Skip to main content

Reanalyses of the historical series of UK variety trials to quantify the contributions of genetic and environmental factors to trends and variability in yield over time

Theoretical and Applied Genetics volume 122, pages 225–238 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Historical datasets have much to offer. We analyse data from winter wheat, spring and winter barley, oil seed rape, sugar beet and forage maize from the UK National List and Recommended List trials over the period 1948–2007. We find that since 1982, for the cereal crops and oil seed rape, at least 88% of the improvement in yield is attributable to genetic improvement, with little evidence that changes in agronomy have improved yields. In contrast, in the same time period, plant breeding and changes in agronomy have contributed almost equally to increased yields of forage maize and sugar beet. For the cereals prior to 1982, contributions from plant breeding were 42, 60 and 86% for winter barley, winter wheat and spring barley, respectively. These results demonstrate the overwhelming importance of plant breeding in increasing crop productivity in the UK. Winter wheat data are analysed in more detail to exemplify the use of historical data series to study and detect disease resistance breakdown, sensitivity of varieties to climatic factors, and also to test methods of genomic selection. We show that breakdown of disease resistance can cause biased estimates of variety and year effects, but that comparison of results between fungicide treated and untreated trials over years may be a means to screen for durable resistance. We find the greatest sensitivities of the winter wheat germplasm to seasonal differences in rainfall and temperature are to summer rainfall and winter temperature. Finally, for genomic selection, correlations between observed and predicted yield ranged from 0.17 to 0.83. The high correlation resulted from markers predicting kinship amongst lines rather than tagging multiple QTL. We believe the full value of these data will come from exploiting links with other experiments and experimental populations. However, not to exploit such valuable historical datasets is wasteful.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  • Akbari M, Wenzl P, Caig V, Carling J, Xia L, Yang S, Uszynski G, Mohler V, Lehmensiek A, Kuchel H, Hayden MJ, Howes N, Sharp P, Vaughan P, Rathmell B, Huttner E, Kilian A (2006) Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for high-throughput profiling of the hexaploid wheat genome. Theor Appl Genet 113:1409–1420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berry PM, Spink JH (2006) A physiological analysis of oilseed rape yields: past and future. J Agric Sci 144:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosemark NO (1993) Chapter 3. Genetics and breeding. In: Cooke DA, Scott RK (eds) The sugar beet crop. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancourt-Hulmel M, Doussinault G, Lecomte C, Bérard P, Le Buanec B, Trottet M (2003) Genetic improvement of agronomic traits of winter wheat cultivars released in France from 1946 to 1992. Crop Sci 43:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Survey of Fertilizer Practice (2007) Fertilizer use on farm crops for crop year. http://www.defra.gov.uk/evidence/statistics/foodfarm/enviro/fertiliserpractice/index.htm

  • Calderini DF, Slafer GA (1998) Changes in yield and yield stability in wheat during the 20th century. Field Crops Res 57:335–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossa J, Burgueño J, Dreisigacker S, Vargas M, Herrera-Foessel SA, Lillemo M, Singh RP, Trethowan R, Warburton M, Franco J, Reynolds M, Crouch JH, Ortiz R (2007) Association analysis of historical bread wheat germplasm using additive genetic covariance of relatives and population structure. Genetics 177:1889–1913

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2009) United Kingdom cereal yields, 1885 onwards. http://www.defra.gov.uk/evidence/statistics/foodfarm/index.htm

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to Quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longmans Green, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Feil B (1992) Breeding progress in small grain cereals—a comparison of old and modern cultivars. Plant Breed 108:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer RA, Edmeades GO (2010) Breeding and cereal yield progress. Crop Sci 50:S85–S98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG, Zobel RW (1996) Chapter 4. AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG (eds) Genotype by environment interaction. CRC Press, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard M (2009) Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136:245–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1984) Applications of linear models in animal breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph

    Google Scholar 

  • HGCA Recommended Lists (2009). http://www.hgca.com

  • Horvath A, Didier A, Koenig J, Exbrayat F, Charmet G, Balfourier F (2009) Analysis of diversity and linkage disequilibrium along chromosome 3B of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 119:1523–1537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jannink J-L, Lorenz AJ, Iwata H (2010) Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 9:166–177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraakman ATW, Niks RE, Van den Berg PMMM, Stam P, Van Eeuwijk FA (2004) Linkage disequilibrium mapping of yield and yield stability in modern spring barley cultivars. Genetics 168:435–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SH, van der Werf JHJ, Ben J. Hayes BJ, ME Goddard, Visscher PM (2008) Predicting unobserved phenotypes for complex traits from whole-genome SNP Data. PLoS Genetics 4(10):1000231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay IJ, Powell W (2007) The significance and relevance of linkage disequilibrium and association mapping in crops. Trends Plant Sci 12:53–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malosetti M, van der Linden CG, Vosman B, van Eeuwijk FA (2007) A mixed-model approach to association mapping using pedigree information with an illustration of resistance to Phytophthora infestans in potato. Genetics 175:879–889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald A, Riha S, DiTommaso A, DeGaetano A (2009) Climate change and the geography of weed damage: analysis of U.S. maize systems suggests the potential for significant range transformations. Agric Ecosyst Environ 130:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meteorological Office Hadley Centre Observation Data. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/2001/

  • Patterson HD, Williams ER (1976) A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika 63:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson HD, Williams ER, Hunter EA (1978) Block designs for variety trials. J Agric Sci 90:395–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RW, Murray DA, Harding SA, Baird DB, Soutar DM (2007) GenStat for windows introduction, 10th edn. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon JD, Ober ES, Qi A, Clark CJA, Royal A, Jaggard KW (2006) Using multi-environment sugar beet variety trials to screen for drought tolerance. Field Crops Res 95:268–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP (2009) Ridge regression and extensions for genomewide selection in maize. Crop Sci 49:1165–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP, Möhring (2006) Selection in cultivar trials—is it ignorable? Crop Sci 46:192–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP, Möhring J, Melchinger AE, Büchse A (2007) BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2005) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvey V (1978) The contribution of new varieties to increasing cereal yield in England and Wales. J Natl Inst Agric Bot 14:367–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvey V (1981) The contribution of new wheat, barley and oat varieties to increasing yield in England and Wales. J Natl Inst Agric Bot 15:399–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvey V (1986) The contribution of new varieties to cereal yields in England and Wales between 1947 and 1983. J Natl Inst Agric Bot 17:155–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvey V (1999) NIAB Recommended lists of cereal varieties: an aid to orderly marketing in the United Kingdom. Plant Varieties Seeds 12:23–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobart R (2009) Oilseeds and pulses in rotation. http://www.hgca.com/publications/documents/5_-_Ron_Stobart_TAG.pdf

  • Storey JD (2002) A direct approach to false discovery rates. J R Stat Soc Ser B 64:479–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey JD, Tibshirani R (2003) Statistical significance for genome-wide experiments. Proc Natl Academy of Sci 100:9440–9445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wellington PS, Silvey V (1997) Crop and seed improvement. A history of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 1919–1996. National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • White J, Law JR, Mackay I, Chalmers KJ, Smith JSC, Kilian A, Powell W (2008) The genetic diversity of UK, US and Australian cultivars of Triticum aestivum measured by DArT markers and considered by genome. Theor Appl Genet 116:439–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker JC, Thompson R, Denham MC (2000) Marker-assisted selection using ridge regression. Genet Res 75:249–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong S, Dekkers JCM, Fernando RL, Jannink J-L (2009) Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a barley case study. Genetics 182:355–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was jointly funded by the British Society of Plant Breeders and the National Institute of Agricultural Botany Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 OLE, UK

    I. Mackay, A. Horwell, J. Garner, J. White, J. McKee & H. Philpott

Authors
  1. I. Mackay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Horwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Garner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. McKee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. Philpott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Mackay.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Waugh.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 181 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mackay, I., Horwell, A., Garner, J. et al. Reanalyses of the historical series of UK variety trials to quantify the contributions of genetic and environmental factors to trends and variability in yield over time. Theor Appl Genet 122, 225–238 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1438-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1438-y

Keywords

  • Sugar Beet
  • Winter Wheat
  • Variety Effect
  • Genomic Selection
  • DArT Marker