Abstract
Background
A public mental health indicator scheme may be defined as a systematic collection of brief proxy measures that represent summary information on variables that are potentially influenced by or relevant to mental health systems, programmes and services. Existing public mental health indicator schemes have been developed in or for high-income countries.
Method
The paper describes and compares four existing high-income country public mental health indicator schemes and highlights key observations.
Results
The range of indicators and subclasses of indicators covered by the four existing schemes is large. There was only one item (indicator) that was covered by more than one scheme.
Conclusions
The variety of possibilities in indicators and types of indicators suggests a lack of consensus in the essential contents of an indicator scheme. There is a need for a public mental health indicator scheme that is applicable in resource-poor countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization (WHO) (2001) World Health Report 2001. Mental health: New understanding, new hope. WHO, Geneva
Bodart C, Shrestha LB (2000) Identifying information needs and indicators. In: World Health Organization (WHO). Design and implementation of health information systems. (pp. 49–72) WHO, Geneva
World Health Organization (WHO) (2000) Design and implementation of health information systems. WHO, Geneva
Grau L, West B, Gregory P (1998) “How do you feel?” Self-reported health as an indicator of current physical and mental health status. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 36:24–30
Jenkins R (1990) Towards a system of outcome indicators for mental health care. Br J Psychiatry 157:500–514
Taylor SE, Lerner JS, Sherman DK, Sage RM, McDowell NK (2003) Portrait of the self-enhancer: well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless? J Pers Soc Psychol 84:165–76
World Health Organization (WHO) (2003) Mental Health Policy, Plans and Programmes: Module. WHO, Geneva
World Health Organization (WHO) (2003) Mental Health Information Systems and Indicators: Module (draft). WHO, Geneva
Leginski WA, Croze C, Driggers J, Dumpman S, Geertsen D, Kamis-Gould E, Namerow J, patton RE, Wilson NZ, Wurster CR (1989) Data standards for mental health: Decision support systems. US Department of Health and Human services Rockville, MD
Manderscheid RW, Witkin MJ, Rosenstein MJ, Bass RD (1986) The National Reporting Program for Mental Health Statistics: history and findings. Public Health Rep 101:532–539
Glover GR, Sinclair-Smith H (2000) Computerised information systems in English mental health care providers in 1998. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 35:518–522
Kamis-Gould E, Waizer J (1992) National data standards for mental health management and performance indicators. The Psychiatric Hospital 23:23–28
Teague GB, Ganju V, Hornik JA, Johnson JR, McKinney J (1997). The MHSIP Mental Health Report Card: A consumer oriented approach to monitoring the quality of health plans. Eval Rev 21:330–341
Commission for Health Improvement (2003) Final Performance Indicators for Mental Health Trusts (2002/2003). Commission for Health Improvement http://www.chi.nhs.uk/Ratings/Trust/Indicator/indicators.asp? trustType=3 accessed on August 12 2005).
Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) (1996) The MHSIP Consumer-Oriented Report Card: Final Report of the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Task Force on a Consumer-Oriented Mental Health Report Card. MHSIP
Stakes. Minimum data set of European mental health indicators (2001) Helsinki: Stakes. ( http://www.stakes.fi/verkkojulk/pdf/minimum.pdf accessed on November 18 2003)
United States (US) Department of Health and Human Services (2000) Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd edn. 2 vols. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC. (http://www.healthypeople.gov/Document/HTML/Volume2/18Mental.htm)
Eisen SV, Shaul JA, Leff HS, Stringfellow VL, Clarridge BR, Cleary PD (2001) Toward a National Consumer Survey: Evaluation of the CABHS and MHSIP Instruments. J Behav Health Serv Res 28:347–369
Shaul, JA, Eisen SV, Clarridge BR, Stringfellow BL, Fowler FJ, Claery PD, in collaboration with the ECHO development team (2001) Experiences of Care and Health Outcomes (ECHO) Survey: Field Test report
National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Research Institute, Inc (1998) Five-State Feasibility Study on State mental Health Agency Performance Measures. NASMHPD Research Institute
Lutterman T, Ganju V, Schacht L, Shaw R, Mohikan K et al. (2003) Sixteen State Study on Mental Health Performance Measures. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 03–3835. Centre for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Rockville, MD
National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research (NASMHPD) President’s Task Force on Performance Measures Technical Workgroup (1998) Performance Measures for Mental Health Systems: A Standardized Framework. NASMHPD Research Institute
Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) (2003) MHSIP Mental Health Quality Report (draft). MHSIP. (http://www.mhsip.org/reportcard/reportcard.html , accessed 20 October 2003)
United States (US) Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1979) Healthy People: the Surgeon’s General Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Public Health Service, US Government Printing Office, Washington
United States (US) Department of Health and Human Services (1991) Healthy People: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Public Health Service, Washington
National Center for Health Statistics (2003) DATA 2010: the Healthy People 2010 Database. Centres of Disease Control Atlanta. ( http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/otheract/hpdata2010/aboutdata2010.htm accessed on November 19 2003)
Thornicroft G, Tansella M (1999) The mental health matrix: A manual to improve services. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Heine SJ, Lehman DR, Markus HR, Kitayama S (1999) Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychol Rev 106:766–794
Held BS (2002) The tyranny of the positive attitude in America: observation and speculation. J Clin Psychol 58:965–991
World Health Organization (WHO) (2005) WHO Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO-AIMS). WHO, Geneva http://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/WHO-AIMS/en/index.html
Saxena S, Lora A, van Ommeren M, Barrett T, Morris J, Saraceno B (in preparation) WHO Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems: rationale and development process
Ginsberg PE (1984) The dysfunctional side effects of quantitative indicator production: illustration from mental health care (a message from Chicken Little). Eval Program Plan 7:1–26
Hendryx MS, Teague GB (2001) Comparing alternative risk-adjustment models. J Behav Health Serv Res 28:247–257
Weissman EM, Rosenheck RA, Essock SM (2002) Impact of modifying risk adjustment models on rankings of access to care in the VA mental health report card. Psychiatr Serv 53:1153–1158
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saxena, S., van Ommeren, M., Lora, A. et al. Monitoring of mental health systems and services. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 41, 488–497 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0053-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0053-3