Table 2 Significant QTL detected for all the traits based on CIM analysis with LOD > LOD threshold (2.86 for the female map and 2.90 for the male map)
Traitsa | No. QTLb | Location of QTLc (nb of year of detection)d |
|---|---|---|
Development | ||
FD | 4 | IIb-m (2), IIIa-m (2), IIIc1-m (1), IVa-m (1) |
FL | 7 | IIa-f (1), IIc-m (3), IIIa-m (1), IIId-m (1), IVd2-f (1), Vb-f (1), VIb-m (1) |
FD/FL | 5 | IIIa-m (3)/f (2), IIId-m (2), Va-m (2), Vb-m (1), VIa-m (2) |
DW | 3 | IIIa-f (1), VIa-m (1), VIIb-m (1) |
FW | 3 | Ia-f (1), IIb-m (2), IIIc1-m (1) |
RD | 6 | IIb-m (1), IIId-f (1), IVc-m (1), Vc-m (1), VIb-m (1), VIIa-m (2) |
Firmness | ||
FIRM | 7 | IIb-m (1), IIIa-m (1), IIIa-f (1), IIIb-m (1), IIIc-f (1), IVa-f (1), Vc-m/f (1) |
Colour | ||
a | 6 | Ia-f (1), IIa-f (3), IVd-m (1), Vb-m (1), VIa-m/f (2), VIb-f (1) |
b | 4 | Ia-m (1), IIIa-f (1), VIa-m/f (2), VIb-f (1) |
L | 4 | IIa-f (1), IIIa-m/f (2), IVd-m (1), VIa-m (2) |
ANTH | 5 | Ia-f (1), IIa-f (2), IIIa-f (1), VIa-m/f (2), VIb-f (1) |
Sugar-related traits | ||
SSC | 3 | IIIa-m/f (1), Va-f (1), VIa-m/f (2) |
FRU | 2 | IVb-m (1), Vc-f (1) |
GLU | 5 | Ib-f (1), IIIa-f (1), IIIc-f (1), IVa-f (1), VIa-f (1) |
SUCR | 2 | VIa-m (1), VIIa-f (2) |
Acid-related traits | ||
pH | 6 | Ia-m (1), IIIb-m (1), IIIc-f (1), IVc-f (1), Vb-f (1), VIa-f (1) |
TA | 5 | Ia-m (1), IIc-m (1), IIId-m (1), IVa-f (1), Vb-m/f (2) |
CIT | 6 | Ia-f (1), IIc-m (1), IIIa-f (1), Vb-f (1), VIa-f (1), VIIb-f (1) |
MAL | 4 | Vd-f (1), VIa-m (1), VIb-m (1), VIId-m (1) |