Aortic stiffness and ambulatory blood pressure as predictors of diabetic kidney disease: a competing risks analysis from the Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a microvascular complication associated with poor control of blood glucose and BP. We aimed to evaluate the predictors of development and progression of DKD in a cohort of high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes, placing emphasis on ambulatory BP and arterial stiffness.
In a prospective study, 629 individuals without advanced renal failure had their renal function evaluated annually over a median follow-up period of 7.8 years. Ambulatory BP was monitored and aortic stiffness was assessed by carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity at baseline. Multivariate competing risks analysis with all-cause mortality, using the Fine and Gray approach, was used to examine the independent predictors of development and progression of DKD, a composite of development or progression of abnormal albuminuria and worsening of renal function (doubling of serum creatinine or progression to end-stage renal disease).
At baseline, 197 individuals had DKD. During follow-up, DKD developed or progressed in 195 individuals, abnormal albuminuria developed or progressed in 125 individuals and renal function deteriorated in 91. After adjustments for baseline albuminuria and renal function, age, sex, diabetes duration and use of renin–angiotensin antagonists, poorer control of blood glucose (HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.98, 1.40; p = 0.09 for each 1 SD increment in mean first-year HbA1c), higher ambulatory systolic BP (HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.09, 1.50; p = 0.003, for each 1 SD increase in daytime systolic BP [SBP]) and increased aortic stiffness (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.00, 1.34; p = 0.05) were independent predictors of development or progression of DKD. At baseline, ambulatory BP was a stronger predictor than BP measured in the clinic. Aortic stiffness predicted abnormal albuminuria development or progression (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.02, 1.56; p = 0.036) whereas ambulatory BP was a stronger predictor of renal function deterioration (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.09, 1.60; p = 0.005 for daytime SBP).
Poor blood glucose and BP control and increased aortic stiffness were the main predictors of development or progression of DKD; ambulatory SBP was a better predictor than BP measured in the clinic. Ambulatory BP monitoring and assessment of aortic stiffness should be more widely used in clinical type 2 diabetes management.
KeywordsAlbuminuria Ambulatory blood pressures Aortic stiffness Diabetic kidney disease Type 2 diabetes
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor
Angiotensin II receptor blocker
Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity
Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration
Diabetic kidney disease
End-stage renal disease
The Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study is an ongoing study, and its dataset is not publicly available to ensure that the privacy of individual participants is maintained. However, data may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
This study was supported by grants from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) and from the Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, Brazil). The sponsors had no role in study design, collection and analysis of data, interpretation of results or preparation, review and approval of the manuscript.
Duality of interest
The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.
CRLC, NCL and GFS conceived and designed the study, followed-up the participants and obtained the data. MTF performed all aortic stiffness measurements. GCS performed the competing risks analyses. CRLC drafted the manuscript. GFS analysed the data and is the guarantor. All authors helped interpret the results, contributed with intellectual content, reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version to be published. GFS had full access to all the data and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of data analysis.
- 5.Coca SG, Ismail-Beigi F, Haq N, Krumholz HM, Parikh CR (2012) Role of intensive glucose control in development of renal end points in type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. Arch Intern Med 172:761–769CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.Boussageon R, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Saadatian-Elahi M et al (2011) Effect of intensive glucose lowering treatment on all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343:d4169CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.Zoungas S, de Galan BE, Ninomiya T et al (2009) Combined effects of routine blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: new results from the ADVANCE. Diabetes Care 32:2068–2074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 37.Sweeting MJ, Barrett JK, Thompson SG, Wood AM (2016) The use of repeated blood pressure measures for cardiovascular risk prediction: a comparison of statistical models in the ARIC study. Stat Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7144