The prevalence of postpartum depression

The relative significance of three social status indices
  • Lisa S. SegreEmail author
  • Michael W. O’Hara
  • Stephan Arndt
  • Scott Stuart



Little is known about the prevalence of clinically significant postpartum depression in women of varying social status. The purpose of the present study was to examine the prevalence of postpartum depression as a function of three indices of social status: income, education and occupational prestige.


A sample of 4,332 postpartum women completed a demographic interview and the Inventory to Diagnose Depression, a self-report scale developed to identify a major depressive episode in accordance with DSM diagnostic criteria. Logistic regression was used to assess the relative significance of the three social status variables as risk factors for postpartum depression controlling for the effects of correlated demographic variables.


In the logistic regression, income, occupational prestige, marital status, and number of children were significant predictors of postpartum depression controlling for the effects of other related demographic characteristics. The Wald Chi Square value for each of these significant predictors indicates that income was the strongest predictor.


The prevalence of postpartum depression was significantly higher in financially poor relative to financially affluent women. Maternal depression screening programs targeting women who are financially poor are well placed. Future research is needed to replicate the present findings in a more ethnically diverse sample that includes the full age range of teenage mothers.

Key words

postpartum depression prevalence social status income 



This work was supported by grants MH50524 and a supplement to MH59668 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD. (Drs. O’Hara and Stuart, respectively). The authors would like to thank Laura Gorman, Ph.D. for her assistance with this research.


  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd edn. Author, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DSM-IV-TR, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, VirginiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck CT (2001) Predictors of postpartum depression: an update. Nurs Res 50:275–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belle D, Doucet J (2003) Poverty, inequality, and discrimination as sources of depression among U.S. women. Psychol Women Quart 27:101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown GW, Moran PM (1997) Single mothers, poverty and depression. Psychol Med 27:21–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dearing E, Taylor BA, McCartney K (2004) Implications of family income dynamics for women’s depressive symptoms during the first 3 years after childbirth. Am J Public Health 94:1372–1377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diener E, Biswas-Diener R (2002) Will money increase subjective well-being? Soc Indic Res 57:119–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dohrenwend BP, Dohrenwend BS (1969) Social status and psychological disorder: A causal inquiry. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dohrenwend BP, Schwartz S (1995) Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 8:138–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Evans GW, English K (2002) The environment of poverty: multiple stressor exposure, psychophysiological stress, and socioemotional adjustment. Child Dev 73:1238–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T (2005) Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol 106:1071–1083PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldston DB, O’Hara MW, Schartz HA (1990) Reliability, validity, and preliminary normative data for the inventory to diagnose depression in a college population. Psychol Assessment 2:212–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gross KH, Wells CS, Radigan-Garcia A, Dietz PM (2002) Correlates of self-reports of being very depressed in the months after delivery: results from the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system. Matern Child Health J 6:247–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hobfoll SE, Ritter C, Lavin J, Hulsizer MR, Cameron RP (1995) Depression prevalence and incidence among inner-city pregnant and postpartum women. J Consult Clin Psychol 63:445–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hollingshead AB (1975) Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Howell EA, Mora PA, Horowitz CR, Leventhal H (2005) Racial and ethnic differences in factors associated with early postpartum depressive symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 105:1442–1450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    WHO International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology (2000) Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders. Bull World Health Organ 78:413–426Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kreiger N, Williams DR, Moss NE (1997) Measuring social class in U.S. public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 18:341–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lorant V, Deliege D, Eaton W, Robert A, Phillippot P, Ansseau M (2003) Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 157:98–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Hara MW, Stuart S, Gorman LL, Wenzel A (2000) Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57:1039–1045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Hara MW, Swain A (1996) Rates and risk of postpartum depression – a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:37–54Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pearlin LI (1989) The sociological study of stress. J Health Soc Behav 30:241–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pires SA, Lazear KJ (2004) Maternal depression workshop. Annie E. Casey Foundation Community Health Summit, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Segre LS, Losch ME, O’Hara MW (2006) Race/ethnicity and perinatal depressed mood. J Reproduct Infant Psychol 24:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Segre LS, O’Hara MW (2005) Screening in the U.S. healthcare system. In: Henshaw C, Elliott S (eds) Screening for perinatal depression. Jessica Kinglsey Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Surgeon General (1999) Mental health: Culture, race, ethnicity – Supplement. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    The Postpartum Depression Law (2006) NJSA 42:2–176Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Turner RJ, Wheaton B, Lloyd DA (1995) The epidemiology of social stress. Am Sociol Rev 60:104–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Uehara T, Sato T, Sakado K, Kameda K (1997) Discriminant validity of the Inventory to Diagnose Depression between patients with major depression and pure anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Res 71:57–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wells KB, Miranda J, Bauer MS, et al. (2002) Overcoming barriers to reducing the burden of affective disorders. Biol Psychiatry 52:655–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wisner KL, Peindl KS, Gigliotti T, Hanusa BH (1999) Obsessions and compulsions in women with postpartum depression. J Clin Psychiatry 60:176–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wisner KL, Wheeler SB (1994) Prevention of recurrent postpartum major depression. Hosp Community Psych 45:1191–1196Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zimmerman M, Coryell W, Corenthal C, Wilson S (1986) A self-report scale to diagnose major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43:1076–1081PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zimmerman M, Coryell W (1987) The inventory to diagnose depression (IDD): a self-report scale to diagnose major depressive disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 55:55–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa S. Segre
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael W. O’Hara
    • 1
  • Stephan Arndt
    • 2
  • Scott Stuart
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept. of PsychologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Iowa Consortium for Substance AbuseUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  3. 3.Dept. of PsychiatryUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations