Advertisement

Diabetologia

, Volume 62, Issue 3, pp 426–437 | Cite as

Ideal cardiovascular health, glycaemic status and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study

  • Joshua J. JosephEmail author
  • Aleena Bennett
  • Justin B. Echouffo Tcheugui
  • Valery S. Effoe
  • James B. Odei
  • Bertha Hidalgo
  • Akilah Dulin
  • Monika M. Safford
  • Doyle M. Cummings
  • Mary Cushman
  • April P. Carson
Article

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) is associated with lower diabetes risk. However, it is unclear whether this association is similar across glycaemic levels (normal [<5.6 mmol/l] vs impaired fasting glucose [IFG] [5.6–6.9 mmol/l]).

Methods

A secondary data analysis was performed in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. Incident diabetes was assessed among 7758 participants without diabetes at baseline (2003–2007) followed over 9.5 years. Baseline cholesterol, blood pressure, diet, smoking, physical activity and BMI were used to categorise participants based on the number (0–1, 2–3 and ≥4) of ideal CVH components. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using modified Poisson regression, adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors.

Results

Among participants (mean age 63.0 [SD 8.4] years, 56% female, 73% white, 27% African-American), there were 891 incident diabetes cases. Participants with ≥4 vs 0–1 ideal CVH components with normal fasting glucose (n = 6004) had 80% lower risk (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.10, 0.37), while participants with baseline IFG (n = 1754) had 13% lower risk (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.58, 1.30) (p for interaction by baseline glucose status <0.0001). Additionally, the magnitude of the association of ideal CVH components with lower diabetes risk was stronger among white than African-American participants (p for interaction = 0.0338).

Conclusions/interpretation

A higher number of ideal CVH components was associated with a dose-dependent lower risk of diabetes for participants with normal fasting glucose but not IFG. Tailored efforts that take into account observed differences by race and glycaemic level are needed for the primordial prevention of diabetes.

Keywords

African-Americans Diabetes Ideal cardiovascular health Impaired fasting glucose Life’s simple 7 

Abbreviations

ACR

Albumin-to-creatinine ratio

AHA

American Heart Association

CVD

Cardiovascular disease

CVH

Cardiovascular health

CKD-EPI

Chronic Kidney Diseases Epidemiology Collaboration

eGFR

Estimated GFR

FFQ

Food frequency questionnaire

hsCRP

high-sensitivity C-reactive protein

IFG

Impaired fasting glucose

IQR

Interquartile range

PAR

Population-attributable risk

REGARDS

REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke

RR

Risk ratio

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the other investigators, the staff and the participants of the REGARDS study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating REGARDS investigators and institutions can be found at www.regardsstudy.org.

Parts of this study were presented as an oral presentation at the AHA EPI/LIFESTYLE 2018 Scientific Sessions, New Orleans, LA, USA 20–23 March 2018.

Contribution statement

JJJ researched data, performed data interpretation and wrote the manuscript. AB performed data analysis and contributed to data interpretation, methods and revision of the manuscript. JBET, VSE, JBO, BH, AD, MMS, DMC, MC and APC contributed to methods, data interpretation and reviewed/edited the manuscript. JJJ is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published.

Funding

This research project is supported by a cooperative agreement U01 NS041588 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health and the Department of Health and Human Service. Additional support was provided by U01DP006302 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and K23DK117041 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Health and Human Services.

Duality of interest

JJJ and MC are members of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association 2020 Goal Metrics Committee. APC and MMS report receiving research support from Amgen that is unrelated to the current work. All other authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with their contribution to this manuscript.

Supplementary material

125_2018_4792_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (198 kb)
ESM (PDF 179 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D et al (2010) Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association’s strategic impact goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation 121(4):586–613.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192703 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Folsom AR, Yatsuya H, Nettleton JA et al (2011) Community prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health, by the American Heart Association definition, and relationship with cardiovascular disease incidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 57(16):1690–1696.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.041 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ford ES, Greenlund KJ, Hong Y (2012) Ideal cardiovascular health and mortality from all causes and diseases of the circulatory system among adults in the United States. Circulation 125(8):987–995.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.049122 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joseph JJ, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Carnethon MR et al (2016) The association of ideal cardiovascular health with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Diabetologia 59(9):1893–1903.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-4003-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Effoe VS, Carnethon MR, Echouffo Tcheugui JB et al (2017) The American Heart Association ideal cardiovascular health and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus among blacks: the Jackson Heart Study. J Am Heart Assoc 6(6):e005008.  https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joseph JJ, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Talegawkar SA et al (2017) Modifiable lifestyle risk factors and incident diabetes in African Americans. Am J Prev Med 53(5):e165–e174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.018 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Howard VJ, Cushman M, Pulley L et al (2005) The reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study: objectives and design. Neuroepidemiology 25(3):135–143.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000086678 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cushman M, Cantrell RA, McClure LA et al (2008) Estimated 10-year stroke risk by region and race in the United States. Ann Neurol 64(5):507–513.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21493 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Block G, Woods M, Potosky A, Clifford C (1990) Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records. J Clin Epidemiol 43(12):1327–1335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90099-B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Judd SE, Letter AJ, Shikany JM et al (2015) Dietary patterns derived using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis are stable and generalizable across race, region, and gender subgroups in the REGARDS Study. Front Nutr 1:29.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2014.00029
  11. 11.
    Kulshreshtha A, Vaccarino V, Judd SE et al (2013) Life’s simple 7 and risk of incident stroke the reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study. Stroke 44(7):1909–1914.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000352 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gillett SR, Boyle RH, Zakai NA et al (2014) Validating laboratory results in a national observational cohort study without field centers: the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke cohort. Clin Biochem 47(16-17):243–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.08.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peralta CA (2011) Detection of chronic kidney disease with creatinine, cystatin C, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio and association with progression to end-stage renal disease and mortality. JAMA 305(15):1545–1552.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.468 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mozaffarian D, Kamineni A, Carnethon M et al (2009) Lifestyle risk factors and new-onset diabetes mellitus in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. Arch Intern Med 169(8):798–807.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.21 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reis JP, Loria CM, Sorlie PD, Park Y, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A (2011) Lifestyle factors and risk for new-onset diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med 155(5):292–299.  https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-5-201109060-00006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fretts AM, Howard BV, McKnight B et al (2014) Life’s simple 7 and incidence of diabetes among American Indians: the Strong Heart Family Study. Diabetes Care 37(8):2240–2245.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2267 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tuomilehto J, Schwarz PEH (2016) Preventing diabetes: early versus late preventive interventions: table 1. Diabetes Care 39(Suppl 2):S115–S120.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dcS15-3000
  18. 18.
    The Diabetes Prevention Program (2002) Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346(6):393–403.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saito T, Watanabe M, Nishida J et al (2011) Lifestyle modification and prevention of type 2 diabetes in overweight Japanese with impaired fasting glucose levels: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 171(15):1352–1360.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.275 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    le Roux CW, Astrup A, Fujioka K et al (2017) 3 years of liraglutide versus placebo for type 2 diabetes risk reduction and weight management in individuals with prediabetes: a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 389(10077):1399–1409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30069-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shay CM, Ning H, Allen NB et al (2012) Status of cardiovascular health in US adults prevalence estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2003–2008. Circulation 125(1):45–56.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.035733 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mujahid MS, Moore LV, Petito LC et al (2017) Neighborhoods and racial/ethnic differences in ideal cardiovascular health (the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). Health Place 44:61–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.01.005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saad MF, Lillioja S, Nyomba BL et al (1991) Racial differences in the relation between blood pressure and insulin resistance. N Engl J Med 324(11):733–739.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199103143241105 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wei GS, Coady SA, Goff DC et al (2011) Blood pressure and the risk of developing diabetes in African Americans and whites: ARIC, CARDIA, and the Framingham Heart Study. Diabetes Care 34(4):873–879.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1786
  25. 25.
    Zhang T, Zhang H, Li S et al (2016) Impact of adiposity on incident hypertension is modified by insulin resistance in AdultsNovelty and significance: longitudinal observation from the Bogalusa Heart Study. Hypertension 67(1):56–62.  https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06509 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Joseph JJ, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Kalyani RR et al (2016) Aldosterone, renin, and diabetes mellitus in African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101(4):1770–1778.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-1002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tu W, Eckert GJ, Hannon TS et al (2014) Racial differences in sensitivity of blood pressure to aldosterone. Hypertension 63(6):1212–1218.  https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02989 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Geiss LS, Wang J, Cheng YJ et al (2014) Prevalence and incidence trends for diagnosed diabetes among adults aged 20 to 79 years, United States, 1980-2012. JAMA 312(12):1218.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.11494 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McDonnell MN, Hillier SL, Hooker SP et al (2013) Physical activity frequency and risk of incident stroke in a national US study of blacks and whites. Stroke 44(9):2519–2524.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001538 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua J. Joseph
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aleena Bennett
    • 2
  • Justin B. Echouffo Tcheugui
    • 3
  • Valery S. Effoe
    • 4
  • James B. Odei
    • 5
  • Bertha Hidalgo
    • 6
  • Akilah Dulin
    • 7
  • Monika M. Safford
    • 8
  • Doyle M. Cummings
    • 9
  • Mary Cushman
    • 10
  • April P. Carson
    • 6
  1. 1.Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and MetabolismThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public HealthBirminghamUSA
  3. 3.Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of MedicineMorehouse School of MedicineAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Division of BiostatisticsThe Ohio State University College of Public HealthColumbusUSA
  6. 6.Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public HealthBirminghamUSA
  7. 7.Department of Behavioral and Social SciencesBrown University School of Public HealthProvidenceUSA
  8. 8.Division of General Internal MedicineNew York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  9. 9.Department of Public Health and Family MedicineEast Carolina University Brody School of MedicineGreenvilleUSA
  10. 10.Department of MedicineUniversity of Vermont College of MedicineBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations