Advertisement

Diabetologia

, Volume 61, Issue 6, pp 1273–1276 | Cite as

Defining outcomes for beta cell replacement therapy: a work in progress

  • Lorenzo Piemonti
  • Eelco J. P. de Koning
  • Thierry Berney
  • Jon S. Odorico
  • James F. Markmann
  • Peter G. Stock
  • Michael R. Rickels
Commentary

Abstract

Defined outcomes for beta cell replacement therapy in the treatment of diabetes are critically needed. Progress towards the clinical acceptance of pancreas and islet transplantation has been hampered by the lack of clear definitions of functional and efficacy outcomes, as well as a lack of consistently applied glycaemic control metrics, together with poor alignment with the field of artificial insulin delivery/artificial pancreas development. To address this problem, the International Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association (IPITA) collaborated with the European Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association (EPITA) to develop a consensus for a joint statement on the definition of function and failure of beta cell replacement therapies, which is summarised in this commentary.

Keywords

Islet transplantation Outcomes Pancreas transplantation 

Abbreviations

CGM

Continuous glucose monitoring

EPITA

European Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association

IPITA

International Pancreas & Islet Transplant Association

SMBG

Self-monitoring of blood glucose

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank S. Livingston of The Transplantation Society and C. Parisotto and G. Rossi of the European Society for Organ Transplantation for their assistance with organisation of the workshop.

Contribution statement

All authors were responsible for drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the version to be published.

Funding

LP is supported in part by a grant from the European Commission (H2020 681070). MRR is supported in part by U.S. Public Health Services research grants R01 DK091331 and R01 DK97830.

Duality of interest

The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Bartlett ST, Markmann JF, Johnson P et al (2016) Report from IPITA-TTS opinion leaders meeting on the future of beta-cell replacement. Transplantation 100(Suppl 2):S1–44CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harlan DM (2016) Islet transplantation for hypoglycemia unawareness/severe hypoglycemia: caveat emptor. Diabetes Care 39:1072–1074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rickels MR, Stock PG, de Koning EJP et al (2018) Defining outcomes for β-cell replacement therapy in the treatment of diabetes: a consensus report on the Igls criteria from the IPITA/EPITA opinion leaders workshop. Transpl Int  https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13138
  4. 4.
    Rickels MR, Stock PG, de Koning EJP, et al. (2018) Defining outcomes for β-cell replacement therapy in the treatment of diabetes: a consensus report on the Igls criteria from the IPITA/EPITA Opinion Leaders Workshop. Transplantation: in pressGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choudhary P, Rickels MR, Senior PA et al (2015) Evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations for treatment of type 1 diabetes complicated by problematic hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 38:1016–1029CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gold AE, MacLeod KM, Frier BM (1994) Frequency of severe hypoglycemia in patients with type I diabetes with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 17:697–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarke WL, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Julian D, Schlundt D, Polonsky W (1995) Reduced awareness of hypoglycemia in adults with IDDM. A prospective study of hypoglycemic frequency and associated symptoms. Diabetes Care 18:517–522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    International Hypoglycaemia Study Group (2017) Glucose concentrations of less than 3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) should be reported in clinical trials: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 60: 3–6Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Senior PA, Bellin MD, Alejandro R et al (2015) Consistency of quantitative scores of hypoglycemia severity and glycemic lability and comparison with continuous glucose monitoring system measures in long-standing type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 17:235–242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luzi L, Perseghin G, Brendel MD et al (2001) Metabolic effects of restoring partial beta-cell function after islet allotransplantation in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes 50:277–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gillard P, Hilbrands R, Van de Velde U et al (2013) Minimal functional beta-cell mass in intraportal implants that reduces glycemic variability in type 1 diabetic recipients. Diabetes Care 36:3483–3488CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang L, Lovejoy NF, Faustman DL (2012) Persistence of prolonged C-peptide production in type 1 diabetes as measured with an ultrasensitive C-peptide assay. Diabetes Care 35:465–470CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shapiro AM, Ricordi C, Hering BJ et al (2006) International trial of the Edmonton protocol for islet transplantation. N Engl J Med 355:1318–1330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fiorina P, Folli F, Zerbini G et al (2003) Islet transplantation is associated with improvement of renal function among uremic patients with type I diabetes mellitus and kidney transplants. J Am Soc Nephrol 14:2150–2158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Danne T, Nimri R, Battelino T et al (2017) International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care 40:1631–1640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agiostratidou G, Anhalt H, Ball D et al (2017) Standardizing clinically meaningful outcome measures beyond HbA1c for type 1 diabetes: a consensus report of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, the American Diabetes Association, the Endocrine Society, JDRF International, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the T1D Exchange. Diabetes Care 40:1622–1630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maahs DM, Buckingham BA, Castle JR et al (2016) Outcome measures for artificial pancreas clinical trials: a consensus report. Diabetes Care 39:1175–1179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Desai T, Shea LD (2017) Advances in islet encapsulation technologies. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16:338–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sordi V, Pellegrini S, Krampera M et al (2017) Stem cells to restore insulin production and cure diabetes. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 27:583–600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cowan PJ, Tector AJ (2017) The resurgence of xenotransplantation. Am J Transplant 17:2531–2536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pellegrini S, Cantarelli E, Sordi V, Nano R, Piemonti L (2016) The state of the art of islet transplantation and cell therapy in type 1 diabetes. Acta Diabetol 53:683–691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Skyler JS (2018) Hope vs hype: where are we in type 1 diabetes? Diabetologia 61:509–516Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Palmer JP, Fleming GA, Greenbaum CJ et al (2004) C-peptide is the appropriate outcome measure for type 1 diabetes clinical trials to preserve beta-cell function: report of an ADA workshop, 21-22 October 2001. Diabetes 53:250–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Besser RE, Jones AG, McDonald TJ, Shields BM, Knight BA, Hattersley AT (2012) The impact of insulin administration during the mixed meal tolerance test. Diabet Med 29:1279–1284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Steffes MW, Sibley S, Jackson M, Thomas W (2003) Beta-cell function and the development of diabetes-related complications in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care 26:832–836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    (1998) Effect of intensive therapy on residual beta-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes in the diabetes control and complications trial. A randomized, controlled trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Ann Intern Med 128: 517–523Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lachin JM, McGee P, Palmer JP (2014) Impact of C-peptide preservation on metabolic and clinical outcomes in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes 63:739–748CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Piemonti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eelco J. P. de Koning
    • 3
  • Thierry Berney
    • 4
  • Jon S. Odorico
    • 5
  • James F. Markmann
    • 6
  • Peter G. Stock
    • 7
  • Michael R. Rickels
    • 8
  1. 1.Diabetes Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
  2. 2.Vita-Salute San Raffaele UniversityMilanItaly
  3. 3.Department of MedicineLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenthe Netherlands
  4. 4.Division of Transplantation and Visceral Surgery, Department of SurgeryGeneva University HospitalGenevaSwitzerland
  5. 5.Division of Transplantation, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  6. 6.Division of Transplantation, Department of SurgeryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  7. 7.Division of Transplantation, Department of SurgeryUniversity of California at San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  8. 8.Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations