Exposure to CVS transiently decreases lean mass and SPA
C57BL/6 male mice were exposed to CVS for 15 days, and body composition and energy balance were analysed. Subsequently, mice from the CVS group and a non-stressed control group were each distributed into two subgroups maintained on low-fat chow or a 40% high-fat diet for 1 month. Body composition and energy balance were then redetermined (Fig. 1). After 15 days’ exposure to CVS, mice had significantly lower body weight (Fig. 2a; 26.5 ± 0.3 g, n = 16, p < 0.001) and lean mass (Fig. 2c; 21.7 ± 0.3 g, n = 16, p < 0.001) compared with unstressed controls (n = 15; 27.9 ± 0.3 g and 23.1 ± 0.2 g, respectively). Fat mass (Fig. 2b) and food intake normalised per g body weight were unaltered (Fig. 2d). The respiratory quotient was significantly decreased during the first dark phase 0.77 ± 0.01 in the CVS mice (n = 15, p < 0.01) vs 0.82 ± 0.01 in the control mice (n = 15), but no differences were found at later points (Fig. 2e). There were no significant differences between the groups in energy expenditure levels (n = 15; Fig. 2f).
The 4 day total SPA levels were significantly decreased in the CVS mice (75,308 ± 2,909 events, n = 16, p < 0.001) compared with the control group (108,090 ± 4,966 events, n = 15; Fig. 3).
Plasma measurements were taken the day after the CVS period. Fasting plasma glucose levels were significantly lower in the CVS mice (7.2 ± 0.25 mmol/l, n = 15, p < 0.001) compared with the control mice (8.9 ± 0.32 mmol/l, n = 15). Plasma triacylglycerols were significantly lower in the CVS mice (0.5771 ± 0.02304 nmol/l, n = 15, p < 0.05) compared with the control mice (0.6662 ± 0.02784 nmol/l, n = 14). Plasma corticosterone was already normalised by the end of the stress exposure, as there were no significant differences between the groups at that time (control mice 455.5 ± 17.40 nmol/l, CVS mice 575.3 ± 30.67 nmol/l, n = 14–15).
Previous CVS exposure does not affect obesity onset with a high-fat diet
As expected, consumption of a 40% high-fat diet for 1 month increased body weight in the control (32.45 ± 1.27 g, p < 0.01, n = 8) and in the CVS mice (31.28 ± 1.05 g, p < 0.01, n = 8), as well as fat mass (control mice 6.16 ± 1 g, CVS mice 5.33 ± 0.74 g, p < 0.01, n = 8), compared with mice consuming low-fat chow (control mice body weight 27.37 ± 0.62 g and fat mass 1.21 ± 0.11 g, CVS mice body weight 27.26 ± 0.47 g and fat mass 1.06 ± 0.13 g, n = 7–8). However, there were no significant differences in body weight gain (Fig. 4a) or fat mass between the CVS mice (n = 8) and the control mice (n = 8) on either diet (data not shown). The percentage of lean mass gain was significantly higher in the CVS mice consuming chow (11.13 ± 1.05%, n = 8, p < 0.01) and the high-fat diet (7.86 ± 1.9%, n = 8, p < 0.05) compared with the control mice consuming chow (2.74 ± 1.12%, n = 7) and the high-fat diet (2.54 ± 1.2%, n = 8; Fig. 4b). The respiratory quotient was significantly decreased in the CVS mice (0.77 ± 0.01, n = 15, p < 0.01) compared with the control mice (0.82 ± 0.01, n = 15) consuming chow, whereas respiratory quotient was unchanged in mice on the high-fat diet (Fig. 4c). There were no differences in food intake, energy expenditure and SPA among the groups (n = 7–8; data not shown).
Chronic high-fat diet consumption impairs glucose metabolism in male mice previously exposed to CVS
CVS mice consuming the high-fat diet had significantly lower plasma adiponectin (2,308 ± 172 pg/ml, n = 8, p < 0.05) and higher resistin (5,093 ± 687 pg/ml, n = 8, p < 0.05) compared with the control mice (2,853 ± 151 pg/ml and 2,816 ± 388 pg/ml, respectively, n = 8), (Fig. 5d,e). Interestingly, these differences in adiponectin and resistin preceded a significantly lower glucose tolerance observed in mice previously exposed to CVS (n = 7, two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, p < 0.05), compared with the control mice (n = 8; Fig. 5f). These differences depended on the combination of CVS exposure and subsequent exposure to the high-fat diet. There were no differences in adiponectin (Fig. 5a), resistin (Fig. 5b) or glucose tolerance (Fig. 5c) in mice consuming chow. At this stage of the study and therefore preceding the differences in glucose tolerance, there were no significant differences between the groups in fasting plasma insulin levels with the chow (control mice 208.1 ± 14.34 pmol/l, CVS mice 224.1 ± 20.27 pmol/l, n = 7–8) or the high-fat diet (control mice 310 ± 39.01 pmol/l, CVS mice 299.9 ± 45.68 pmol/l, n = 7–8).
The analysis of relevant genes in white adipose tissue from CVS mice on the high-fat diet using low-density array (n = 4, one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test) showed significantly higher expression of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), beta (Cebpb; p < 0.01; Fig. 6a), early growth response 2 transcription factor (Egr2; p < 0.05; Fig. 6b), hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (Hif1a; p < 0.05; Fig. 6c) and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (Ccl2; p < 0.05; Fig. 6d) compared with the control/high-fat diet mice (n = 4). The expression of these genes indicates higher adipogenesis and adipocyte differentiation, hypoxia and inflammation, respectively, in accordance with the lower glucose tolerance observed in the CVS/high-fat diet mice. Mice fed chow did not differ in relation to CVS mice in the expression of the factors mentioned above (n = 4; Fig. 6a–d). Mice subjected to CVS and fed with the high-fat diet (n = 3) showed higher lipogenesis as indicated by the significantly higher expression of glycerol kinase (Gyk) compared with CVS/chow mice (n = 4, p < 0.05), but not when compared with control/high-fat diet mice (n = 4). Other specific gene targets involved in carbohydrate metabolism (Pdk2, Pdk4, Slc2a1, Slc2a4), fatty acid synthesis (Pparg, Acaca, Fasn, Mlxipl, Scd1, Scd2), fatty acid transport (Cd36, Fabp4, Fabp5, Slc27a1), lipoprotein metabolism (Abca1, Apoe, Cd68, Ldlr, Lrp1, Scarb1), lipogenesis (Srebf1), lipolysis (Lipe, Lpl), inflammation (Il10, Itgax, Tnf), protein metabolism (Agt, Ppib), cytokine signalling (Adipoq, Atg4c, Lep, Retn), cell differentiation (Dlk1, Vegfa), cell adhesion/migration (Emr1), steroid metabolism (Abcg1, Hmgcr) and regulation of proliferation (Insig1) were not expressed at different levels in the CVS and the control groups.
CVS mice consuming the high-fat diet had significantly lower plasma NEFA (0.07714 ± 0.006 mmol/l, n = 7, p < 0.05) compared with the control mice (0.09625 ± 0.005 mmol/l, n = 8; Fig. 6b) and lower plasma glycerol (739.1 ± 27.67 μmol/l, n = 7, p < 0.05) compared with the control mice (901.2 ± 59.58 μmol/l, n = 8; Fig. 6d). There were no differences in plasma NEFA (control 0.0675 ± 0.01013 mmol/l vs CVS 0.0750 ± 0.005345 mmol/l, n = 8) and glycerol (control 527.6 ± 69.86 μmol/l vs. CVS 483.7 ± 41.65 μmol/l, n = 7–8) between the groups consuming chow (Fig. 6a,c). There were no significant differences between the groups in fasting plasma insulin levels under chow (control mice 912.8 ± 200.9 pmol/l, CVS mice 637.5 ± 112.9 pmol/l, n = 6–8) or with the high-fat diet (control mice 3,077 ± 390.3 pmol/l, CVS mice 4,815 ± 1,656 pmol/l, n = 7; Fig. 6e, f). There were no differences in plasma leptin levels with the chow (control mice 3.201 ± 1.047 μg/l, CVS mice 2.730 ± 0.3694 μg/l, n = 7–8) or the high-fat diet (control mice 39.19 ± 6.552 μg/l, CVS mice 47.52 ± 10.01 μg/l, n = 6–7; Fig. 6g, h). Similarly, no significant differences were found: in plasma corticosterone levels between the groups with chow (control mice 222.8 ± 26.19 nmol/l, CVS mice 190.9 ± 51.33 nmol/l, n = 7–8) or the high-fat diet (control mice 227.4 ± 27.91 nmol/l, CVS mice 206.7 ± 22.88 nmol/l, n = 7–8); in plasma thyroid-stimulating hormone with chow (control mice 0.0009156 ± 0.0001525 mg/l, CVS mice 0.001080 ± 0.0003844 mg/l, n = 7–8) or the high-fat diet (control mice 0.0004667 ± 0.0001080 mg/l, CVS mice 0.0005617 ± 0.0001139 mg/l, n = 7–8); or in total plasma T4 levels with chow (control mice 6,837 ± 1,428 nmol/l, CVS mice 5,187 ± 468.7 nmol/l, n = 6–8) or the high-fat diet (control mice 4,537 ± 1,178 nmol/l, CVS mice 4,413 ± 644.6 nmol/l, n = 6–7). Total plasma T3 levels were below the lower limit of detection in most of the samples.
As expected, the control (5,341 ± 559.2 μm2, n = 5, p < 0.01) as well as the CVS (6,241 ± 423.1 μm2, n = 4, p < 0.001) mice fed a high-fat diet had significantly increased adipocyte size compared with the chow-fed groups (control mice 1,711 ± 275.4 μm2, CVS mice 930.7 ± 132.4 μm2, n = 2–4). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding CVS status (Fig. 7f).
CVS mice fed a high-fat diet actually had a significantly lower adrenal weight relative to total body weight (0.005688 ± 0.0002537%, n = 5, p < 0.01) when compared with CVS chow-fed mice (0.009121 ± 0.0007406%, n = 7) at the time they were killed. There were no significant differences among the groups in relation to chow consumption, CVS status or when total adrenal weights were compared (data not shown).