Computation of the inverse additive relationship matrix for autopolyploid and multiple-ploidy populations
Rules to generate the inverse additive relationship matrix (A −1 ) are defined to enable the adoption restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) in autopolyploid populations with multiple ploidy levels.
Many important agronomic, horticultural, ornamental, forestry, and aquaculture species are autopolyploids. However, the adoption of restricted maximum likelihood (REML), for estimating co/variance components, and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), for predicting breeding values, has been hampered in autopolyploid breeding by the absence of an appropriate means of generating the inverse additive relationship matrix (A −1 ). This paper defines rules to generate the A −1 of autopolyploid populations comprised of individuals of the same or different ploidy-levels, including populations exhibiting (1) odd-numbered ploidy levels (e.g. triploids), (2) sex-based differences in the probability that gametic genes are identical by descent and (3) somatic chromosome doubling. Inbreeding, due to double reduction, in autopolyploid founders in the absence of mating among relatives is also accounted for. A previously defined approach is modified, whereby rules are initially defined to build an inverse matrix of kinship coefficients (K −1 ), which is then used to generate A −1 . An R package (polyAinv; https://github.com/mghamilton/polyAinv) to implement these rules has been developed and examples of analyses provided. The adoption of REML and BLUP methods made possible by these new rules has the potential to provide further insights into the quantitative genetic architecture of autopolyploid and multiple-ploidy populations, improve estimates of breeding values, and increase genetic gains made through recurrent selection.
Funding for this work was provided by the CSIRO Agriculture and Food project ‘Genomics platforms to assist applied aquaculture breeding’ (AgSIP53). We thank reviewers for their helpful comments.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of both authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Bharadwaj DN (2015) Polyploidy in crop improvement and evolution. In: Bahadur B, Rajam MV, Sahijram L, Krishnamurthy KV (eds) Plant biology and biotechnology, vol I. Plant diversity, organization, function and improvement. Springer, India, pp 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2286-6_24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bretagnolle F, Thompson JD (1995) Tansley review no 78. gametes with the somatic chromosome number—mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolyploid plants. New Phytol 129:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03005.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Colleter J, Penman DJ, Lallement S, Fauvel C, Hanebrekke T, Osvik RD, Eilertsen HC, D’Cotta H, Chatain B, Peruzzi S (2014) Genetic inactivation of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) eggs using UV-irradiation: observations and perspectives. PLOS One 9:ARTN e109572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, Forth edn. Longman, HarlowGoogle Scholar
- Gallais A (2003) Quantitative genetics and breeding methods in autopolyploid plants. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), ParisGoogle Scholar
- Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R (2014) ASReml user guide release 4.1 functional specification. VSN International Ltd, Hemel HempsteadGoogle Scholar
- Kempthorne O (1957) An introduction to genetic statistics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kerr RJ, Dutkowski GW, Li L, McRae TA, Novy R, Schneider B, Tier, B (2009) Integrated genetic analysis for potato improvement. In: 14th Australasian Plant Breeding Conference (APBC) and 11th Congress of the Society for the Advancement of Breeding Research in Asia and Oceania (SABRAO), Cairns, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Lien S, Gidskehaug L, Moen T, Hayes BJ, Berg PR, Davidson WS, Omholt SW, Kent MP (2011) A dense SNP-based linkage map for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) reveals extended chromosome homeologies and striking differences in sex-specific recombination patterns. BMC Genomics 12:Artn 615. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar