Skip to main content

Table 3 Dietary-pattern scores by country in the subcohort of the EPIC-InterAct study

From: Adherence to predefined dietary patterns and incident type 2 diabetes in European populations: EPIC-InterAct Study

Country n aHEI DASH RRR1 ([20]) RRR2 ([18]) RRR3 ([19])
France 532 0.20 (−0.45, 0.72) 0.38 (−0.15, 0.97) −0.05 (−0.49, 0.47) 0.13 (−0.29, 0.66) 0.51 (−0.02, 1.12)
Spain 3,508 0.20 (−0.45, 0.98) 0.44 (−0.02, 0.97) −0.57 (−1.01, −0.16) −0.28 (−1.05, 0.34) −0.52 (−0.95, −0.14)
UKa
 Norfolk 844 0.07 (−0.58, 0.98) 0.89 (0.32, 1.53) 0.26 (−0.22, 0.70) 0.19 (−0.48, 0.71)
 Oxford 239 0.98 (0.07, 1.76) 0.83 (0.31, 1.39) 0.79 (0.31, 1.22) 0.49 (−0.15, 0.98)
Netherlands 1,396 −0.19 (−0.71, 0.33) 0.18 (−0.61, 0.84) 0.29 (−0.19, 0.67) 0.51 (0.004, 0.89) 0.14 (−0.32, 0.54)
Germany 2,041 −0.45 (−0.97, 0.07) −0.28 (−0.87, 0.38) 0.004 (−0.43, 0.36) 0.41 (−0.21, 0.79) 0.13 (−0.27, 0.55)
Sweden 1,917 −0.32 (−0.97, 0.20) −0.55 (−1.33, 0.18) 0.05 (−0.41, 0.52) 0.39 (−0.12, 0.77) 0.07 (−0.41, 0.57)
Denmark 2,118 −0.06 (−0.71, 0.59) −0.15 (−0.87, 0.51) 0.53 (−0.03, 1.03) 0.05 (−0.58, 0.54) 0.59 (0.003, 1.25)
Total 12,595 −0.06 (−0.71, 0.59) 0.05 (−0.68, 0.70) 0.01 (−0.56, 0.57) 0.18 (−0.48, 0.68) 0.01 (−0.54, 0.57)
  1. Data are medians (interquartile ranges)
  2. aUK centres were split up due to differences in the recruitment scheme (high proportion of vegans, vegetarian and other health-conscious people in Oxford cohort, see Methods section for more details)