Hybrid durum wheat: heterosis of grain yield and quality traits and genetic architecture of anther extrusion
Hybrid durum has a promising yield potential coupled with good quality, but the efficiency of hybrid seed production must be improved.
Hybrid breeding is a tremendous success story in many crops, but has not yet made a breakthrough in wheat, mainly due to inefficient hybrid seed production. In this study, we investigated the heterosis for grain yield and important quality traits in durum wheat of 33 hybrids built up from 24 parental lines, as well as the variation in anther extrusion and its genetic architecture in a vast collection of Central European elite durum lines. Average mid-parent heterosis for grain yield was 5.8%, and the best hybrids had a more than one ton per hectare higher grain yield than the best line cultivars. Furthermore, hybrids had a higher grain yield than lines at a given level of protein content or sedimentation value, underpinning their potential for a sustainable agriculture. However, seed set in our experimental hybrid seed production was low. We therefore evaluated 315 elite durum lines for visual anther extrusion, which revealed a large genetic variance and a heritability of 0.66. Results from association mapping suggest a mainly quantitative inheritance of visual anther extrusion with few putative QTL being identified, the largest one explaining less than 20% of the genotypic variance. Genome-wide prediction taking the four largest putative QTL into account yielded a mean cross-validated prediction ability of 0.55. Consequently, breeding for improved male floral characteristics is feasible in durum wheat, but should be mainly based on phenotypic selection.
W. Akel was financially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG LO 1816/4-1). We thank the three anonymous reviewer, whose input considerably improved the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The authors declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of Germany.
- CNR InterOmics (2017) CNR InterOmics Consortium. https://www.interomics.eu/wild-emmer-wheat-genome. Accessed 26 Oct 2017
- Coors JG, Pandey S (1999) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, MadisonGoogle Scholar
- d’Souza L (1970) Untersuchungen über die Eignung des Weizens als Pollenspender bei der Fremdbefruchtung, verglichen mit Roggen, Triticale und Secalutricum. Z Pflanzenzucht 63:246–269 (in German) Google Scholar
- Endelman JB, Jannink J-L (2012) Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix. G3 Genes Genomes. Genet 2:1405–1413Google Scholar
- Geiger HH, Miedaner T (1999) Hybrid rye and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 439–450Google Scholar
- Gilmour AR, Gogel BG, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hertfordshire. http://www.vsni.co.uk
- IWGSC et al (2018) Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 361:eaar7191Google Scholar
- Meuwissen T, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819–1829Google Scholar
- Money D, Gardner K, Migicovsky Z, Schwaninger H, Zhong G, Myles S (2015) LinkImpute: fast and accurate genotype imputation for non-model organisms. G3 Genes Genomes. Genet 5:2383–2390Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/
- Rapp M, Lein V, Lacourdre F, Lafferty J, Müller E, Vida G, Bozhanova V, Ibraliu A, Thorwarth P, Piepho HP, Leiser WL, Würschum T, Longin CFH (2018) Simultaneous improvement of grain yield and protein content in durum wheat by different phenotypic indices and genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet 131:1315–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Utz HF, Melchinger AE, Schön CC (2000) Bias and sampling error of the estimated proportion of genotypic variance explained by quantitative trait loci determined from experimental data in maize using cross validation and validation with independent samples. Genetics 154:1839–1849Google Scholar