Diabetologia

, Volume 60, Issue 7, pp 1344–1353 | Cite as

Women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus and prediabetes are characterised by a decreased incretin effect

  • Signe Foghsgaard
  • Louise Vedtofte
  • Camilla Andreasen
  • Emilie S. Andersen
  • Emilie Bahne
  • Jonatan I. Bagger
  • Jens A. Svare
  • Jens J. Holst
  • Tine D. Clausen
  • Elisabeth R. Mathiesen
  • Peter Damm
  • Filip K. Knop
  • Tina Vilsbøll
Article

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

We investigated whether a reduced incretin effect, as observed in patients with type 2 diabetes, can be detected in high-risk individuals, such as women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (pGDM).

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 102 women without diabetes with pGDM and 15 control participants without pGDM and with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) underwent a 4 h 75 g OGTT and an isoglycaemic i.v. glucose infusion (IIGI). Women with pGDM were classified as having NGT or prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance). Insulin sensitivity was assessed using the Matsuda index and HOMA2-IR and the incretin effect was calculated from insulin responses during the study (100% × [AUCinsulin,OGTT − AUCinsulin,IIGI]/AUCinsulin,OGTT).

Results

Sixty-three of the 102 women with pGDM (62%) had prediabetes (median [interquartile range]: age, 38.3 [6.5] years; BMI, 32.1 [5.8] kg/m2) and 39 women (38%) had NGT (age, 39.5 [5.6] years; BMI, 31.0 [6.7] kg/m2). Control participants (n = 15) were not significantly different from the pGDM group with regards to age (39.2 [7.4] years) and BMI (28.8 [9.2] kg/m2). Compared with women with NGT and control participants, women with prediabetes had lower insulin sensitivity, as measured by the Matsuda index (3.0 [2.4] vs 5.0 [2.6] vs 1.5 [1.8], respectively; p < 0.001). The incretin effect was 55.3% [27.8], 73.8% [19.0] and 76.7% [24.6] in women with prediabetes, women with normal glucose tolerance and control participants, respectively (p < 0.01).

Conclusion/interpretation

Prediabetes was highly prevalent in women with pGDM, and alterations in the incretin effect were detected in this group before the development of type 2 diabetes.

Trial registration:

clinicaltrialsregister.eu 2012-001371-37-DK.

Keywords

Gestational diabetes mellitus Impaired glucose tolerance Incretin effect Isoglycaemic i.v. glucose infusion Oral glucose tolerance test Prediabetes Type 2 diabetes 

Abbreviations

FPG

Fasting plasma glucose

GCP

Good clinical practice

GDM

Gestational diabetes mellitus

GIGD

Gastrointestinal-mediated glucose disposal

GIP

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide

GLP-1

Glucagon-like peptide-1

iAUC

Incremental AUC

IFG

Impaired fasting glucose

IGT

Impaired glucose tolerance

IIGI

Isoglycaemic i.v. glucose infusion

IQR

Interquartile range

ISR

Insulin secretory rate

NGT

Normal glucose tolerance

pGDM

Prior gestational diabetes mellitus

tAUC

Total AUC

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the participating women and for laboratory assistance from: N. Kjeldsen, J. Purtoft, S. M. Schmidt and I. A. Nachar at Center for Diabetes Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark; L. Thielsen and L. Albæk from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF) Center for Basic Metabolic Research and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; and Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark for the supply of valine-pyrrolidide. Part of this work has been presented as an abstract at the Scientific Sessions of the ADA in San Francisco, June 2014, and Boston, June 2015, and at the Annual Meeting of the EASD in Vienna, September 2014, and Stockholm, September 2015.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

The study was initiated by the authors and supported as an investigator-initiated study by unrestricted grants from Novo Nordisk, the Novo Nordisk Foundation and the Danish Diabetes Academy. Research support was received from the AP Moeller Foundation and Danielsen Foundation. The study sponsor (Novo Nordisk) was involved in the design of the study; but not the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; neither writing the report; nor the decision to submit the report for publication.

Duality of interest

SF, LV, CA, ESA, EB, JIB, TDC, JAS, ERM declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript. JJH is on the advisory panel of, consultant for, in the speaker bureau of and/or has received research support from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Hamni, Intarcia, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Zealand Pharma. PD is on the speaker bureau for Novo Nordisk and is participating in a multinational study with Novo Nordisk. FKK is on the advisory panel of, consultant for, in the speaker bureau of and/or has received research support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Fractyl, Gubra, Novo Nordisk, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi and Zealand Pharma. TV is on the advisory panel for, consultant for, in the speaker bureau of and/or has received research support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Takeda.

Contribution statement

All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content as well as approved the final version. SF and LV made contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data, and are responsible for the integrity of the data. CA, ESA and EB contributed to acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data. JJH contributed to analysis and interpretation of data. JAS, TDC, ERM and PD were responsible for recruitment of patients and contributed to interpretation of data. JIB contributed to interpretation of data. FKK contributed to the design of the study and interpretation of data. TV is the guarantor of this work and made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, obtained funding and is responsible for the integrity of the data.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization, International Diabetes Federation (2006) Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycemia: report of a WHO/IDF consultation. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lauenborg J, Hansen T, Jensen DM et al (2004) Increasing incidence of diabetes after gestational diabetes: a long-term follow-up in a Danish population. Diabetes Care 27:1194–1199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kitzmiller JL, Dang-Kilduff L, Taslimi MM (2007) Gestational diabetes after delivery. Short-term management and long-term risks. Diabetes Care 30(Suppl 2):S225–S235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benhalima K, Mathieu C, Damm P et al (2015) A proposal for the use of uniform diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Europe: an opinion paper by the European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG). Diabetologia 58:1422–1429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH (2002) Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 25:1862–1868CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fernández-Castañer M, Biarnés J, Camps I, Ripollés J, Gómez N, Soler J (1996) Beta-cell dysfunction in first-degree relatives of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med J 13:953–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kahn SE, Cooper ME, Del Prato S (2014) Pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Lancet 383:1068–1083CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nauck M, Stöckmann F, Ebert R, Creutzfeldt W (1986) Reduced incretin effect in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. Diabetologia 29:46–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vilsbøll T, Krarup T, Madsbad S, Holst JJ (2002) Defective amplification of the late phase insulin response to glucose by GIP in obese type II diabetic patients. Diabetologia 45:1111–1119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kosinski M, Knop FK, Vedtofte L et al (2013) Postpartum reversibility of impaired incretin effect in gestational diabetes mellitus. Regul Pept 186:104–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foghsgaard S, Vedtofte L, Mathiesen ER et al (2013) The effect of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist on glucose tolerance in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus: protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, parallel intervention trial. BMJ Open 3:e003834. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003834 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wewer Albrechtsen NJ, Hartmann B, Veedfald S et al (2014) Hyperglucagonaemia analysed by glucagon sandwich ELISA: non-specific interference or truly elevated levels? Diabetologia 57:1919–1926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lindgren O, Carr RD, Deacon CF et al (2011) Incretin hormone and insulin responses to oral versus intravenous lipid administration in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:2519–2524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Orskov C, Wettergren A, Holst JJ (1993) Biological effects and metabolic rates of glucagonlike peptide-1 7-36 amide and glucagonlike peptide-1 7-37 in healthy subjects are indistinguishable. Diabetes 42:658–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC (1985) Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28:412–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levy JC, Matthews DR, Hermans MP (1998) Correct homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) evaluation uses the computer program. Diabetes Care 21:2191–2192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA (1999) Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care 22:1462–1470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Turner RC, Holman RR, Matthews D, Hockaday TD, Peto J (1979) Insulin deficiency and insulin resistance interaction in diabetes: estimation of their relative contribution by feedback analysis from basal plasma insulin and glucose concentrations. Metabolism 28:1086–1096CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hare KJ, Vilsbøll T, Holst JJ, Knop FK (2010) Inappropriate glucagon response after oral compared with isoglycemic intravenous glucose administration in patients with type 1 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 298:E832–E837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Orskov C, Rabenhøj L, Wettergren A, Kofod H, Holst JJ (1994) Tissue and plasma concentrations of amidated and glycine-extended glucagon-like peptide I in humans. Diabetes 43:535–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Michaliszyn SF, Mari A, Lee S et al (2014) β-Cell function, incretin effect, and incretin hormones in obese youth along the span of glucose tolerance from normal to prediabetes to type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 63:3846–3855CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Knop FK, Aaboe K, Vilsbøll T et al (2012) Impaired incretin effect and fasting hyperglucagonaemia characterizing type 2 diabetic subjects are early signs of dysmetabolism in obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab 14:500–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holst JJ, Knop FK, Vilsbøll T, Krarup T, Madsbad S (2011) Loss of incretin effect is a specific, important, and early characteristic of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 34(Suppl 2):S251–S257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bagger JI, Knop FK, Lund A, Holst JJ, Vilsbøll T (2014) Glucagon responses to increasing oral loads of glucose and corresponding isoglycaemic intravenous glucose infusions in patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy individuals. Diabetologia 57:1720–1725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Færch K, Torekov SS, Vistisen D et al (2015) GLP-1 response to oral glucose is reduced in prediabetes, screen-detected type 2 diabetes, and obesity and influenced by sex: the ADDITION-PRO study. Diabetes 64:2513–2525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mitrakou A, Kelley D, Mokan M et al (1992) Role of reduced suppression of glucose production and diminished early insulin release in impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 326:22–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Laakso M, Zilinskaite J, Hansen T et al (2008) Insulin sensitivity, insulin release and glucagon-like peptide-1 levels in persons with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance in the EUGENE2 study. Diabetologia 51:502–511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Forbes S, Godsland IF, Taylor-Robinson SD et al (2013) A history of previous gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with adverse changes in insulin secretion and VLDL metabolism independently of increased intrahepatocellular lipid. Diabetologia 56:2021–2033CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meier JJ, Gallwitz B, Askenas M et al (2005) Secretion of incretin hormones and the insulinotropic effect of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in women with a history of gestational diabetes. Diabetologia 48:1872–1881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Calanna S, Christensen M, Holst JJ et al (2013) Secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analyses of clinical studies. Diabetologia 56:965–972CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    American Diabetes Association (2016) II. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 39(Suppl 2):S137–S145Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Metzger BE, Coustan DR (1998) Summary and recommendations of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. The Organizing Committee. Diabetes Care 21(Suppl 2):B161–B167PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Signe Foghsgaard
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Louise Vedtofte
    • 1
  • Camilla Andreasen
    • 1
  • Emilie S. Andersen
    • 1
  • Emilie Bahne
    • 1
  • Jonatan I. Bagger
    • 1
  • Jens A. Svare
    • 4
  • Jens J. Holst
    • 2
  • Tine D. Clausen
    • 5
  • Elisabeth R. Mathiesen
    • 6
  • Peter Damm
    • 7
  • Filip K. Knop
    • 1
    • 2
    • 8
  • Tina Vilsbøll
    • 1
    • 8
  1. 1.Center for Diabetes ResearchGentofte Hospital, University of CopenhagenHellerupDenmark
  2. 2.NNF Center for Basic Metabolic Research and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Danish Diabetes AcademyOdense University HospitalOdenseDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsHerlev HospitalHerlevDenmark
  5. 5.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsNordsjællands HospitalHillerødDenmark
  6. 6.Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Department of EndocrinologyRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
  7. 7.Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Department of ObstetricsRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
  8. 8.Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations