Abstract
Application of marker-assisted backcrossing for gene introgression is still limited by the high costs of marker analysis. High-throughput (HT) assays promise to reduce these costs, but new selection strategies are required for their efficient implementation in breeding programs. The objectives of our study were to investigate the properties of HT marker systems compared to single-marker (SM) assays, and to develop optimal selection strategies for marker-assisted backcrossing with HT assays. We employed computer simulations with a genetic model consisting of 10 chromosomes of 160 cM length to investigate the introgression of a dominant target gene. We found that a major advantage of HT marker systems is that they can provide linkage maps with equally spaced markers, whereas the possibility to provide linkage maps with high marker densities smaller than 10 cM is only of secondary use in marker-assisted backcrossing. A three-stage selection strategy that combines selection for recombinants at markers flanking the target gene with SM assays and genome-wide background selection with HT markers in the first backcross generation was more efficient than genome-wide background selection with HT markers alone. Selection strategies that combine SM and HT assays were more efficient than genome-wide background selection with HT assays alone. This result was obtained for a broad range of cost ratios of HT and SM assays. A further considerable reduction of the costs could be achieved if the population size in the first backcross generation was twice the population size in generations BC2 and BC3 of a three-generation backcrossing program. We conclude that selection strategies combining SM and HT assays have the potential to greatly increase the efficiency and flexibility of marker-assisted backcrossing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bouchez A, Hospital F, Causse M, Gallais A, Charcosset A (2002) Marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles at quantitative trait loci between maize elite lines. Genetics 162:1945–1959
Collard BCY, Mackill DJ (2008) Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Phil Trans R Soc 363:557–572
Falke KC, Frisch M (2011) Power and false positive rate in QTL detection with near-isogenic line libraries. Heredity 106:576–584
Falke KC, Miedaner T, Frisch M (2009) Selection strategies for the development of rye introgression libraries. Theor Appl Genet 119:595–603
Frisch M, Melchinger AE (2001) Marker-assisted backcrossing for introgression of a recessive gene. Crop Sci 41:1485–1494
Frisch M, Melchinger AE (2001) Marker-assisted backcrossing for simultaneous introgression of two genes. Crop Sci 41:1716–1725
Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (1999) Comparison of selection strategies for marker-assisted backcrossing of a gene. Crop Sci 39:1295–1301
Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (1999) Minimum sample size and optimal positioning of flanking markers in marker-assisted backcrossing for transfer of a target gene. Crop Sci 39:967–975
Gupta PK, Roy JK, Prasad M (2001) Single nucleotide polymorphisms: a new paradigm for molecular marker technology and DNA polymorphism detection with emphasis on their use in plants. Curr Sci 80:524–535
Hospital F, Charcosset A (1997) Marker-assisted introgression of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 147:1469–1485
Hospital F, Chevalet C, Mulsant P (1992) Using markers in gene introgression breeding programs. Genetics 132:1199–1210
Maurer HP, Melchinger AE, Frisch M (2008) Population genetic simulation and data analysis with Plabsoft. Euphytica 161:133–139
Peleman JD, van der Voort JR (2003) Breeding by design. Trends Plant Sci 7:330–334
Prigge V, Maurer HP, Mackill DJ, Melchinger AE, Frisch M (2008) Comparison of the observed with the simulated distributions of the parental genome contribution in two marker-assisted backcross programs in rice. Theor Appl Genet 116:739–744
Prigge V, Melchinger AE, Dhillon BS, Frisch M (2009) Efficiency gain of marker-assisted backcrossing by sequentially increasing marker densities over generations. Theor Appl Genet 119:23–32
Ragot M, Lee M (2007) Marker-assisted selection in maize: current status, potential, limitations and perspectives from the private and public sectors. In: Guimaraes EP, Ruane J, Scherf BD, Sonnino A, Dargie JD (eds) Marker-assisted selection. Current status and future perspectives in crops, livestock, forestry and fish. FAO, Rome, pp 117–150
Ribaut JM, Jiang C, Hoisington D (2002) Simulation experiments on efficiencies of gene introgression by backcrossing. Crop Sci 42:557–565
Schön CC, Melchinger AE, Boppenmaier J, Brunklaus-Jung E, Herrmann RG, Seitzer JF (1994) RFLP mapping in maize: quantitative trait loci affecting testcross performance of elite European flint lines. Crop Sci 34:378–389
Syvänen AC (2005) Toward genome-wide SNP genotyping. Nat Genet 37:S5–S10
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their helpful suggestions. In particular, we gratefully acknowledge the comments of one reviewer that considerably improved the manuscript. We thank Gregory Mahone for proof-reading the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Y. Xu.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herzog, E., Frisch, M. Selection strategies for marker-assisted backcrossing with high-throughput marker systems. Theor Appl Genet 123, 251–260 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1581-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1581-0