The role of hypothalamic kisspeptin in the reproductive axis is well established, but the effects of kisspeptin in peripheral tissues remain relatively unknown. The results presented here confirm our previous preliminary report that exogenous kisspeptin potentiated glucose-induced insulin secretion from isolated mouse islets [8], and further characterise this action. In the present study, kisspeptin enhanced both the first and second phases of the glucose-induced secretory response, but did not initiate a secretory response in the absence of a stimulatory concentration of glucose, consistent with the mode of action of many receptor-operated agonists that modulate the amplitude of nutrient-induced insulin secretory responses. The stimulatory effects of kisspeptin on insulin secretion were fully reversible, again consistent with a receptor-mediated action, and the islets were subsequently able to maintain glucose-induced insulin secretion suggesting that kisspeptin had no deleterious effects on the beta cells.
Little information is yet available about the biologically active concentrations of kisspeptin, and there are at least two possible sources of kisspeptin that may activate the beta cell GPR-54. Circulating levels of kisspeptin in humans are normally very low but increase markedly during pregnancy, and this circulating kisspeptin is assumed to be of placental origin [19]. Peak kisspeptin concentrations of approximately 2.5 nmol/l are detected during the third trimester in humans [19], but this is still somewhat lower than the concentrations of approximately 50 nmol/l that were required to stimulate insulin secretion from mouse islets in our in vitro experiments. To date there is no information about placental production or circulating levels of kisspeptin in mice, so it is possible that plasma kisspeptin levels during pregnancy reach higher levels in mice with their multiple placentas. Alternatively, it may be that islet GPR-54 is expressed to respond to locally released kisspeptin, as occurs in the hypothalamus, and our demonstration of the co-expression of kisspeptin and GPR-54 in islets is consistent with an intra-islet paracrine role for kisspeptin [8]. The concentration of a para/autocrine agent that will be achieved at its local sites of release and action is difficult to assess, but it is likely to be considerably higher than the concentration of the same agent in the peripheral circulation. This may explain why the potentiation of insulin release from isolated mouse islets required kisspeptin concentrations of around 50 nmol/l, which is considerably higher than the peripheral circulating concentrations of most peptide hormones.
Although the source of the kisspeptin that activates beta cell GPR-54 is uncertain, our results clearly demonstrate directly stimulatory effects of GPR-54 activation on nutrient-induced insulin secretion from isolated islets. The intracellular mechanisms involved in the effects of kisspeptin on beta cells are currently unknown, although a number of studies have investigated kisspeptin signalling in the hypothalamus [20, 21] and in tumour cell lines [1, 22]. Our experiments showed that kisspeptin had rapid stimulatory effects on beta cell cytosolic Ca2+, and that the effects of kisspeptin on insulin secretion were blocked by a PLC inhibitor, suggesting that kisspeptin potentiates glucose-induced insulin release from beta cells through GPR-54-linked PLC activation and increases in intracellular Ca2+, most likely through the generation of inositol triphosphate and subsequent liberation of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum. This signalling pathway has previously been shown to play an important role in mediating the effects of kisspeptin on gonadotrophin-releasing hormone release in the hypothalamus [20], suggesting some overlap in the intracellular pathways involved in the effects of kisspeptin in different tissues. Increases in intracellular Ca2+ were not observed in all beta cells in response to kisspeptin administration, suggesting functional heterogeneity among islet beta cells at the level of GPR-54 production or its intracellular coupling. This is not too surprising since it is well known that individual beta cells are heterogeneous and differ in their sensory [23], biosynthetic [24, 25], intracellular Ca2+ [26, 27] and secretory [28] responses. PLC activation is also associated with the generation of DAG and the subsequent activation of DAG-sensitive isoforms of protein kinase C, an important mechanism in the stimulation of insulin release by some receptor-mediated stimuli [22], including acetylcholine [17, 18] and cholecystokinin [29]. However, our results do not support a role for this pathway in mediating the effects of kisspeptin on beta cells. An inhibitor of the DAG-sensitive PKC isoforms (Gö6976) had no effect on kisspeptin-dependent potentiation of glucose-induced insulin release from isolated islets, and downregulating islet content of DAG-sensitive PKC isoforms by prolonged exposure to 4β-PMA [17, 18, 30] did not reduce the effects of kisspeptin on insulin secretion.
The p38 and p42/44 MAPK transduction cascades have been implicated in the effects of kisspeptin in hypothalamic neurones and in the CHO-K1 tumour cell line [1, 20], and the p42/44 MAPK pathway is important in mediating the effects of the calcium-sensing receptor on insulin release from beta cells [13]. Whilst the p38 MAPK pathway is involved in mediating the effects of kisspeptin on secretion of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in the hypothalamus [20], the p38 inhibitor, SB203580, had no effect on kisspeptin-induced insulin secretion in our experiments, suggesting that the intracellular systems through which kisspeptin acts on cells may be tissue specific. However, the results of the current study demonstrated that a p42/44 MAPK inhibitor, PD98059, completely blocked the effects of kisspeptin on insulin release, suggesting an involvement of this pathway in beta cells. The effects of p42/44 MAPK activation appear to be permissive rather than causal for kisspeptin-induced insulin secretion. Thus, the presence of a stimulatory concentration of glucose enhanced p42/44 MAPK activation, as has been reported previously [31, 32], and pharmacological inhibition of this activation blocked kisspeptin-induced insulin secretion in vitro. In contrast, kisspeptin had no effect on p42/44 MAPK phosphorylation irrespective of the ambient glucose concentration, suggesting that glucose-induced p42/44 MAPK activation is required for the potentiating effects of kisspeptin on insulin secretion, although p42/44 activation alone is insufficient to initiate a secretory response [31, 32]. These observations are consistent with a model in which nutrient-induced activation of p42/44 MAPK is not directly involved in the initiation of nutrient-induced insulin secretion, but enables the potentiation of nutrient-induced secretory responses by some receptor-operated stimuli, such as kisspeptin.
In contrast with the observed effects of kisspeptin to potentiate glucose-induced insulin secretion from isolated islets in vitro, a recent report suggests that kisspeptin inhibits the release of insulin from the perfused pancreas [33], raising the possibility that the effects of kisspeptin on islet function may be influenced by the in vivo environment. To determine whether the results obtained from our in vitro experiments in the present study are representative of the effects of kisspeptin on pancreatic islets in vivo, doses of kisspeptin previously shown to stimulate luteinising hormone release [15, 16] were administered to conscious, unrestrained rats. The results clearly demonstrated that exogenous kisspeptin stimulated insulin release in vivo in conscious rats, confirming the stimulatory effects on isolated islets in vitro. The immediate and sustained increase in plasma insulin levels induced by kisspeptin was not accompanied by detectable changes in blood glucose, presumably reflecting intact autoregulatory mechanisms in this model using non-anaesthetised, unrestrained animals. The unchanged levels of blood glucose also point to a direct effect of kisspeptin on pancreatic beta cells to stimulate insulin release, rather than a secondary effect through increasing blood glucose levels. Additionally, central administration of kisspeptin had no effect on plasma insulin, suggesting that the stimulation of insulin release by kisspeptin is mediated through a peripheral, as opposed to central, site of action. In both in vivo and in vitro experiments the effects of kisspeptin on insulin secretion were fully reversible, consistent with an effect mediated through the activation of a G-protein-coupled cell-surface receptor, such as GPR-54. The relatively prolonged effects of kisspeptin on insulin secretion in vivo and in vitro is in accordance with previous studies demonstrating sustained effects of kisspeptin in the hypothalamus for over 1 h after administration [15, 34]. Measurements using a commercially available assay suggested that the intravenous administration schedule used in our in vivo experiments produced increases in plasma kisspeptin (9 nmol/l) of the same order of magnitude as the physiological increases (2.5 nmol/l) reported in pregnant women [19], suggesting that there are circumstances where circulating kisspeptin could influence islet function. However, some caution is required in interpreting these data, since plasma kisspeptin can be difficult to measure accurately [35]. In the current study we used a human kisspeptin assay because there are no available assays for rat kisspeptin and the inter-species specificity of the assay is unknown. Irrespective of the absolute concentrations of kisspeptin achieved in our in vivo experiments, the kisspeptin-induced increase in plasma insulin suggests that in the whole animal, as in isolated islets, kisspeptin has a stimulatory effect on insulin release. It is unclear why an inhibitory effect is seen in the perfused pancreas model [33], and further work is required to determine the factors responsible for differences between the observed effects in different models.
Our in vitro studies demonstrated that the stimulatory effects of kisspeptin on insulin secretion were dependent on the presence of a stimulatory concentration of glucose, consistent with the known mechanisms of many other receptor-operated agonists which potentiate nutrient-induced secretion but do not initiate a secretory response [36]. In contrast, kisspeptin administration in vivo markedly increased plasma insulin levels in animals with normal non-fasted blood glucose levels. There are several possible reasons for our in vivo observations. Thus, it is difficult to extrapolate from precisely defined experimental conditions in vitro to the much more complex in vivo environment in which, for example, islets are exposed simultaneously to many circulating nutrients and non-nutrient stimuli, and to the influence of intact innervation. In addition, it is difficult to compare the concentrations of kisspeptin to which the islets are exposed in vitro and in vivo without detailed knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of kisspeptin after single intravenous administration, so the observed differences in the degree of glucose-dependency may reflect differences in the concentrations of kisspeptin to which the islets have been exposed.
In conclusion, pancreatic islets express both kisspeptin and its receptor GPR-54, suggesting an important role in the control of islet function; this is supported by our in vivo and in vitro observations of the stimulatory effects of exogenous kisspeptin on insulin secretion. The known involvement of kisspeptin in puberty [4, 5] and pregnancy [37, 38], and in mediating the effects of nutritional status on reproductive function [6, 7] raises the possibility that kisspeptin plays multiple roles as a physiological regulator of whole body fuel homeostasis, at least partly by regulating islet function.