Bayesian estimation and use of high-throughput remote sensing indices for quantitative genetic analyses of leaf growth
- 590 Downloads
We develop Bayesian function-valued trait models that mathematically isolate genetic mechanisms underlying leaf growth trajectories by factoring out genotype-specific differences in photosynthesis. Remote sensing data can be used instead of leaf-level physiological measurements.
Characterizing the genetic basis of traits that vary during ontogeny and affect plant performance is a major goal in evolutionary biology and agronomy. Describing genetic programs that specifically regulate morphological traits can be complicated by genotypic differences in physiological traits. We describe the growth trajectories of leaves using novel Bayesian function-valued trait (FVT) modeling approaches in Brassica rapa recombinant inbred lines raised in heterogeneous field settings. While frequentist approaches estimate parameter values by treating each experimental replicate discretely, Bayesian models can utilize information in the global dataset, potentially leading to more robust trait estimation. We illustrate this principle by estimating growth asymptotes in the face of missing data and comparing heritabilities of growth trajectory parameters estimated by Bayesian and frequentist approaches. Using pseudo-Bayes factors, we compare the performance of an initial Bayesian logistic growth model and a model that incorporates carbon assimilation (A max) as a cofactor, thus statistically accounting for genotypic differences in carbon resources. We further evaluate two remotely sensed spectroradiometric indices, photochemical reflectance (pri2) and MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index (mtci) as covariates in lieu of A max, because these two indices were genetically correlated with A max across years and treatments yet allow much higher throughput compared to direct leaf-level gas-exchange measurements. For leaf lengths in uncrowded settings, including A max improves model fit over the initial model. The mtci and pri2 indices also outperform direct A max measurements. Of particular importance for evolutionary biologists and plant breeders, hierarchical Bayesian models estimating FVT parameters improve heritabilities compared to frequentist approaches.
We thank two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments that greatly improved the manuscript. University of Wyoming undergraduates E. Gimpel, J. Whipps, K. Anderson, M. Pratt, J. Beckius, C. Blumenshine, S. Cheeney, M. Yorgason, W. Gardner, C. Planche, C. Gifford, L. Lucas, K. Riggs, D. Larimer, D. Nykodym, and L. Steinken assisted with data collection and entry. M. Knapp (Kansas State University) provided temperature data. C. Seals and R. Pendleton facilitated plant growth. The manuscript was enriched by helpful discussions with R. J. C. Markelz (University of California, Davis & Revgenomics, Oakland CA) and the insight of our editor, Dr. H. Iwata (University of Tokyo).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
This work was supported by National Science Foundation grants IOS-1306574 to RLB, IOS-0923752 to C.W and SW, and IOS-1025965 to C.W. The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.
- Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lmer: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1, 1–7 ednGoogle Scholar
- Bradshaw AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 13:115–155Google Scholar
- Bustos-Korts D, Malosetti M, Chapman S, van Eeuwijk F (2016) Modelling of genotype by environment interaction and prediction of complex traits across multiple environments as a synthesis of crop growth modelling, genetics and statistics. In: Yin X, Struik PC (eds) Crop systems biology: narrowing the gaps between crop modelling and genetics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 55–82Google Scholar
- Chib S, Greenberg E (1995) Understanding the metropolis-hastings algorithm. Am Stat 49:327–335Google Scholar
- Christensen R, Johnson W, Branscum A, Hanson TE (2010) Bayesian ideas and data analysis: an introduction for scientists and statisticians. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Cover TM, Thomas JA (2013) Elements of information theory, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Glenn EP, Huete AR, Nagler PL, Nelson SG (2008) Relationship between remotely-sensed vegetation indices, canopy attributes and plant physiological processes: what vegetation indices can and cannot tell us about the landscape. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 8:2136–2160CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hinata K, Prakash S (1984) Ethnobotany and evolutionary origin of Indian oleiferous Brassicae. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 44:102–112Google Scholar
- Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of probability, 3rd edn. The Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Ji T, Liu P, Nettleton D (2012) Borrowing information across genes and experiments for improved error variance estimation in microarray data analysis. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 11(3):Article 12Google Scholar
- Kruschke JK (2015) Doing Bayesian data analysis: a tutorial with R, BUGS, and Stan, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Bojesen CRH (2015) lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-25. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
- Moczek AP, Sears KE, Stollewerk A, Wittkopp PJ, Diggle P, Dworkin I, Ledon-Rettig C, Matus DQ, Roth S, Abouheif E, Brown FD, Chiu C-H, Cohen CS, Tomaso AWD, Gilbert SF, Hall B, Love AC, Lyons DC, Sanger TJ, Smith J, Specht C, Vallejo-Marin M, Extavour CG (2015) The significance and scope of evolutionary developmental biology: a vision for the 21st century. Evol Dev 17:198–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peñuelas J, Baret F, Filella I (1995) Semi-empirical indices to assess carotenoids/chlorophyll a ratio from leaf spectral reflectance. Photosynthetica 31:221–230Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 3.2.3 edn. R Core Team, AustriaGoogle Scholar
- Rajapakse NC, Pollock RK, McMahon MJ, Kelly JW, Young RE (1992) Interpretation of light quality measurements and plant response in spectral filter research. HortScience 27:1208–1211Google Scholar