaven L, London L, De Gruchy J (2000) Learning from our apartheid past: human rights challenges for health professionals in contemporary South Africa. Ethn Health 5:227–241
Ballenger JC, Davidson JR, Lecrubier Y, Nutt DJ, Foa EB, Kessler RC, McFarlane AC, Shalev AY (2000) Consensus statement on posttraumatic stress disorder from the International Consensus Group on Depression and Anxiety. J Clin Psychiatry 61S5:60–66
Boraine A (1996) Justice in cataclysm: Criminal tribunals in the wake of mass violence. Lecture in Belgium
Boraine A, Levy J (1995) The healing of a nation? IDASA, Cape Town
Boraine A, Levy J, Scheffer R (1997) Dealing with the past: truth and reconciliation in South Africa, 2nd edn. Cape Town, IDASA
Byrne CC (2004) Benefit or burden: victims’ reflections on TRC participation. J Peace Psychol 10:237–256
Cienfuegos AJ, Monelli C (1983) The testimony of political repression as a therapeutic instrument. Am J Orthopsychiatry 53:43–51
Hamber B (2000) Repairing the irreparable: dealing with the double-binds of making reparations for crimes of the past. Ethn Health 5:215–226
Kaminer D, Stein DJ, Mbanga I, Zungu-Dirwayi N (2001) The Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa: relation to psychiatric status and forgiveness among survivors of human rights abuses. Br J Psychiatry 178:373–377
Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SLT, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 32:959–976
Rose S, Bisson J, Churchill R, Wessely S (2002) Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000560
Stein DJ, Swartz L, Walaza N (2000) Mental health beyond the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Ethn Health, Vol. 5
Stein DJ (1998) Psychiatric aspects of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa. Br J Psychiatry 173:455–457
Toussaint LL, Williams DR, Musick MA, Everson SA (2001) Forgiveness and health: age differences in a U.S. probability sample. J Adult Dev 8:249–257
Williams DR, Herman A, Kessler RC, Sonnega J, Seedat S, Stein DJ, Moomal H, Wilson CM (2004) The South Africa Stress and Health Study: rationale and design. Metab Brain Dis 19:135–147
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by MH 59575 from the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute of Drug Abuse and by the Department of Mental Health, Ministry of Health in South Africa. Dan Stein and Soraya Seedat are also supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) of South Africa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stein, D.J., Seedat, S., Kaminer, D. et al. The impact of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on psychological distress and forgiveness in South Africa. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 43, 462–468 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0350-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0350-0