Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 130, Issue 11, pp 2361–2374 | Cite as

Phenotypic, genetic and molecular characterization of 7B-1, a conditional male-sterile mutant in tomato

  • Anna Pucci
  • Maurizio Enea Picarella
  • Andrea Mazzucato
Original Article


Key message

We characterized the photoperiod-sensitive 7B - 1 male-sterile mutant in tomato, showing its allelism with stamenless - 2 . Mapping experiments indicated SlGLO2 , a B-class MADS-box family member, as a strong candidate to underlie the 7B - 1 mutation.


The interest in male sterility (MS) dates back to a long time due to its perspective use in hybrid seed production. Here, we characterize 7B-1, a photoperiod-sensitive male-sterile (ms) mutant in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), in which stamens are restored to fertility by permissive growth conditions in short days (SD). This system represents a useful strategy to facilitate the maintenance of the ms line. Examination of 7B-1 and other structural mutants, vms, sl, sl-2 and tap3, showed carpellization of stamens in the third floral whorl. 7B-1 exhibits strong expressivity in long days (LD), producing 100% aberrant anthers and virtually no seed production under open pollination, whereas it recovered fertility in SD. By genetic analysis, we demonstrate that 7B-1 is not allelic to sl nor to vms; instead it shows allelism to sl-2. Because the homeotic phenotype of the mutation resembles lesions to members of the B-class MADS-box transcription factor family, that specify petal and stamen identity, we pursued a candidate gene approach towards these targets. Using an interspecific backcross mapping population and markers linked to B-class MADS-box genes, significant linkage was found between 7B-1 and the SlGLO2 gene on Chr6. This result was supported by the 7B-1 phenotype that is similar to that of SlGLO2 knock outs and by the strong downregulation of the gene in the mutant. Although the lesion underlying the mutant phenotype is still elusive, our results pave the way for the final demonstration that SlGLO2 underlies 7B-1 and further the use of 7B-1 mutant in tomato hybrid seed production schemes.



The authors thank Vipen K. Sawhney (University of Saskatchewan, Canada), Muriel Quinet (Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium) and the C.M. Rick Tomato Genetics Resource Center (TGRC, University of California, Davis, CA, USA) for help with seed supply. V.K. Sawhney, Martin Fellner (University of Olomouc, Czech Republic) and Vahid Omidvar (University of Minnesota, USA) are acknowledged for critical reading of the manuscript, and Marena Torelli for excellent assistance in growing the plants. Two reviewers who helped improving the manuscript with constructive comments and suggestions are also truly acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standard


This study was partly funded by the Italian Ministry for University and Research, project no. 2004071420, ‘Genetic dissection of the processes controlling male fertility: a basis for the development of male sterile plants’.

Conflict of interest

All authors have read the manuscript and declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

122_2017_2964_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (146 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 146 kb)


  1. Atanassova B, Georgiev H (2002) Using genic male sterility in improving hybrid seed production in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Acta Hortic 579:185–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai Y, Lindhout P (2007) Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: what have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Ann Bot 100:1085–1094CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergougnoux V, Hlavackova V, Plotzova R, Novak O, Fellner M (2009) The 7B-1 mutation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) confers a blue light-specific lower sensitivity to coronatine, a toxin produced by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. J Exp Bot 60:1219–1230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop CJ (1954) A stamenless male-sterile tomato. Am J Bot 4:540–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowman JL, Smyth DR (1999) CRABS CLAW, a gene that regulates carpel and nectary development in Arabidopsis, encodes a novel protein with zinc finger and helix–loop–helix domains. Development 126:2387–2396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Busi MV, Bustamante C, D’Angelo C, Hidalgo-Cuevas M, Boggio SB, Valle EM, Zabaleta E (2003) MADS-box genes expressed during tomato seed and fruit development. Plant Mol Biol 52:801–815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen J, Hu Q, Zhang Y, Lu C, Kuang H (2014) P-MITE: a database for plant miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements. Nucleic Acids Res 42(D1):D1176–D1181. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1000 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM (1991) The war of the whorls: genetics interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353:31–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Coker JS, Davies E (2003) Selection of candidate housekeeping controls in tomato plants using EST data. Biotechiniques 35:740–742Google Scholar
  10. de Martino G, Pana I, Emmanuel E, Levy A, Vivian F, Irish VF (2006) Functional analyses of two tomato APETALA3 genes demonstrate diversification in their roles in regulating floral development. Plant Cell 18:1833–1845CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Díez MJ (1999) Tipos varietales. In: Nuez F (ed) El cultivo del tomate. Mundi Prensa, Madrid, pp 93–129Google Scholar
  12. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  13. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1995) An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141:1147–1162PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Fellner M, Sawhney VK (2001) Seed germination in a tomato male sterile mutant is resistant to osmotic, salt and low temperature stresses. Theor Appl Genet 102:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fellner M, Sawhney VK (2002) The 7B-1 mutant in tomato shows blue-light-specific resistance to osmotic stress and abscisic acid. Planta 214:675–682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fellner M, Zhang R, Pharis RP, Sawhney VK (2001) Reduced deetiolation of hypocotyl growth in a tomato mutant is associated with hypersensitivity to, and high endogenous levels of abscisic acid. J Exp Bot 52:725–738CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Foolad MR (2007) Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. Int J Plant Genom 2007(64358):1–52. doi: 10.1155/2007/64358 Google Scholar
  18. Frankel R (1973) The use of male sterility in hybrid seed production. In: Moav R (ed) Agricultural genetics. Wiley, New York, pp 85–94Google Scholar
  19. Fulton TM, van der Hoeven R, Eannetta N, Tanksley S (2002) Identification, analysis and utilization of a conserved ortholog set (COS) markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell 14:1457–1467CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Geuten K, Irish VF (2010) Hidden variability of floral homeotic B genes in Solanaceae provides a molecular basis for the evolution of novel functions. Plant Cell 22:2562–2578CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Gómez P, Jamilena M, Capel J, Zurita S, Angosto T, Lozano R (1999) Stamenless, a tomato mutant with homeotic conversions in petals and stamens. Planta 209:172–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo X, Hu Z, Yin W, Yu X, Zhu Z, Zhang J, Chen G (2016) The tomato floral homeotic protein FBP1-like gene, SlGLO1, plays key roles in petal and stamen development. Sci Rep 6:20454. doi: 10.1038/srep20454 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Hafen L, Stevenson EC (1958) Preliminary studies of five stamenless mutants. Tomato Genet Cooper Rep 8:17–18Google Scholar
  24. Hemming MN, Trevaskis B (2010) Make hay when the sun shines: the role of MADS-box genes in temperature-dependant seasonal flowering responses. Plant Sci 180:447–453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hlavinka J, Nauš J, Fellner M (2013) Spontaneous mutation 7B-1 in tomato impairs blue light-induced stomatal opening. Plant Sci 209:75–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaul MLH (1988) Male sterility in higher plants. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kempken F, Pring DR (1999) Male sterility in higher plants- fundamentals and applications. Prog Bot 60:139–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kramer EM, Irish VF (1999) Evolution of genetic mechanisms controlling petal development. Nature 399:144–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kramer EM, Dorit RI, Irish VF (1998) Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and stamen development: duplication and divergence within the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics 149:765–778PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Lamb RS, Irish VF (2003) Functional divergence within the APETALA3/PISTILLATA floral homeotic gene lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:6558–6563CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee S, Lee S, Yang K-Y, Kim Y-M, Park S-Y, Kim SY, Soh M-S (2006) Overexpression of PRE1 and its homologous genes activates gibberellin-dependent responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 47:591–600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Leseberg CH, Eissler CL, Wang X, Johns MA, Duvall MR, Mao L (2008) Interaction study of MADS-domain proteins in tomato. J Exp Bot 59:2253–2265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Longin CF, Mühleisen J, Maurer HP, Zhang H, Gowda M, Reif JC (2012) Hybrid breeding in autogamous cereals. Theor Appl Genet 125:1087–1096. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1967-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lozano R, Angosto T, Gómez P, Payan C, Capel J, Huijser P, Salinas J, Martınez-Zapater JM (1998) Tomato flower abnormalities induced by low temperatures are associated with changes of expression of MADS-box genes. Plant Physiol 117:91–100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Mara CD, Huang T, Irish VF (2010) The Arabidopsis floral homeotic proteins APETALA3 and PISTILLATA negatively regulate the BANQUO genes implicated in light signaling. Plant Cell 22:690–702CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazzucato A, Taddei AR, Soressi GP (1998) The parthenocarpic fruit (pat) mutant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) sets seedless fruits and has aberrant anther and ovule development. Development 125:107–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mazzucato A, Olimpieri I, Siligato F, Picarella ME, Soressi GP (2008) Characterization of genes controlling stamen identity and development in a parthenocarpic tomato mutant indicates a role for the DEFICIENS ortholog in the control of fruit set. Physiol Plant 132:526–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nash AF, Gardner RG, Henderson WR (1985) Evaluation of allelism and seed set of eight stamenless tomato mutants. Hortic Sci 20:440–442Google Scholar
  40. Oki N, Yano K, Okumoto Y, Tsukiyama T, Teraishi M, Tanisaka T (2008) A genome-wide view of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) in rice, Oryza sativa ssp. japonica. Genes Genet Syst 83:321–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Omidvar V, Fellner M (2015) DNA methylation and transcriptomic changes in response to different lights and stresses in 7B-1 male-sterile tomato. PLoS ONE 10:e0121864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121864 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Omidvar V, Mohorianu I, Dalmay T, Zheng Y, Fei Z, Pucci A, Mazzucato A, Večeřová V, Sedlářova M, Fellner M (2017) Transcriptional regulation of male-sterility in 7B-1 male-sterile tomato mutant. PLoS ONE 12:e0170715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170715 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Ong-Abdullah M, Ordway JM, Jiang N, Ooi S-E, Kok S-Y, Sarpan N et al (2015) Loss of Karma transposon methylation underlies the mantled somaclonal variant of oil palm. Nature 525:533–537CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Ooijen JW, Voorrips RE (2001) JoinMap 3.0, software for calculation of genetic linkage maps. Plant Research International, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  45. Perez-Prat E, van Lookeren Campagne MM (2002) Hybrid seed production and the challenge of propagating male sterile plants. Trends Plant Sci 7:199–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Pnueli L, Abu-Abeid M, Zamir D, Nacken W, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Lifschitz E (1991) The MADS box gene family in tomato: temporal expression during floral development conserved secondary structures and homology with homeotic genes from Antirrhinum and Arabidopsis. Plant J 1:255–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Quinet M, Bataille G, Dobrev PI, Capel C, Gómez P, Capel J, Lutts S, Motyka V, Angosto T, Lozano R (2014) Transcriptional and hormonal regulation of petal and stamen development by STAMENLESS, the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) orthologue to the B-class APETALA3 gene. J Exp Bot 65:2243–2256CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Rick CM, Boynton JE (1967) A temperature sensitive male-sterile mutant of the tomato. Am J Bot 54:601–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruiu F, Picarella ME, Imanishi S, Mazzucato A (2015) A transcriptomic approach to identify regulatory genes involved in fruit set of wild-type and parthenocarpic tomato genotypes. Plant Mol Biol 89:263–278. doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0367-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sablowski RWM, Meyerowitz EM (1998) Temperature-sensitive splicing in the floral homeotic mutant apetala3-1. Plant Cell 10:1453–1463CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Sawhney VK (1974) Morphogenesis of the stamenless-2 mutant of tomato. III. Relative levels of gibberellins in the normal and mutant plants. J Exp Bot 25:1004–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sawhney VK (1983) Temperature control of male sterility in a tomato mutant. J Hered 74:51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sawhney VK (1994) Genic male sterility in tomato and its manipulations in breeding. In: Williams EG, Clarke AE, Knox RB (eds) Genetic control of self-incompatibility and reproductive development in flowering plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 443–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sawhney VK (1997) Genic male sterility. In: Shivanna KR, Sawhney VK (eds) Pollen biotechnology for crop production and improvement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sawhney VK (2004) Photoperiod-sensitive male-sterile mutant in tomato and its potential use in hybrid seed production. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 79:138–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sawhney VK, Greyson RI (1973) Morphogenesis of the stamenless-2 mutant in tomato. I. Comparative description of the flowers and ontogeny of stamens in the normal and mutant plants. Am J Bot 60:514–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sawhney VK, Polowick P (1986) Temperature-induced modifications in the surface features of stamens of a tomato mutant: an SEM study. Protoplasma 131:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmidt V, Schmidt H (1981) Untersuchungen an pollensterilen, stamenlessahnlichen Mutanten von Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. I. Die anterementwickiung in deu Mutanten ms-15 und ms-33. Biol Zbl 100:679–689Google Scholar
  59. Schnable PS, Wise RP (1998) The molecular basis of cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration. Trends Plant Sci 3:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sheoran IS, Ross ARS, Olson DJH, Sawhney VK (2009) Differential expression of proteins in the wild type and 7B-1 male-sterile mutant anthers of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum): a proteomic analysis. J Proteom 71:624–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Singh S, Sawhney VK (1998) Abscisic acid in a male sterile tomato mutant and its regulation by low temperature. J Exp Bot 49:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Theissen G (2001) Development of floral organ identity: stories from the MADS house. Curr Opin Struct Biol 4:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vandenbussche M, Theissen G, Van de Peer Y, Gerats T (2003) Structural diversification and neo-functionalization during floral MADS-box gene evolution by C-terminal frameshift mutations. Nucleic Acids Res 31:4401–4409CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Virmani SS, Sun ZX, Mou TM, Jauhar AA, Mao CX (2003) Two-line hybrid rice breeding manual. International Rice Research Institute, Los BañosGoogle Scholar
  65. Wuest SE, O’Maoileidigh DS, Rae L, Kwasniewska K, Raganelli A, Hanczaryk K, Lohan A, Loftus B, Graciet E, Wellmer F (2012) Molecular basis for the specification of floral organs by APETALA3 and PISTILLATA. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:13452–13457CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Zachgo S, Silva EA, Motte P, Tröbner W, Saedler H, Schwarz-Sommer Z (1995) Functional analysis of the Antirrhinum floral homeotic DEFICIENS gene in vivo and in vitro by using a temperature-sensitive mutant. Development 121:2861–2875PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang R, Guoa C, Zhanga W, Wang P, Li L, Duana X, Du Q, Zhao L, Shan H, Hodges SA, Kramer EM, Ren Y, Kong H (2013) Disruption of the petal identity gene APETALA3-3 is highly correlated with loss of petals within the buttercup family (Ranunculaceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:5074–5079CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhou H, Liu Q, Li J, Jiang D, Zhou L, Wu P, Lu S, Li F, Zhu L, Liu Z, Chen L, Liu YG, Zhuang C (2012) Photoperiod- and thermo-sensitive genic male sterility in rice are caused by a point mutation in a novel noncoding RNA that produces a small RNA. Cell Res 22:649–660. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.28 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE)University of TusciaViterboItaly

Personalised recommendations