Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 122, Issue 3, pp 543–553 | Cite as

Genotypic effects on the frequency of homoeologous and homologous recombination in Brassica napus × B. carinata hybrids

  • Annaliese S. Mason
  • Matthew N. Nelson
  • Marie-Claire Castello
  • Guijun Yan
  • Wallace A. Cowling
Original Paper


We investigated the influence of genotype on homoeologous and homologous recombination frequency in eight different Brassica napus (AACnCn) × B. carinata (BBCcCc) interspecific hybrids (genome composition CnCcAB). Meiotic recombination events were assessed through microsatellite marker analysis of 67 unreduced microspore-derived progeny. Thirty-four microsatellite markers amplified 83 A-, B-, Cn- and Cc-genome alleles at 64 loci, of which a subset of seven markers amplifying 26 alleles could be used to determine allele copy number. Hybrid genotypes varied significantly in loss of A- and B-genome alleles (P < 0.0001), which ranged from 6 to 22% between hybrid progeny sets. Allele copy number analysis revealed 19 A–C, 3 A–B and 10 B–C duplication/deletion events attributed to homoeologous recombination. Additionally, 55 deletions and 19 duplications without an accompanying dosage change in homoeologous alleles were detected. Hybrid progeny sets varied in observed frequencies of loss, gain and exchange of alleles across the A and B genomes as well as in the diploid C genome. Self-fertility in hybrid progeny decreased as the loss of B-genome loci (but not A-genome loci) increased. Hybrid genotypes with high levels of homologous and homoeologous exchange may be exploited for genetic introgressions between B. carinata and B. napus (canola), and those with low levels may be used to develop stable synthetic Brassica allopolyploids.

Supplementary material

122_2010_1468_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (53 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 52 kb)
122_2010_1468_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (46 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 45 kb)


  1. Armstrong KC, Keller WA (1981) Chromosome pairing in haploids of Brassica campestris. Theor Appl Genet 59:49–52Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong KC, Keller WA (1982) Chromosome pairing in haploids of Brassica oleracea. Can J Genet Cytol 24:735–739Google Scholar
  3. Choudhary BR, Joshi P, Ramarao S (2000) Interspecific hybridization between Brassica carinata and Brassica rapa. Plant Breed 119:417–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cousin A, Nelson M (2009) Twinned microspore-derived embryos of canola (Brassica napus L.) are genetically identical. Plant Cell Rep 28:831–835CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eenink AH (1975) Matromorphy in Brassica oleracea L. VII. Research on products of microsporogenesis and gametogenesis from prickle pollinated plants. Euphytica 24:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fukushima E (1930) Formation of diploid and tetraploid gametes in Brassica. Jpn J Bot 5:273–284Google Scholar
  7. Gaeta RT, Pires JC (2010) Homoeologous recombination in allopolyploids: the polyploid ratchet. New Phytol 186:18–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaeta RT, Pires JC, Iniguez-Luy F, Leon E, Osborn TC (2007) Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype. Plant Cell 19:3403–3417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Harberd DJ, McArthur ED (1980) Meiotic analysis of some species and genus hybrids in the Brassiceae. In: Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez-Campo C (eds) Brassica crops and wild allies: biology and breeding. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, pp 65–87Google Scholar
  10. Henry IM, Dilkes BP, Comai L (2006) Molecular karyotyping and aneuploidy detection in Arabidopsis thaliana using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction. Plant J 48:307–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Heyn FJ (1977) Analysis of unreduced gametes in the Brassiceae by crosses between species and ploidy levels. Z Pflanzenzüchtg 78:13–30Google Scholar
  12. Jenczewski E, Eber F, Grimaud A, Huet S, Lucas MO, Monod H, Chèvre AM (2003) PrBn, a major gene controlling homeologous pairing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) haploids. Genetics 164:645–653PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lagercrantz U, Lydiate DJ (1996) Comparative genome mapping in Brassica. Genetics 144:1903–1910PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Leflon M, Eber F, Letanneur JC, Chelysheva L, Coriton O, Huteau V, Ryder CD, Barker G, Jenczewski E, Chèvre AM (2006) Pairing and recombination at meiosis of Brassica rapa (AA) × Brassica napus (AACC) hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 113:1467–1480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Li M, Qian W, Meng J, Li Z (2004) Construction of novel Brassica napus genotypes through chromosomal substitution and elimination using interploid species hybridization. Chromosome Res 12:417–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu Z, Adamczyk K, Manzanares-Dauleux M, Eber F, Lucas M-O, Delourme R, Chèvre AM, Jenczewski E (2006) Mapping PrBn and other quantitative trait loci responsible for the control of homeologous chromosome pairing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) haploids. Genetics 174:1583–1596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lysak MA, Koch MA, Pecinka A, Schubert I (2005) Chromosome triplication found across the tribe Brassiceae. Genome Res 15:516–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mackay GR, Low RJ (1975) Spontaneous triploids in forage kale, Brassica oleracea var. acephala. Euphytica 24:525–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mason A, Huteau V, Eber F, Coriton O, Yan G, Nelson MN, Cowling WA, Chèvre A-M (2010) Genome structure affects the rate of autosyndesis and allosyndesis in AABC, BBAC and CCAB Brassica interspecific hybrids. Chromosome Res 18:655–666CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mizushima U (1980) Genome analysis in Brassica and allied genera. In: Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez-Campo C (eds) Brassica crops and wild allies: biology and breeding. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, pp 89–106Google Scholar
  21. Moyes CL, Lilley JM, Casais CA, Cole SG, Haeger PD, Dale PJ (2002) Barriers to gene flow from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) into populations of Sinapis arvensis. Mol Ecol 11:103–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson MN, Nixon J, Lydiate DJ (2005) Genome-wide analysis of the frequency and distribution of crossovers at male and female meiosis in Sinapis alba L. (white mustard). Theor Appl Genet 111:31–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nelson MN, Mason AS, Castello M-C, Thomson L, Yan G, Cowling WA (2009) Microspore culture preferentially selects unreduced (2n) gametes from an interspecific hybrid of Brassica napus L. × Brassica carinata Braun. Theor Appl Genet 119:497–505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nicolas SD, Mignon GL, Eber F, Coriton O, Monod H, Clouet V, Huteau V, Lostanlen A, Delourme R, Chalhoub B, Ryder CD, Chèvre AM, Jenczewski E (2007) Homeologous recombination plays a major role in chromosome rearrangements that occur during meiosis of Brassica napus haploids. Genetics 175:487–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicolas SD, Leflon M, Monod H, Eber F, Coriton O, Huteau V, Chèvre AM, Jenczewski E (2009) Genetic regulation of meiotic cross-overs between related genomes in Brassica napus haploids and hybrids. Plant Cell 21:373–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Prakash S (1973) Haploidy in Brassica nigra Koch. Euphytica 22:613–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prakash S (1974) Probable basis of diploidization of Brassica juncea Coss. Can J Genet Cytol 16:232–234Google Scholar
  28. Raemakers CJJM, Jacobsen E, Visser RGF (1995) Secondary somatic embryogenesis and applications in plant breeding. Euphytica 81:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ramsey J, Schemske DW (1998) Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:467–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roy NN (1984) Interspecific transfer of Brassica juncea-type blackleg resistance to Brassica napus. Euphytica 33:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sheidai M, Noormohamandi Z, Sotodeh M (2006) Cytogenetic variability in several canola (Brassica napus) cultivars. Caryologia 59:267–276Google Scholar
  32. Song KM, Lu P, Tang KL, Osborn TC (1995) Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implications for polyploid evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:7719–7723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Szadkowski E, Eber F, Huteau V, Lodé M, Huneau C, Belcram H, Coriton O, Manzanares-Dauleux MJ, Delourme R, King GJ, Chalhoub B, Jenczewski E, Chèvre AM (2010) The first meiosis of resynthesized Brassica napus, a genome blender. New Phytol 186:102–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tokumasu S (1965) On the origin of the matromorphic plants of Brassica japonica obtained from the cross between Brassica and Raphanus. J Jpn Soc Horticul Sci 34:79–88Google Scholar
  35. U N (1935) Genome-analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot 7:389–452Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annaliese S. Mason
    • 1
  • Matthew N. Nelson
    • 1
  • Marie-Claire Castello
    • 1
  • Guijun Yan
    • 1
  • Wallace A. Cowling
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Plant Biology and The UWA Institute of Agriculture, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural SciencesThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations