Improving resistance to the European corn borer: a comprehensive study in elite maize using QTL mapping and genome-wide prediction
- 714 Downloads
The efficiency of marker-assisted selection for native resistance to European corn borer stalk damage can be increased when progressing from a QTL-based towards a genome-wide approach.
Marker-assisted selection (MAS) has been shown to be effective in improving resistance to the European corn borer (ECB) in maize. In this study, we investigated the performance of whole-genome-based selection, relative to selection based on individual quantitative trait loci (QTL), for resistance to ECB stalk damage in European elite maize. Three connected biparental populations, comprising 590 doubled haploid (DH) lines, were genotyped with high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers and phenotyped under artificial and natural infestation in 2011. A subset of 195 DH lines was evaluated in the following year as lines per se and as testcrosses. Resistance was evaluated based on stalk damage ratings, the number of feeding tunnels in the stalk and tunnel length. We performed individual- and joint-population QTL analyses and compared the cross-validated predictive abilities of the QTL models with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). For all traits, the GBLUP model consistently outperformed the QTL model despite the detection of QTL with sizeable effects. For stalk damage rating, GBLUP’s predictive ability exceeded at times 0.70. Model training based on DH line per se performance was efficient in predicting stalk breakage in testcrosses. We conclude that the efficiency of MAS for ECB stalk damage resistance can be increased considerably when progressing from a QTL-based towards a genome-wide approach. With the availability of native ECB resistance in elite European maize germplasm, our results open up avenues for the implementation of an integrated genome-based selection approach for the simultaneous improvement of yield, maturity and ECB resistance.
KeywordsQuantitative Trait Locus Double Haploid Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Marker Double Haploid Line
The authors thank the MCQTL development team, in particular Brigitte Mangin and Sylvain Jasson, who provided technical advice on how to implement parts of our cross-validation procedure for the MCQTL software. We also thank Sylwia Schepella, Stefan Schwertfirm, Felicitas Dittrich, Iris Leineweber, Georg Maier and Kurt Walter for their technical assistance and Florian Steinbacher from the Gewächshauslaborzentrum Dürnast for providing access to the climate chambers for cultivating the corn borer larvae. The authors are also grateful to the field team of the LfL maize breeding group for their excellent technical assistance at the Freising field location and to the field team from the KWS breeding station in Gondelsheim for their help with artificial infestation and stalk dissection at the Münzesheim field location. This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) under the “Innovationsförderung” programme (FKZ: 2814504610).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The experiments reported in this study comply with the current laws of Germany.
- Anderson JA, Chao S, Liu S (2008) Molecular breeding using a major QTL for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Crop Sci 47:112–119Google Scholar
- Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ (2009) ASReml-R reference manual. Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, ToowoombaGoogle Scholar
- Cahill DJ, Schmidt DH (2004) Use of marker assisted selection in a product development breeding program. In: Proceedings of 4th International Crop Science Congress, 26 Sep–1 Oct 2004, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Charcosset A, Mangin B, Moreau L, Combes L, Jourjon M-F, Gallais A (2001) Heterosis in maize investigated using connected RIL populations. Quantitative genetics and breeding methods: the way ahead. Les colloques 96, INRA Editions, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
- Ducrocq S, Madur D, Veyrieras J-B, Camus-Kulandaivelu L, Kloiber-Maitz M, Presterl T, Ouzunova M, Manicacci D, Charcosset A (2008) Key impact of Vgt1 on flowering time adaptation in maize: evidence from association mapping and ecogeographical information. Genetics 178:2433–2437CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ganal MW, Durstewitz G, Polley A, Bérard A, Buckler ES, Charcosset A, Clarke JD, Graner E-M, Hansen M, Joets J, Le Paslier M-C, McMullen MD, Montalent P, Rose M, Schön C-C et al (2011) A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome. PLoS One 6:e28334CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1981) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
- Holland JB, Nyquist WE, Cervantes-Martínez CT (2003) Estimating and interpreting heritability for plant breeding: an update. In: Janick J (ed) Plant Breeding Reviews, vol 22. Wiley, Oxford, pp 9–112Google Scholar
- Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
- Hudon M, Chiang MS (1991) Evaluation of resistance of maize germplasm to the univoltine European corn borer Ostrinia naubilalis (Hübner) and relationship with maize maturity in Quebec. Maydica 36:69–74Google Scholar
- Jarvis JL, Guthrie WD (1980) Resistance of maize plant introductions to sheath-collar feeding by 2nd-generation European corn borers. Maydica 25:25–32Google Scholar
- Mangin B, Cathelin R, Delannoy D, Escalière B, Lambert S, Marcel J, Ngom B, Jourjon M-F, Rahmani A, Jasson S (2010) MCQTL: a reference manual. Rapport Ubia Toulouse N° 2010/1–February 2010. Département de Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), FranceGoogle Scholar
- Meissle M, Mouron P, Musa T, Bigler F, Pons X, Vasileiadis VP, Otto S, Antichi D, Kiss J, Pálinkás Z, Dorner Z, Van Der Weide R, Groten J, Czembor E, Adamczyk J et al (2010) Pests, pesticide use and alternative options in European maize production: current status and future prospects. J Appl Entomol 134:357–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mihm JA (1983) Efficient mass rearing and infestation techniques to screen for host plant resistance to maize stem borers, Diatratea spp. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
- Papst C, Melchinger AE, Eder J, Schulz B, Klein D, Bohn M (2001) QTL mapping for resistance to European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hb.) in early maturing European dent maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm and comparison of genomic regions for resistance across two populations of F3 families. Maydica 46:195–205Google Scholar
- Papst C, Bohn M, Utz HF, Melchinger AE, Klein D, Eder J (2004) QTL mapping for European corn borer resistance (Ostrinia nubilalis Hb.), agronomic and forage quality traits of testcross progenies in early-maturing European maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. Theor Appl Genet 108:1545–1554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2013) R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Röber FK, Gordillo GA, Geiger HH (2005) In vivo haploid induction in maize—performance of new inducers and significance of doubled haploid lines in hybrid breeding. Maydica 50:275–283Google Scholar
- Rogers JS (1972) Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distances. Stud Genet 7213:145–153 Univ Texas PublGoogle Scholar
- Salvi S, Sponza G, Morgante M, Tomes D, Niu X, Fengler KA, Meeley R, Ananiev EV, Svitashev S, Bruggemann E, Li B, Hainey CF, Radovic S, Zaina G, Rafalski J-A et al (2007) Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize. PNAS 104:11376–11381CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Technow F, Bürger A, Melchinger AE (2013) Genomic prediction of northern corn leaf blight resistance in maize with combined or separated training sets for heterotic groups. G3(3):197–203Google Scholar
- Tefera T, Mugo S, Tende R, Likhayo P (2011) Methods of screening maize for resistance to stem borers and post-harvest insect pests. CIMMYT, NairobiGoogle Scholar
- Utz HF (2011) PLABSTAT v3A. A computer program for statistical analysis of plant breeding experiments. Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Van Ooijen JW (2006) JoinMap® 4, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Kyazma BV, Wageningen, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar