Advertisement

Diabetologia

pp 1–15 | Cite as

Breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Dominika Bhatia
  • Iliana C. Lega
  • Wei Wu
  • Lorraine L. LipscombeEmail author
Article

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Individuals with diabetes are at increased risk of developing and dying from cancer. Evidence-based guidelines recommend universal screening for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer; however, evidence on the uptake of these tests in individuals with diabetes is mixed. We conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the association between diabetes and participation in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched systematically for publications between 1 January 1997 and 18 July 2018. The search was supplemented by handsearching of reference lists of the included studies and known literature reviews. Abstracts and full texts were assessed in duplicate according to the following eligibility criteria: study conducted in the general population; diabetes included as a predictor vs a comparison group without diabetes; and breast (mammography), cervical (Papanicolaou smear) or colorectal (faecal and endoscopic tests) cancer screening uptake included as an outcome. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the most-adjusted estimates for each cancer site.

Results

Thirty-seven studies (25 cross-sectional, 12 cohorts) were included, with 27 studies on breast, 19 on cervical and 18 on colorectal cancer screening. Having diabetes was associated with significantly lower likelihood of breast (adjusted OR 0.83 [95% CI 0.77, 0.90]) and cervical (OR 0.76 [95% CI 0.71, 0.81]) cancer screening, relative to not having diabetes. Colorectal cancer screening was comparable across groups with and without diabetes (OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.86, 1.06]); however, women with diabetes were less likely to receive a colorectal cancer screening test than women without diabetes (OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.77, 0.97]).

Conclusions/interpretation

Our findings suggest that women with diabetes have suboptimal breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening rates, compared with women without diabetes, although the absolute differences might be modest. Given the increased risk of cancer in this population, higher quality prospective evidence is necessary to evaluate the contribution of diabetes to cancer screening disparities in relation to other patient-, provider- and system-level factors.

Registration

PROSPERO registration ID CRD42017073107.

Keywords

Breast cancer Cancer screening Cervical cancer Colorectal cancer Diabetes management Diabetes mellitus Healthcare barriers Healthcare disparities Meta-analysis Systematic review 

Abbreviations

FIT

Faecal immunochemical test

FOBT

Faecal occult blood test

NOS

Newcastle–Ottawa Scale

Pap

Papanicolaou

PR

Prevalence ratio

RCT

Randomised controlled trial

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank V. Lui (Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto) for her guidance in the design of the electronic database search strategy. DB is supported by the Enid Walker Award in Women’s Health Research from Women’s College Hospital. LL is supported by the Diabetes Investigator Award from Diabetes Canada.

Contribution statement

DB, IL and LL conceived and designed the study. WW provided methodological and statistical advice. IL and LL provided clinical guidance in interpreting the results. DB, WW and IL assessed citations for eligibility and risk of bias. DB was involved in data abstraction, synthesis and drafting of the first version of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to subsequent revisions and approved the final manuscript. All authors had full access to the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Duality of interest

The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Supplementary material

125_2019_4995_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (515 kb)
ESM (PDF 515 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424.  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tsilidis KK, Kasimis JC, Lopez DS, Ntzani EE, Ioannidis JPA (2015) Type 2 diabetes and cancer: umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies. BMJ 350:g7607.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Larsson SC, Mantzoros CS, Wolk A (2007) Diabetes mellitus and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 121(4):856–862.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22717 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A (2005) Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(22):1679–1687.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji375 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barone BB, Yeh HC, Snyder CF et al (2008) Long-term all-cause mortality in cancer patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 300(23):2754.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2008.824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lipscombe LL, Fischer HD, Austin PC et al (2015) The association between diabetes and breast cancer stage at diagnosis: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 150(3):613–620.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3323-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peairs KS, Barone BB, Snyder CF et al (2011) Diabetes mellitus and breast cancer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 29(1):40–46.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fleming ST, Pursley HG, Newman B, Pavlov D, Chen K (2005) Comorbidity as a predictor of stage of illness for patients with breast cancer. Med Care 43(2):132–140.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200502000-00006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Srokowski TP, Fang S, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH (2009) Impact of diabetes mellitus on complications and outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(13):2170–2176.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5935 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Worndl E, Fung K, Fischer HD, Austin PC, Krzyzanowska MK, Lipscombe LL (2018) Preventable diabetic complications after a cancer diagnosis in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2(1) pky008. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jncics/article/doi/10.1093/jncics/pky008/4995319, accessed 14 Nov 2018
  11. 11.
    van de Poll-Franse LV, Houterman S, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Dercksen MW, Coebergh JWW, Haak HR (2007) Less aggressive treatment and worse overall survival in cancer patients with diabetes: a large population based analysis. Int J Cancer 120(9):1986–1992.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22532 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gross CP, McAvay GJ, Guo Z, Tinetti ME (2007) The impact of chronic illnesses on the use and effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. Cancer 109(12):2410–2419.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark AM, Raine K, Raphael D (2004) The American Cancer Society, American Diabetes Association, and American Heart Association joint statement on preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: where are the social determinants? Diabetes Care 27(12):3024–3024.  https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.12.3024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davidson LE, Hudson R, Kilpatrick K et al (2009) Effects of exercise modality on insulin resistance and functional limitation in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA Intern Med 169(2):122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. AICR, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barclay AW, Petocz P, McMillan-Price J et al (2008) Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk—a meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Clin Nutr 87(3):627–637.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/87.3.627 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sasco AJ, Secretan MB, Straif K (2004) Tobacco smoking and cancer: a brief review of recent epidemiological evidence. Lung Cancer 45:S3–S9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.07.998 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M (2008) Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet 37(9612):569-578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schienkiewitz A, Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Kroke A, Boeing H Body mass index history and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam study. Am J Clin Nutr 84(2):427–433.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/84.2.427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pischon T, Lahmann PH, Boeing H et al (2006) Body size and risk of colon and rectal cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). J Natl Cancer Inst 98(13):920–931.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj246 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pisani P (2008) Hyper-insulinaemia and cancer, meta-analyses of epidemiological studies. Arch Physiol Biochem 114(1):63–70.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13813450801954451 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goodwin PJ (2008) Insulin in the adjuvant breast cancer setting: a novel therapeutic target for lifestyle and pharmacologic interventions? J Clin Oncol 26(6):833–834.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7132 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson JA, Carstensen B, Witte D et al (2012) on behalf of the Diabetes and Cancer Research Consortium. Diabetes and cancer (1): evaluating the temporal relationship between type 2 diabetes and cancer incidence. Diabetologia 55(6):1607–1618.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2525-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ (2013) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Available from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub5, accessed 14 November 2018
  25. 25.
    Peirson L, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ciliska D, Warren R (2013) Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2:35. Available from: http://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2046-4053-2-35, accessed 14 November 2018
  26. 26.
    Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA et al (2016) Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 315(23):2576.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.3332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siu AL, on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2016) Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 164(4):279–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oeffinger KC, Fontham ETH, Etzioni R et al (2015) Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA 314(15):1599–1614.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.12783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2011) Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years. Can Med Assoc J 183(17):1991–2001.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D et al (2015) Breast-cancer screening: viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med 372(24):2353–2358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moyer VA (2012) Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 156(12):880.  https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW et al (2012) American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 137(4):516–542.  https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPTGD94EVRSJCG CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2013) Recommendations on screening for cervical cancer. Can Med Assoc J 185(1):35–45.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.121505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bénard F, Barkun AN, Martel M, von Renteln D (2018) Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: summarizing the current global recommendations. World J Gastroenterol 24(1):124–138.  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    World Health Organization (2005) Cervix cancer screening. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=73529, accessed 14 November 2018
  36. 36.
    Dowling EC, Klabunde C, Patnick J, Ballard-Barbash R, for The International Cancer Screening Network (ICSN). Breast and cervical cancer screening programme implementation in 16 countries. J Med Screen 2010;17(3):139–146.  https://doi.org/10.1258/jms.2010.010033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Williams JH, Carter SM, Rychetnik L (2014) ‘Organised’ cervical screening 45 years on: how consistent are organised screening practices? Eur J Cancer 50(17):3029–3038.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.09.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Benson VS, Patnick J, Davies AK, Nadel MR, Smith RA, Atkin WS (2008) Colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries: worldwide colorectal Cancer screening. Int J Cancer 122(6):1357–1367.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23273 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schreuders EH, Ruco A, Rabeneck L et al (2015) Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes. Gut 64(10):1637–1649.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-309086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Levin TR, Jamieson L, Burley DA, Reyes J, Oehrli M, Caldwell C (2011) Organized colorectal cancer screening in integrated health care systems. Epidemiol Rev 33(1):101–110.  https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxr007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Redelmeier DA, Tan SH, Booth GL (1998) The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. N Engl J Med 338(21):1516–1520.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199805213382106 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Grant RW, Pirraglia PA, Melgs JB, Singer DE (2004) Trends in complexity of diabetes care in the United States from 1991 to 2000. Arch Intern Med 164(10):1134–1139.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.10.1134 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sinnott C, Mc Hugh S, Browne J, Bradley C (2013) GPs’ perspectives on the management of patients with multimorbidity: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. BMJ Open 3(9):e003610.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003610 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA (1994) Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract 38(2):166–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Decker SL, Burt CW, Sisk JE (2009) Trends in diabetes treatment patterns among primary care providers. J Ambulatory Care Manage 32(4):333–341.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181ba6e9e CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    O’Connor AM, Perrault DJ (1995) Importance of physician’s role highlighted in survey of women’s breast screening practices. Can J Public Health Rev Can Santé Publique 86(1):42–45Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Grady KE, Lemkau JP, McVay JM, Reisine ST (1992) The importance of physician encouragement in breast cancer screening of older women. Prev Med 21(6):766–780.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(92)90083-T CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, for the PRISMA group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stroup DF (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 283(15):2008.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
  51. 51.
    Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 349:g7647.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Moher D, Stewart L, Shekelle P (2016) Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors. Syst Rev 5(1):15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0191-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Terret C, Castel-Kremer E, Albrand G, Droz JP (2009) Effects of comorbidity on screening and early diagnosis of cancer in elderly people. Lancet Oncol 10(1):80–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70336-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wools A, Dapper EA, de Leeuw JRJ (2016) Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review. Eur J Pub Health 26(1):158–168.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Diaz A, Kang J, Moore SP et al (2017) Association between comorbidity and participation in breast and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol 47:7–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.12.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bramer WM, Giustini D, de Jonge GB, Holland L, Bekhuis T (2016) De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. J Med Libr Assoc 104(3):240–243.  https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.014 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: http://handbook.Cochrane.org, accessed 25 February 2019
  58. 58.
    Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. (2019) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available from http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp, accessed 25 February 2019
  59. 59.
    Greiner KA, Daley CM, Epp A, James A, Yeh H-W, Geana M et al (2014) Implementation intentions and colorectal screening. Am J Prev Med 47(6):703–714.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Herzog R, Álvarez-Pasquin MJ, Díaz C, Del Barrio JL, Estrada JM, Gil Á (2013) Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? A systematic review. Available from http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-13-154, accessed 26 February 2019
  61. 61.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Barros AJ, Hirakata VN (2003) Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. Available from http://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-3-21, accessed 26 February 2019
  63. 63.
    Tamhane AR, Westfall AO, Burkholder GA, Cutter GR (2016) Prevalence odds ratio versus prevalence ratio: choice comes with consequences: prevalence odds ratio versus prevalence ratio. Stat Med 35(30):5730–5735.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7059 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Thompson ML, Myers JE, Kriebel D (1998) Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done? Occup Environ Med 55(4):272–277.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.55.4.272 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Jensen LF, Pedersen AF, Andersen B, Vestergaard M, Vedsted P (2015) Non-participation in breast cancer screening for women with chronic diseases and multimorbidity: a population-based cohort study. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/15/798, accessed 14 November 2018
  66. 66.
    Miller EA, Tarasenko YN, Parker JD, Schoendorf KC (2014) Diabetes and colorectal cancer screening among men and women in the USA: National Health Interview Survey: 2008, 2010. Cancer Causes Control 25(5):553–560.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-014-0360-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Dickersin K (2002) Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind? Int J Epidemiol 31(1):6–12.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/31.1.6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Egger M, Schneider M, Smith GD (1998) Meta-analysis spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 316(7125):140–144.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cummings P (2009) The relative merits of risk ratios and odds ratios. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 163(5):438.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.31 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Oluyemi AO, Welch AR, Yoo LJ, Lehman EB, McGarrity TJ, Chuang CH (2014) Colorectal cancer screening in high-risk groups is increasing, although current smokers fall behind: CRC screening in high-risk groups. Cancer 120(14):2106–2113.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Beckman TJ, Cuddihy RM, Scheitel SM, Naessens JM, Killian JM, Pankratz VS (2001) Screening mammogram utilization in women with diabetes. Diabetes Care 24(12):2049–2053.  https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.12.2049 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Blustein J, Weiss LJ (1998) The use of mammography by women aged 75 and older: factors related to health, functioning, and age. J Am Geriatr Soc 46(8):941–996.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02746.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Chan W, Yun L, Austin PC et al (2014) Impact of socio-economic status on breast cancer screening in women with diabetes: a population-based study. Diabet Med 31(7):806–812.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12422 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Katz D, Tengekyon AJ, Kahan NR, Calderon-Margalit R (2018) Patient and physician characteristics affect adherence to screening mammography: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One.13(3):e0194409,  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lipscombe LL, Hux JE, Booth GL (2005) Reduced screening mammography among women with diabetes. Arch Intern Med 165(18):2090–2095.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.18.2090 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Banks E, Beral V, Cameron R, et al. (2002) Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening. Available from http://breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/bcr418, accessed 14 November 2018
  77. 77.
    El Bcheraoui C, Basulaiman M, Wilson S, et al. (2015) Breast cancer screening in Saudi Arabia: free but almost no takers. PLoS One: 10(3):e0119051.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sanderson M, Lipworth L, Han X et al (2014) Mammography use among women with and without diabetes: results from the southern community cohort study. J Epidemiol Glob Health 4(3):223–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2014.03.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Abdullah NN, Daud S, Al-Kubaisy W, Saari IS, Saad SR (2016) Cervical cancer screening after 50: near extinction? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 206:136–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Richard A, Rohrmann S, Schmid SM et al (2015) Lifestyle and health-related predictors of cervical cancer screening attendance in a Swiss population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol 39(6):870–876.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.09.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wernli KJ, Hubbard RA, Johnson E et al (2014) Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in newly eligible men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23(7):1230–1237.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Brittain K, Murphy VP (2015) Sociocultural and health correlates related to colorectal cancer screening adherence among urban African Americans. Cancer Nurs 38(2):118–124.  https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000157 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Porter NR, Eberth JM, Samson ME, Garcia-Dominic O, Lengerich EJ, Schootman M (2012) Diabetes status and being up-to-date on colorectal cancer screening. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. 2016. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2016/15_0391.htm, accessed 14 November 2018
  84. 84.
    Singh H, Bernstein CN, Samadder JN, Ahmed R (2015) Screening rates for colorectal cancer in Canada: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open 3(2):E149–E157.  https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20140073 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Bell RA, Shelton BJ, Paskett ED (2001) Colorectal cancer screening in North Carolina: associations with diabetes mellitus and demographic and health characteristics. Prev Med 32(2):163–167.  https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2000.0785 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kiefe CI, Funkhouser E, Fouad MN, May DS (1998) Chronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 13(6):357–365.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00115.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Chuck KW, Hwang M, Choi KS, Suh M, Jun JK, Park B (2017) Cancer screening rate in people with diabetes in the Korean population: results from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2009. Epidemiol Health 39:e2017036.  https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2017036 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Constantinou P, Dray-Spira R, Menvielle G (2016) Cervical and breast cancer screening participation for women with chronic conditions in France: results from a national health survey. Available from http://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12885-016-2295-0, accessed 14 November 2018
  89. 89.
    Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Hall HI, Briss PA (2004) Nonadherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: what are the linkages to chronic disease risk? Prev Chronic Dis 1(1):1–15Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Marshall JG, Cowell JM, Campbell ES, McNaughton DB (2010) Regional variations in cancer screening rates found in women with diabetes. Nurs Res 59(1):34–41.  https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3bd07 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    López-de-Andrés A, Martin-Lopez R, Hernández-Barrera V et al (2010) Predictors of breast and cervical cancer screening in a Spanish metropolitan area. J Women’s Health 19(9):1675–1681.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Jimenez-Garcia R, Hernandez-Barrera V, Carrasco-Garrido P, Gil A (2009) Prevalence and predictors of breast and cervical cancer screening among Spanish women with diabetes. Diabetes Care 32(8):1470–1472.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0479 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Martinez-Huedo MA, Lopez de Andres A, Hernandez-Barrera V, Carrasco-Garrido P, Martinez Hernandez D, Jiménez-Garcia R (2012) Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening in Spanish women with diabetes: associated factors and trend between 2006 and 2010. Diabetes Metab 38(2):142–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2011.09.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    McBean AM, Yu X (2007) The underuse of screening services among elderly women with diabetes. Diabetes Care 30(6):1466–1472.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-2233 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Heflin MT, Oddone EZ, Pieper CF, Burchett BM, Cohen HJ (2002) The effect of comorbid illness on receipt of cancer screening by older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 50(10):1651–1658.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50456.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Fleming ST, Love MM, Bennett K (2011) Diabetes and cancer screening rates among Appalachian and non-Appalachian residents of Kentucky. J Am Board Fam Med 24(6):682–692.  https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.110094 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Fontana SA, Baumann LC, Helberg C, Love RR (1997) The delivery of preventive services in primary care practices according to chronic disease status. Am J Public Health 87(7):1190–1196.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.87.7.1190 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Hsia J, Kemper E, Kiefe C et al (2000) The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women’s Health Initiative. Prev Med 31(3):261–270.  https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2000.0697 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Jimenez-Trujillo I, Jiménez-García R, Esteban-Hernández J et al (2015) Predictors of adherence to multiple clinical preventive recommendations among adults with diabetes in Spain. PLoS One 10(6):e0131844.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Karathanasi I, Kamposioras K, Cortinovis I et al (2009) Moving ahead in diabetics’ cancer screening; food for thought from the Hellenic experience. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 18(3):255–263.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00858.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Liu BY, O’Malley J, Mori M et al (2014) The association of type and number of chronic diseases with breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. J Am Board Fam Med 27(5):669–681.  https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2014.05.140005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Owens MD, Beckles GLA, Ho KK-Y, Gorrell P, Brady J, Kaftarian JS (2008) Women with diagnosed diabetes across the life stages: underuse of recommended preventive care services. J Women’s Health 17(9):1415–1423.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2008.1125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Zhao G, Ford ES, Ahluwalia IB, Li C, Mokdad AH (2009) Prevalence and trends of receipt of cancer screenings among US women with diagnosed diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 24(2):270–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0858-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Yuan X, Liu T, Wu L, Zou Z-Y, Li C. Validity of self-reported diabetes among middle-aged and older Chinese adults: the China health and retirement longitudinal study. BMJ Open 2015;5(4):e006633–e006633,  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006633 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Pastorino S, Richards M, Hardy R et al (2015) Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort. Prim Care Diabetes 9(5):397–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2014.05.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Espelt A, Goday A, Franch J, Borrell C (2012) Validity of self-reported diabetes in health interview surveys for measuring social inequalities in the prevalence of diabetes: Table 1. J Epidemiol Community Health 66(7):e15–e15.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2010.112698 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Martin LM, Leff M, Calonge N, Garrett C, Nelson DE (2000) Validation of self-reported chronic conditions and health services in a managed care population. Am J Prev Med 18(3):215–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00158-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Schneider ALC, Pankow JS, Heiss G, Selvin E (2012) Validity and reliability of self-reported diabetes in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Epidemiol 176(8):738–743.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws156 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Howard M, Agarwal G, Lytwyn A (2009) Accuracy of self-reports of Pap and mammography screening compared to medical record: a meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control 20(1):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9228-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Ferrante JM, Ohman-Strickland P, Hahn KA et al (2008) Self-report versus medical records for assessing cancer-preventive services delivery. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17(11):2987–2994.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Gordon NP, Hiatt RA, Lampert DI (1993) Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(7):566–570.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.7.566 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Lysy Z, Booth GL, Shah BR, Austin PC, Luo J, Lipscombe LL (2013) The impact of income on the incidence of diabetes: a population-based study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 99(3):372–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2012.12.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Singh SM, Paszat LF, Li C, He J, Vinden C, Rabeneck L (2004) Association of socioeconomic status and receipt of colorectal cancer investigations: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Can Med Assoc J 171(5):461–465.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1031921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Eckstrom E, Feeny DH, Walter LC, Perdue LA, Whitlock EP (2013) Individualizing cancer screening in older adults: a narrative review and framework for future research. J Gen Intern Med 28(2):292–298.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2227-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Sterne JAC, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JPA et al (2011) Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343:d4002.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Morrison A, Polisena J, Husereau D et al (2012) The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 28(02):138–144.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462312000086 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Taksler GB, Pfoh ER, Stange KC, Rothberg MB (2018) Association between number of preventive care guidelines and preventive care utilization by patients. Am J Prev Med 55(1):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Ostbye T, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL (2005) Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med 3(3):209–214.  https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.310 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Streja DA, Rabkin SW (1999) Factors associated with implementation of preventive care measures in patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 159(3):294–302.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.159.3.294 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Cheung A, Stukel TA, Alter DA et al (2017) Primary care physician volume and quality of diabetes care: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med 166(4):240.  https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-1056 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Ioannou GN, Chapko MK, Dominitz JA (2003) Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 98(9):2082–2091.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07574.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Gancayco J, Soulos PR, Khiani V et al (2013) Age-based and sex-based disparities in screening colonoscopy use among Medicare beneficiaries. J Clin Gastroenterol 47(7):630–636.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e31828345c8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Klabunde C, Blom J, Bulliard J-L et al (2015) Participation rates for organized colorectal cancer screening programmes: an international comparison. J Med Screen 22(3):119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141315584694 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Sabatino SA, Lawrence B, Elder R et al (2012) Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Am J Prev Med 43(1):97–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Duffy SW, Myles JP, Maroni R, Mohammad A (2017) Rapid review of evaluation of interventions to improve participation in cancer screening services. J Med Screen 24(3):127–145.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141316664757 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ et al (2008) Random comparison of Guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology 135(1):82–90.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Coronado GD, Petrik AF, Vollmer WM et al (2018) Effectiveness of a mailed colorectal cancer screening outreach program in community health clinics: the STOP CRC cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 178(9):1174.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Verdoodt F, Jentschke M, Hillemanns P, Racey CS, Snijders PJF, Arbyn M (2015) Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 51(16):2375–2385.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Dijkstra MG, van Zummeren M, Rozendaal L et al (2016) Safety of extending screening intervals beyond five years in cervical screening programmes with testing for high risk human papillomavirus: 14 year follow-up of population based randomised cohort in the Netherlands. BMJ 355:i4924Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Nelson EJ, Maynard BR, Loux T, Fatla J, Gordon R, Arnold LD (2017) The acceptability of self-sampled screening for HPV DNA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 93(1):56–61.  https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2016-052609 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Rees I, Jones D, Chen H, Macleod U (2018) Interventions to improve the uptake of cervical cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: a systematic review. Prev Med 111:323–335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Beeker C, Kraft JM, Southwell BG, Jorgensen CM (2000) Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention. J Community Health 25(3):263–278.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005104406934 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Friedemann-Sánchez G, Griffin JM, Partin MR (2007) Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers and information needs. Health Expect 10(2):148–160.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00430.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Elston Lafata J, Martin S, Morlock R, Divine G, Xi H (2001) Provider type and the receipt of general and diabetes-related preventive health services among patients with diabetes. Med Care 39(5):491–499.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200105000-00009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Horný M, Glover W, Gupte G, Saraswat A, Vimalananda V, Rosenzweig J (2017) Patient navigation to improve diabetes outpatient care at a safety-net hospital: a retrospective cohort study. Available from: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-017-2700-7, accessed 14 November 2018
  136. 136.
    Nayor J, Maniar S, Chan WW (2017) Appointment-keeping behaviors and procedure day are associated with colonoscopy attendance in a patient navigator population. Prev Med 97:8–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.12.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominika Bhatia
    • 1
  • Iliana C. Lega
    • 2
  • Wei Wu
    • 2
  • Lorraine L. Lipscombe
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Women’s College Research InstituteWomen’s College HospitalTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations