Neuroticism: a non-informative marker of vulnerability to psychopathology
- 1.7k Downloads
Neuroticism measures are very popular in psychopathological research, but it is unclear how useful neuroticism is in studies of the aetiology of psychopathology.
A conceptual examination was made of the literature on the association of neuroticism and psychopathology, the ontological status of neuroticism, the purport of neuroticism questionnaires, and causal issues.
The research on which neuroticism is built has historically been based solely on the factor analyses of the common adjectives used to describe usual behaviours. An abundance of studies have shown that neuroticism scores predict life stress, psychological distress, emotional disorders, psychotic symptoms, substance abuse, physical tension-related symptoms, medically unexplained physical symptoms, and health care utilisation. This evidence suggests that neuroticism scales index vulnerability to many forms of negative affect and psychiatric disorder. However, the associations do not clarify the nature of this vulnerability nor the underlying psychobiological mechanisms. We present evidence that neuroticism scores reflect a person’s characteristic (or mean) level of distress over a protracted period of time. In this perspective, even prospective associations of neuroticism with mental health outcomes are basically futile, and largely tautological since scores on any characteristic with substantial within-subject stability will predict, by definition, that characteristic and related variables at later points in time.
Neuroticism is not an explanatory concept in the aetiology of psychopathology, since it measures a person’s characteristic level of distress over a protracted period of time. This situation will not change until knowledge becomes available about: (i) the mechanisms that produce high neuroticism scores (and, therefore, also psychopathology) and (ii) its neurobiological substrate. Only then will we understand why neuroticism appears to ‘predict’ the outcomes it predicts.
Key wordsneuroticism negative affectivity psychopathology physical health explanatory power causality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Cacioppo JT (1994) Social neuroscience: autonomic, neuroendocrine, and immune responses to stress. Psychophysiol 31:113–128Google Scholar
- 10.Cloninger CR (1986) A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatr Developm 4:167–226Google Scholar
- 11.Cloninger CR, Przybeck TR, Svrakic DM, Wetzel RD (1994) The temperament and character inventory (TCI): a guide to its development and use. Center for Psychobiology of Personality, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
- 19.Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR (1992b) The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. J Pers Dis 6:343–359Google Scholar
- 22.Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG (1968) Manual for the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Educational and Testing Service: San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- 30.Goldsmith HH, Buss AH, Plomin R, Rothbart MK (1987) What is temperament? Four approaches. Child Dev 58:509–529Google Scholar
- 37.ten Have M, Oldehinkel AJ, Vollebergh W, Ormel J (2004) Does neuroticism explain variations in care service use for mental health problems in the general population? Results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). in press, 2004Google Scholar
- 43.Kagan J, Reznick JS, Snidman N (1987) Temperamental variation in response to the unfamiliar. In: Krasnegor NA, Blass EM (eds) Perinatal development: A psychobiological perspective. Academic Press, San Diego. Behav Biol, pp 421–440Google Scholar
- 47.Kirschbaum C, Hellhammer DH (1989) Salivary cortisol in psychobiological research: an overview. Neuropsychobiol 22:150–169Google Scholar
- 49.Loehlin JC (1992) Genes and environment in personality development. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 70.Tellegen A (1985) Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In: Hussain Tuma A, Maser J (eds) Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 681–706Google Scholar
- 75.Widiger TA, Trull TJ (1992) Personality and psychopathology: an application of the five-factor model. J Pers 60:363–393Google Scholar