Exploring new alleles for frost tolerance in winter rye
- 351 Downloads
Rye genetic resources provide a valuable source of new alleles for the improvement of frost tolerance in rye breeding programs.
Frost tolerance is a must-have trait for winter cereal production in northern and continental cropping areas. Genetic resources should harbor promising alleles for the improvement of frost tolerance of winter rye elite lines. For frost tolerance breeding, the identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) and the choice of optimum genome-based selection methods are essential. We identified genomic regions involved in frost tolerance of winter rye by QTL mapping in a biparental population derived from a highly frost tolerant selection from the Canadian cultivar Puma and the European elite line Lo157. Lines per se and their testcrosses were phenotyped in a controlled freeze test and in multi-location field trials in Russia and Canada. Three QTL on chromosomes 4R, 5R, and 7R were consistently detected across environments. The QTL on 5R is congruent with the genomic region harboring the Frost resistance locus 2 (Fr–2) in Triticeae. The Puma allele at the Fr–R2 locus was found to significantly increase frost tolerance. A comparison of predictive ability obtained from the QTL-based model with different whole-genome prediction models revealed that besides a few large, also small QTL effects contribute to the genomic variance of frost tolerance in rye. Genomic prediction models assigning a high weight to the Fr–R2 locus allow increasing the selection intensity for frost tolerance by genome-based pre-selection of promising candidates.
This research was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Germany) within the project RYE SELECT (Grant ID 0315946). The authors are grateful to the field and lab team of KWS Lochow GmbH and to Stefan Schwertfirm and Amalie Fiedler from TUM for the technical assistance. The technical assistance of G. Schellhorn, Plant Sciences Department, University of Saskatchewan is also gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Prof. Dr. H. Friedrich Utz (University of Hohenheim) for providing an extension of PlabMQTL which enabled the comparison of QTL and GP models.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
The authors declare that this study complies with the current laws of the countries in which the experiments were performed.
- Butler D, Cullis B, Gilmour A, Gogel B (2009) ASReml-R reference manual. Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, ToowoombaGoogle Scholar
- Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S, Meister A, Lysák MA, Nardi L, Obermayer R (1998) Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: inter-laboratory comparison. Ann Bot 82:17–26Google Scholar
- Fowler DB, Limin AE (1987) Exploitable genetic-variability for cold tolerance in commercially grown cereals. Can J Plant Sci 67:278Google Scholar
- Holland J, Nyquist W, Cervantes-Martínez C (2003) Estimating and interpreting heritability for plant breeding: an update. Plant Breed Rev 22:9–112Google Scholar
- Li Y, Böck A, Haseneyer G, Korzun V, Wilde P, Schön C-C, Ankerst D, Bauer E (2011a) Association analysis of frost tolerance in rye using candidate genes and phenotypic data from controlled, semi-controlled, and field phenotyping platforms. BMC Plant Biol 11:146CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- McCouch S, Baute GJ, Bradeen J, Bramel P, Bretting PK, Buckler E, Burke JM, Charest D, Cloutier S, Cole G, Dempewolf H, Dingkuhn M, Feuillet C, Gepts P, Grattapaglia D, Guarino L, Jackson S, Knapp S, Langridge P, Lawton-Rauh A, Lijua Q, Lusty C, Michael T, Myles S, Naito K, Nelson RL, Pontarollo R, Richards CM, Rieseberg L, Ross-Ibarra J, Rounsley S, Hamilton RS, Schurr U, Stein N, Tomooka N, van der Knaap E, van Tassel D, Toll J, Valls J, Varshney RK, Ward J, Waugh R, Wenzl P, Zamir D (2013) Agriculture: feeding the future. Nature 499:23–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McIntosh R, Yamazaki Y, Dubcovsky J, Rogers W, Morris C, Appels R, Xia X (2013) Catalogue of Gene Symbols for Wheat. 12th International Wheat Genetic Symposium. Yokohama, Japan, September, 8–13, 2013Google Scholar
- Meyer RS, Choi JY, Sanches M, Plessis A, Flowers JM, Amas J, Dorph K, Barretto A, Gross B, Fuller DQ, Bimpong IK, Ndjiondjop M-N, Hazzouri KM, Gregorio GB, Purugganan MD (2016) Domestication history and geographical adaptation inferred from a SNP map of African rice. Nat Genet 48:1083–1088CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miedaner T (2013) Roggenanbau: Eine erfolgreiche Alternative. DLG-Verlag GmbH, AgrarPraxis kompaktGoogle Scholar
- Millet EJ, Welcker C, Kruijer W, Negro S, Coupel-Ledru A, Nicolas SD, Laborde J, Bauland C, Praud S, Ranc N, Presterl T, Tuberosa R, Bedő Z, Draye X, Usadel B, Charcosset A, Van Eeuwijk F, Tardieu F (2016) Genome-wide analysis of yield in Europe: allelic effects vary with drought and heat scenarios. Plant Physiol 172:749–764PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Schwegler DD, Gowda M, Schulz B, Miedaner T, Liu W, Reif JC (2014) Genotypic correlations and QTL correspondence between line per se and testcross performance in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) for the three agronomic traits beet yield, potassium content, and sodium content. Mol Breed 34:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 58:267–288Google Scholar
- Utz HF (2011) PlabMQTL-Software for meta-QTL analysis with composite interval mapping. Version 0.9. Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science, and Population Genetics, University of HohenheimGoogle Scholar
- Van Ooijen JW (2006) JoinMap 4, software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Kyazma B V, WageningenGoogle Scholar