Skip to main content

No evidence for restrictive care practices in Māori admitted to a New Zealand psychiatric inpatient unit: do specialist cultural teams have a role?

Abstract

Objective

To ascertain the presence, and describe the pattern and extent, of restrictive care practices in the treatment of mental health inpatients in a rural New Zealand unit.

Methods

Retrospective data was anonymously extracted from patient records at Rotorua Hospital (Rotorua, New Zealand). Data sets were compiled from 300 consecutive patient admissions between January 2000 and December 2001. The demographic and diagnostic characteristics extracted were gender, age, ethnicity (Māori or non-Māori classification only), primary diagnosis, length of hospital stay, seclusion, medication on discharge, dosage of antipsychotic medication if given, referral to psychotherapy, voluntary/involuntary status on admission, and readmission rates.

Results

After controlling for other clinical variables, ethnicity was not associated with specific diagnoses, increased use of seclusion, and involuntary status on admission or higher readmission rates. Māori patients were more likely to receive antipsychotic medication and at higher doses than non-Māori. Māori were less likely to be referred to psychotherapy services and had shorter lengths of stay.

Conclusion

There was no evidence of widespread restrictive care practices against Māori, although the disparities in antipsychotic prescription and psychotherapy referral suggest some restrictive care practices do exist. The use of specialist cultural teams in general mental health services may prevent restrictive care practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold LM, Strakowski SM, Schwiers ML et al (2004) Sex, ethnicity, and antipsychotic medication use in patients with psychosis. Schizophr Res 66:169–175

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bodley JH (1990) Victims of progress, 3rd edn. Māyfield, Mountain View

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breakey WR, Dunn GJ (2004) Racial disparity in the use of ECT for affective disorders. Am J Psychiatry 161:1635–1641

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter MD, Hannon VR, McCleery G, Wanderling JA (1988) Variations in seclusion and restraint practices by hospital location. Hosp Community Psychiatry 39:418–423

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chong S, Sachdev P, Māhendran R, Chua H (2000) Neuroleptic and anticholinergic drug use in Chinese patients with schizophrenia resident in a state psychiatric hospital in Singapore. Aust NZ J Psych 34:988–991

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dein S, Lipsedge M (1998) Negotiating across class, culture, and religion: psychiatry in the English inner city. In: Okpaku SO (ed) Clinical methods in transcultural psychiatry. American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, pp 137–154

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donovan A, Plant R, Peller A, Siegel L, Mārtin A (2003) Two-year trends in the use of seclusion and restraint among psychiatrically hospitalized youths. Psychiatr Serv 54:987–993

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Durie MH (1994) Māori Psychiatric Admission: patterns and policy implications. In: Spicer J, Trlin A, Watson J (eds) Social dimensions of health and illness; New Zealand perspectives. Dunmore Press, Palmerston North

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gaines P, Bower A, Buckingham B, Eagar K, Burgess P, Green J (2003) Mental health classification and outcomes study: final report. Health Research Council, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  11. Galletly CA (1992) Antipsychotic drug doses in a schizophrenia inpatient unit. Aust NZ J Psych 26:574–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobson N, Greenley D (2001) What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication. Psychiatric Services 52:481–485

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, Koivisto A, Lönnqvist J, Kaltiala-Heino R (2007) A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:747–752

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kjellin L, Høyer G, Engberg M, Kaltiala-Heino R, Sigurjónsdóttir M (2006) Differences in perceived coercion at admission to psychiatric hospitals in the Nordic countries. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41:241–247

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krawitz R, Watson C (1997) Gender, race and poverty: bringing the socio-political into psychotherapy. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 31:474–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar S, Oakley-Browne M. Usefulness of the construct of Social Network to explain higher mental health service utilisation by Māori population in New Zealand. Transcultural Psychiatry (in press)

  17. Leslie LK, Weckerly J, Landsverk J, Hough RL, Hurlburt MS, Wood PA (2003) Racial/ethnic differences in the use of psychotropic medication in high-risk children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42:1433–1442

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lloyd K, Moodley P (1992) Psychotropic medication and ethnicity: an inpatient survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 27:95–101

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lorant V, Depuydt C, Gillain B, Guillet A, Dubois V (2007) Involuntary commitment in psychiatric care: what drives the decision? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:360–365

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Opolka JL, Rascati KL, Brown CM, Gibson PJ (2004) Ethnicity and prescription patterns for haloperidol, risperidone, and olanzapine. Psychiatr Serv 55:151–156

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pilowsky LS, Ring H, Shine PJ, Battersby M, Lader M (1992) Rapid tranquillisation. A survey of emergency prescribing in a general psychiatric hospital. B J Psych 160:831–835

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Simpson AI, Brinded PM, Fairley N, Laidlaw TM, Mālcolm F (2003) Does ethnicity affect need for mental health service among New Zealand prisoners? Aust NZ J Psychiatry 37:728–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Spector R (2001) Is there a racial bias in clinicians’ perceptions of the dangerousness of psychiatric patients? A review of the literature. J Ment Health 10:5–15

    Google Scholar 

  24. Statistics New Zealand (2002) A changing New Zealand. Statistics New Zealand, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  25. Szczepura A (2005) Access to health care for ethnic minority populations. Postgrad Med J 81:141–147

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Te Puni Kokiri (1994) Nga Ia o te Oranga Hinengaro Māori. Trends in Māori Mental Health: a discussion document. Te Puni Kokiri and Mental Health Foundation, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  27. Te Puni Kokiri (1998) Progress towards closing the social and economic gaps between Māori and Non-Māori. A report to the minister of Māori affairs. Te Puni Kokiri, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tseng W (2003) Clinician’s guide to cultural psychiatry. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  29. Valenti AM, Narendram R, Pristach CA (2003) Who are patients on conventional antipsychotics? Schizophr Bull 29:195–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wallsten T, Kjellin L, Lindström L (2006) Short-term outcome of inpatient psychiatric care—impact of coercion and treatment characteristics. Social Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41:975–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley Ng FRANZCP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Ng, B., Simpson, A. et al. No evidence for restrictive care practices in Māori admitted to a New Zealand psychiatric inpatient unit: do specialist cultural teams have a role?. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 43, 387–391 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0320-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0320-6

Key words

  • ethnic minority groups
  • restrictive care practice
  • transcultural psychiatry
  • Māori