Expression and purification of recombinant human apoA-I
Human apoA-I containing a His-tag at the N-terminus was expressed in bacteria and purified using immobilised metal affinity chromatography [8] followed by tobacco etch virus protease treatment to remove the His-tag. Protein purity was analysed by SDS-PAGE, and concentration was determined by using a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Protein function was assayed using a lipid-clearance assay and by qualitative analysis of HDL formation as previously described [8].
Animals and diets
Male C57BL/6 mice (Taconic, Ry, Denmark) were used at 9-12 weeks of age. Animals were on a 12 h light cycle with non-restricted food and water. The HFD animals were fed an HFD (D12492, 60% fat content; Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) for 2 weeks. All animal procedures were approved by the Malmö/Lund Committee for Animal Experiment Ethics, Lund, Sweden.
Glucose tolerance test
Mice fasted overnight (12 h) were injected i.p. with apoA-I WT or apoA-I Milano (14 mg/kg in PBS, pH 7.4; control animals received NaCl) and this was followed by collection of serum samples at the indicated times. In separate experiments, glucose (50 mg/mouse) was injected i.p. 3 h after treatments, followed by collection of serum samples at the indicated times. Blood glucose levels were measured (OnetouchUltra2; Lifescan, Milpitas, CA, USA), and insulin levels were assayed in serum using ELISA (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden).
Immunoblotting
Serum samples from animals 3 h after apoA-I injection were separated by native-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, probed with antibodies to human apoA-I (Abcam No. 64308, Cambridge, UK) and detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) secondary antibodies. Blots were imaged using the Odyssey Fc system (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) and analysed using Image studio v2.0 software.
Statistical analysis
All data are displayed as mean ± SEM. Analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s post hoc test or, where indicated, by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test or non-parametric Mann–Whitney test using GraphPad Prism software. p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.