Skip to main content
Log in

Selecting subsets of genotyped experimental populations for phenotyping to maximize genetic diversity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selective phenotyping is a way of capturing the benefits of large population sizes without the need to carry out large-scale phenotyping and hence is a cost-effective means of capturing information about gene–trait relationships within a population. The diversity within the sample gives an indication of the efficiency of this information capture; less diversity implies greater redundancy of the genetic information. Here, we propose a method to maximize genetic diversity within the selected samples. Our method is applicable to general experimental designs and robust to common problems such as missing data and dominant markers. In particular, we discuss its application to multi-parent advanced generation intercross (MAGIC) populations, where, although thousands of lines may be genotyped as a large population resource, only hundreds may need to be phenotyped for individual studies. Through simulation, we compare our method to simple random sampling and the minimum moment aberration method. While the gain in power over simple random sampling for all tested methods is not large, our method results in a much more diverse sample of genotypes. This diversity can be applied to improve fine mapping resolution once a QTL region has been detected. Further, when applied to two wheat datasets from doubled haploid and MAGIC progeny, our method detects known QTL for small sample sizes where other methods fail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ansari-Mahyari S, Berg P, Lund MS (2009) Fine mapping quantitative trait loci under selective phenotyping strategies based on linkage and linkage disequilibrium criteria. J Anim Breed Genet 126:443–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368:455–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Broman KW, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill GA (2003) R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19:889–890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh C, Morell M, Mackay I, Powell W (2008) From mutations to MAGIC: resources for gene discovery, validation and delivery in crop plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:215–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh CR, Taylor J, Larroque O, Coombes N, Verbyla AP, Nath Z et al (2010) Sponge and dough bread making: genetic and phenotypic relationships with wheat quality traits. Theor Appl Genet 121:815–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York. ISBN 0-471-16240-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombes NE (2002) The reactive tabu search for efficient correlated experimental designs. Ph.D. thesis, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool

  • Franco J, Crossa J, Warburton ML, Taba S (2006) Sampling strategies for conserving maize diversity when forming core subsets using genetic markers. Crop Sci 46:854–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagneur J, Elze MC, Tresch A (2011) Selective phenotyping, entropy reduction, and the Mastermind game. BMC Bioinform 12:406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang BE, George AW (2009) Look before you leap: a new approach to mapping QTL. Theor Appl Genet 119:899–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang BE, George AW (2011) R/mpMap: a computational platform for the genetic analysis of multi-parent recombinant inbred lines. Bioinformatics 27:727–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang BE, Cavanagh C, Rampling L, Kilian A, George AW (2012a) iDArTs: increasing the value of genomic resources at no cost. Mol Breed. doi:10.1007/s11032-011-9676-5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang BE, George AW, Forrest KL, Kilian A, Hayden MJ, Morell MK, Cavanagh CR (2012b) A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross population for genetic analysis in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00702.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard P (1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bul Soc Vaudoise Sci Natl 44:223–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannink J-L (2005) Selective phenotyping to accurately map quantitative trait loci. Crop Sci 45:901–908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin C, Lan H, Attie AD, Churchill GA, Bulutuglo D, Yandell BS (2004) Selective phenotyping for increased efficiency in genetic mapping studies. Genetics 168:2285–2293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes GJ, Paolillo DJ, Sorrells ME (1989) The effects of dwarfing genes Rht1 and Rht2 on cellular dimensions and rate of leaf elongation in wheat. Ann Bot 64:683–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Kover PX, Valdar W, Trakalo J, Scarcelli N, Ehrenreich IM, Purugganan MC et al (2009) A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross to fine map quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 5:e1000551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manichaikul A, Dupuis J, Sen S, Broman KW (2006) Poor performance of bootstrap confidence intervals for the location of a quantitative trait locus. Genetics 174:481–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi SA, Prasanna BM (2003) Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants—salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci 43:1235–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist WE (1962) Differential fertilization in the inheritance of stem rust resistance in hybrids involving a common wheat strain derived from Triticum timopheevii. Genetics 47:1109–1124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Frisch M (2005) Genetical and mathematical properties of similarity and dissimilarity coefficients applied in plant breeding and seed bank management. Crop Sci 45:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, URL http://www.R-project.org, ISBN 3-900051-07-0

  • Smith AB, Liw P, Cullis BR (2006) The design and analysis of multi-phase plant breeding experiments. J Agric Sci 144:393–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Snokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • The Complex Trait Consortium (2004) The collaborative cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat Genet 36:1133–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani R, Walther G, Hastie T (2001) Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. J Royal Statist Soc B 63:411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JH Jr (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Statist Assoc 58:235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Holland JB, McMullen MD, Buckler ES (2008) Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 178:539–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Emma Huang.

Additional information

Communicated by I. Mackay.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 280 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emma Huang, B., Clifford, D. & Cavanagh, C. Selecting subsets of genotyped experimental populations for phenotyping to maximize genetic diversity. Theor Appl Genet 126, 379–388 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1986-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1986-4

Keywords

Navigation