Participant characteristics
Participants in the study groups were well matched for age, sex, body composition, blood pressure, and glucose and lipid variables (Table 1). The number of participants using statins was not different among groups (Healthy Diet n = 9, WGED n = 10, control n = 9; p = 0.92) and none of the participants stopped or started this medication during the study.
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the participants according to study group
Diet and body composition during the study
Although at baseline the Healthy Diet group had a trend towards higher energy intake than the WGED group (p = 0.06), the change in daily energy intake was similar among the groups, even after taking the baseline energy intake into account (p = 0.18). In the within-group analyses, the reported energy intake increased in all the groups during the study as compared with baseline ([mean ± SD] Healthy Diet 8,185 ± 1,860 vs 8,980 ± 1,995 kJ/day, p = 0.003; WGED 6,995 ± 2,373 vs 7,655 ± 2,395 kJ/day, p = 0.03; control group 7,244 ± 2,028 vs 8,522 ± 1,718 kJ/day, p = 0.05).
There was a trend towards a decrease in body weight in the Healthy Diet group and towards an increase in body weight in the control group (mean ± SD: 89.8 ± 12.2 vs 89.0 ± 11.7 kg/m2, p = 0.08 and 89.5 ± 13.2 vs 89.9 ± 13.1 kg/m2, p = 0.08, respectively). These developments were also reflected in terms of BMI (mean ± SD: 31.1 ± 3.6 vs 31.0 ± 3.4 kg/m2, p = 0.08 and 30.9 ± 3.5 vs 31.0 ± 3.6 kg/m2, p = 0.05, respectively). Although the reported energy intake in the WGED group increased during the study compared with baseline, body weight and BMI did not change (89.2 ± 15.3 vs 89.1 ± 15.3 and 31.4 ± 3.4 vs 31.4 ± 3.4 kg/m2, respectively, p > 0.10 for both). However, the changes in BMI and body weight between baseline and the end of the study were not significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05 for all).
During the study, participants recorded a mean intake of test breads of 7.7, 7.9 and 6.8 portions per day in the Healthy Diet, WGED and control groups, respectively. In the WGED, the mean daily intake of the wholegrain oat snack bar was 13 g. In the Healthy Diet group, participants consumed a mean of 3.2 fish meals (>85% as fatty fish) per week; their intake of bilberries was 3.2 portions per day. The main source of fat used for preparing the fish meals was rapeseed oil. The change in dietary nutrient intake based on the 4 day food records is depicted in Table 2. While the change in carbohydrate consumption was similar among groups (p = 0.55), fibre intake increased in the Healthy Diet and WGED groups compared with the control group (p < 0.001), being even higher in the former than in the WGED group (p < 0.001).
Table 2 Nutrient intake and n-3 fatty acids in plasma lipids at baseline and during the study according to the study interventions and their respective relative changes
While the changes in intake of total and saturated fat were not different among groups (p > 0.05), the intake of polyunsaturated fat decreased in the WGED and control groups (p = 0.001 for both). In the Healthy Diet and WGED groups, the saturated fat intake slightly decreased during the intervention (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02, respectively). However, the magnitude of these changes was very small (Table 2). In the control group, the intake of total and saturated fat did not change (p = 0.58 and p = 0.71, respectively). In the Healthy Diet group, participants reported an increase in their intake of ALA and EPA+DHA during the study as compared with baseline (p < 0.001), thus differing from the control group (p < 0.001). In plasma, however, although the percentage of EPA+DHA (p < 0.001) and ALA (p < 0.001) increased in the Healthy Diet group, only the former was significantly different from the control (p < 0.001) and WGED (p < 0.001) groups (Table 2).
Glucose and insulin metabolism during the study
As previously found [21], although there were no statistical differences in the changes of glucose and insulin metabolism between the groups (p > 0.10 for all), the 2 h plasma glucose value decreased in the Healthy Diet (mean ± SD: 6.7 ± 1.7 vs 6.1 ± 1.7 mmol/l, p = 0.002) and WGED (6.6 ± 1.6 vs 6.1 ± 1.9 mmol/l, p = 0.009) groups; and the glucose AUC also decreased in the Healthy Diet group (mean ± SD: 244 ± 132 vs 194 ± 121 mmol/l, p = 0.007). Also in the latter we observed improvements in early-phase insulin secretion, estimated as insulinogenic index, and in the composite measure of beta cell function, estimated as the disposition index (Table 3). No change in insulin sensitivity between and within groups was observed when estimated either by fasting insulin, HOMA of insulin resistance [21], quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) or by the Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (Table 3).
Table 3 Indexes of insulin and glucose metabolism, and circulating levels of biomarkers related to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction before and after Healthy Diet (n = 36), WGED (n = 34) and control (n = 34) dietary interventions and their respective relative changes
Changes in plasma inflammatory markers during the study
The results of all 11 inflammation- and endothelial function-related markers are described in Table 3. Only E-selectin and hsCRP changed in different ways across the groups or after the 12 week study in within-group analyses.
Plasma concentrations of E-selectin and hsCRP did not differ among groups at baseline (p > 0.10 for both) (Table 3). Plasma E-selectin concentration in the Healthy Diet group decreased significantly during the intervention (p < 0.05), but not in the WGED or control groups (p > 0.05). The change during the Healthy Diet intervention was significantly different from that in the control group, but it was not significant when compared with the WGED after testing for multiple comparisons (p = 0.02 and p = 0.26, respectively). Circulating levels of hsCRP decreased only in the WGED group (p < 0.05), but the changes among the groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05) (Table 2).
In the Healthy Diet group, there was a higher proportion of individuals with high-risk hsCRP levels (>3.0 mg/l) at baseline in non-statin-users than in statin-users (33.3% vs 0%, p = 0.08). However, this difference was attenuated after the 12-week intervention (15% vs 0%, p = 0.55). These respective changes were also seen in the median hsCRP values before (non-statin 1.9 [IQR 0.8, 3.6] vs statin 1.1 [0.7, 1.4], p = 0.10) and after the intervention (1.1 [0.8, 2.6] vs 1.1 [0.9, 2.2], p = 0.91).
Figure 2 displays the analyses of hsCRP after excluding participants who used statins during the study. The hsCRP concentrations at baseline were not different among the groups (p = 0.91). Plasma hsCRP concentrations decreased in individuals following the WGED and Healthy Diet interventions (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively) (Fig. 2). The change in circulating levels of hsCRP in the WGED group was significantly different from that in the control group (p < 0.05). Plasma E-selectin concentrations at baseline also did not differ among groups (p = 0.55) in participants not using statins, and decreased only in the Healthy Diet group (p = 0.004). The change in E-selectin also differed between the Healthy Diet and control groups (median −9% [IQR −15, 1] vs 2% [−7, 9], p = 0.02), but not between the Healthy Diet and WGED (−2% [−7, 9], p = 0.25) groups. Adjustment for the changes in BMI, insulin sensitivity and energy intake did not alter the results. Although an increase in energy intake was associated with a decrease in hsCRP levels, a change in BMI or insulin sensitivity was not significantly associated with either of the outcomes in each respective model (data not shown).
Association between changes in dietary intake and changes in plasma E-selectin and hsCRP
Additionally, we explored whether the changes in dietary intake of fibre and in dietary intake and plasma percentages of n-3 fatty acids could explain the change in E-selectin and hsCRP concentrations in participants not using statins (Table 4). A higher increase in the intake of fibre was significantly associated with a greater decrease in plasma E-selectin during the study. Similarly, a greater increase in the intake and plasma percentage levels of the sum of EPA and DHA was associated with a decrease in plasma E-selectin. However, the effect of the increase in ALA intake on decreasing E-selectin was not reflected by ALA plasma proportions (Table 4).
Table 4 Regression coefficients (β) for the effect of the change in the intake of fibre, and of the changes in plasma and dietary ALA and EPA + DHA on the changes in plasma E-selectin or in hsCRP in participants not using statins during the study
Interestingly, belonging to the Healthy Diet group was associated with a greater decrease in E-selectin levels compared with the control group (Fig. 2), even when including the change in intake of fibre, EPA + DHA or ALA in the models (p < 0.05 for the effect of group and for the difference between Healthy Diet and control groups in all models in participants not using statins).
In similar models, but considering hsCRP as a dependent variable, we only found a trend for an association between the increase in ALA intake and the decrease in hsCRP, and this was not confirmed at plasma levels (Table 4). Finally, and still in participants not using statins, a higher intake of test breads in the Healthy Diet and WGED interventions was strongly associated with decreased hsCRP levels (slices/day β = −0.51, p < 0.001). Of the various breads, the endosperm rye bread was the one that was highly correlated with the change in hsCRP (β = −0.59, p < 0.001), followed by the other commercial rye breads (β = −0.37, p < 0.01 for all commercial rye breads).