Skip to main content
Log in

Comments on the notion of false positivity in measurements of autoantibodies. Reply to Grill V, Sørgjerd E, Hals I, Carlsson S [letter]

  • Letter
  • Published:
Diabetologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Grill V, Sørgjerd E, Hals I, Carlsson S (2023) Comments on the notion of false positivity in measurements of autoantibodies. Diabetologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-06061-9

  2. Mallett S, Halligan S, Thompson M, Collins GS, Altman DG (2012) Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care. BMJ 345:e3999. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e3999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Suurmond J, Diamond B (2015) Autoantibodies in systemic autoimmune diseases: specificity and pathogenicity. J Clin Invest 125(6):2194–2202. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI78084

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams AJ, Lampasona V, Schlosser M et al (2015) Detection of antibodies directed to the N-terminal region of GAD is dependent on assay format and contributes to differences in the specificity of GAD autoantibody assays for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 64(9):3239–3246. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-1693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas NJ, Jones AG (2023) The challenges of identifying and studying type 1 diabetes in adults. Diabetologia 66(12):2200–2212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-06004-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones AG, McDonald TJ, Shields BM, Hagopian W, Hattersley AT (2021) Latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA) is likely to represent a mixed population of autoimmune (type 1) and nonautoimmune (type 2) diabetes. Diabetes Care 44:1243–1251. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Steck AK, Vehik K, Bonifacio E et al (2015) Predictors of progression from the appearance of islet autoantibodies to early childhood diabetes: The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY). Diabetes Care 38(5):808–813. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-2426

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Grace SL, Bowden J, Walkey HC et al (2022) Islet autoantibody level distribution in type 1 diabetes and their association with genetic and clinical characteristics. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 107(12):e4341–e4349. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgac507

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angus G. Jones.

Ethics declarations

Contribution statement

Both authors were responsible for drafting the article and reviewing it critically for important intellectual content. Both authors approved the version to be published.

Authors’ relationships and activities

The authors declare that there are no relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, N.J., Jones, A.G. Comments on the notion of false positivity in measurements of autoantibodies. Reply to Grill V, Sørgjerd E, Hals I, Carlsson S [letter]. Diabetologia 67, 569–570 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-06062-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-06062-8

Navigation