Abstract
Background
Cross-cultural use of the cutoff points determined in Indo-Chinese refugees of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) and the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ) is common in refugee mental health research but it might have caused misclassifications.
Methods
We assessed the validity of the predetermined cutoff points in identifying depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) cases among Afghan refugees, with the algorithm method as a gold standard. We estimated the prevalence of depression and PTSD, using the HSCL-25 and the HTQ with the cutoff points and the algorithm method, and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the cutoff points.
Results
Nine in ten PTSD cases/non-cases were correctly identified as cases/non-cases, and nine in ten respondents classified as PTSD cases/non-cases were actually cases/non-cases. In contrast, only one in three non-depression cases was correctly identified as a non-case, and three in five respondents who were classified as depression cases was actually a case. The prevalence of depression was estimated to be 86% with the cutoff points and 53% with the algorithm method, and that of PTSD 46% and 44%, respectively.
Conclusions
The cutoff point approach might have low specificity and positive predictive value particularly for depression in our study. Cross-cultural use of the scale cutoff points determined in one cultural group to another needs to be reconsidered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hollifield M, Warner TD, Lian N et al (2002) Measuring trauma and health status in refugees: a critical review. JAMA 288:611–621
Mollica RF, Wyshak G, de-Marneffe D et al (1987) Indochinese versions of the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25: a screening instrument for the psychiatric care of refugees. Am J Psychiatry 144:497–500
Mollica RF, Caspi-Yavin Y, Bollini P et al (1992) The Harvard Trauma Questionnaire: validating a cross-cultural instrument for measuring torture, trauma, and post-traumatic stress disorder in Indochinese refugees. J Nerv Ment Dis 180:111–116
Mollica RF, McInnes K, Sarajlic N et al (1999) Disability associated with psychiatric comorbidity and health status in Bosnian refugees living in Croatia. JAMA 282:433–439
Mollica RF, Sarajlic N, Chernoff M et al (2001) Longitudinal study of psychiatric symptoms, disability, mortality, and emigration among Bosnian refugees. JAMA 286:546–554
Flaherty JA, Gaviria FM, Pathak D et al (1988) Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. J Nerv Ment Dis 176:257–263
Westermeyer J (1985) Psychiatric diagnosis across cultural boundaries. Am J Psychiatry 142:798–805
Shrout PE, Dohrenwend BP, Levav I (1986) A discriminant rule for screening cases of diverse diagnostic types: preliminary results. J Consult Clin Psychol 54:314–319
Dohrenwend BP (1990) ‘The problem of validity in field studies of psychological disorders’ revisited. Psychol Med 20:195–208
Dohrenwend BP (1998) A psychosocial perspective on the past and future of psychiatric epidemiology. Am J Epdeimiol 147:222–231
Insel TR, Fenton WS (2005) Psychiatry epidemiology: it’s not just about counting anymore. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:590–592
Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Walters EE (2005) Prevalence, Severity, and Comorbidity of 12-Month DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:617–627
Ichikawa M, Nakahara S, Wakai S (in press) Effect of post-migration detention on mental health among Afghan asylum seekers in Japan. Aust N Z J Psychiatry
Acknowledgements
We thank all the participants of this study and acknowledge the generous cooperation of the group of lawyers representing Afghan asylum seekers in Japan, the Japan Association for Refugees, and the Catholic Osaka Archdiocese Social Action Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ichikawa, M., Nakahara, S. & Wakai, S. Cross-cultural use of the predetermined scale cutoff points in refugee mental health research. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 41, 248–250 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0016-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0016-2