Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 114, Issue 6, pp 1117–1127 | Cite as

The Horn of Africa as a centre of barley diversification and a potential domestication site

  • Jihad Orabi
  • Gunter Backes
  • Asmelash Wolday
  • Amor Yahyaoui
  • Ahmed Jahoor
Original Paper

Abstract

According to a widely accepted theory on barley domestication, wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) from the Fertile Crescent is the progenitor of all cultivated barley (H. vulgare ssp. vulgare). To determine whether barley has undergone one or more domestication events, barley accessions from three continents have been studied (a) using 38 nuclear SSR (nuSSRs) markers, (b) using five chloroplast SSR (cpSSR) markers yielding 5 polymorphic loci and (c) by detecting the differences in a 468 bp fragment from the non-coding region of chloroplast DNA. A clear separation was found between Eritrean/Ethiopian barley and barley from West Asia and North Africa (WANA) as well as from Europe. The data from chloroplast DNA clearly indicate that the wild barley (H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum) as it is found today in the “Fertile Crescent” might not be the progenitor of the barley cultivated in Eritrea (and Ethiopia). Consequently, an independent domestication might have taken place at the Horn of Africa.

References

  1. Abbo S, Lev-Yadun S, Ladizinsky G (2001) Tracing the wild genetic stocks of crop plants. Genome 44:309–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Åberg E (1949) The taxonomy and phylogeny of Hordeum L. sec. Cerealis Ands., with special reference to Tibetan barleys. Symb Bot Upsal 4:1–156Google Scholar
  3. Badr A, Müller K, Schäfer-Pregl R, El Rabez H, Effgen S, Ibrahim HH, Pozzi C, Rohde W, Salamini F (2000) On the origin and domestication history of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Mol Biol Evol 14:499–510Google Scholar
  4. Becker J, Heun M (1995) Barley microsatellites—allele variation and mapping. Plant Mol Biol 27:835–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjørnstad Å, Demissie A, Kilian A, Kleinhofs A (1997) The distinctness and diversity of Ethiopian barleys. Theor Appl Genet 94:514–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. von Bothmer R, Sato K, Komatsudam T, Yasuda S, Fischbeck G (2003) The domestication of cultivated barley. In: von Bothmer R, van Hintum T, Knüpffer H, Sato K (eds) Diversity in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Elsevier Science B V, Amsterdam, pp 9–27Google Scholar
  7. Ceccarelli S, Grando S, van Leur JAG (1987) Genetic diversity in barley landraces from Syria and Jordan. Euphytica 36:389–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demissie A, Bjørnstad Å, Kleinhofs A (1998) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in landrace barleys from Ethiopia in relation to geographic, altitude and agro-ecological factors. Crop Sci 38:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinf Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
  10. Fischbeck G (1992) Barley cultivar development in Europe—success in the past and possilbe changes in the future. In: Munk L (eds) Proceedings of the 6th barley genetics symposium. Munksgaard International, Copenhagen, pp 885–901Google Scholar
  11. Fröst S, Holme G, Asker S (1975) Flavonoid patterns and phylogeny of barley. Hereditas 79:133–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garvin DF, Brown AHD, Burdon JJ (1997) Inheritance and chromosome locations of scald-resistance genes derived from Iranian and Turkish wild barleys. Theor Appl Genet 94:1086–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harlan JR, Zohary D (1966) Distribution of wild wheats and barley. Science 153:1074–1089CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. van Hintum TJL (1999) The general methodology for creating a core collection. In: Johnson RD, Hodgkin T (eds) Core collections for today and tomorrow. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, pp 10–17Google Scholar
  15. Holwerda BC, Jana S, Crosbi WL (1986) Chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA variation in Hordeum vulgare and Hordeum spontaneum. Genetics 114:1271–1291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jahoor A, Fischbeck G (1993) Identification of new genes for mildew resistance of barley at the Mla locus in lines derived from Hordeum spontaneum. Plant Breed 110:116–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jobb G (2004) TREEFINDER version of June 2004. http://www.treefinder-de
  18. Liu K, Muse S (2005) PowerMarker: new genetic data analysis software. Version 3.23. http://www.powermarker.net
  19. Liu Z-W, Biyashev RM, Saghai-Maroof AS (1996) Development of simple sequence repeat DNA markers and their integration into a barley linkage map. Theor Appl Genet 93:869–876Google Scholar
  20. Matus IA, Hayes PM (2002) Genetic diversity in three groups of barley germplasm assessed by simple sequence repeats. Genome 45:1095–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Molina-Cano JL, Fra-Mon P, Salcedo G, Aragoncillo C, Roca de Togores F, García-Omedo F (1987) Morocco as a possible domestication center for barley: biochemical and agromorphological evidence. Theor Appl Genet 73:531–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Molina-Cano JL, Moralejo M, Igartua E, Romagosa I (1999) Further evidence supporting Morocco as a centre of origin of barley. Theor Appl Genet 98:913–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Molina-Cano JL, Russell JR, Moralejo MA, Escacena JL, Arias G, Powell W (2005) Chloroplast DNA microsatellite analysis supports a polyphyletic origin for barley. Theor Appl Genet 110:613–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neale DB, Saghai-Maroof MA, Allard RW, Zhang Q, Jørgensen RA (1988) Chloroplast DNA diversity in populations of wild and cultivated barley. Genetics 120:1105–1110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Negassa M (1985) Patterns of phenotypic diversity in an Ethiopian barley collection, and the Arussi-Bale Highland as a center of origin of barley. Hereditas 102:139–150Google Scholar
  26. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nevo E (1998) Genetic diversity in wild cereals: regional and local studies and their bearing on conservation ex situ and in situ. Genet Resour Crop Evol 45:355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Piffanelli P, Ramsay L, Waugh R, Benabdelmouna A, D’Hont A, Hollricher K, Jørgensen JH, Schulze-Lefert P, Panstruga R (2004) A barley cultivation-associated polymorphism conveys resistance to powdery mildew. Nature 430:887–891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Powell W, Machray G, Provan J (1996) Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci 1:215–222Google Scholar
  30. Provan J, Russell J, Booth A, Powell W (1999) Polymorphic chloroplast simple sequence repeat primers for systematic and population studies in the genus Hordeum. Mol Ecol 8:505–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Provan J, Powell W, Hollingsworth PM (2001) Chloroplast microsatellites: new tools for studies in plant ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 16:142–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramsay L, Macaulay M, Ivanissevich SD, MacLean K, Cardle L, Fuller J, Edwards KJ, Tuvesson S, Morgante M, Massari A, Maestri E, Marmiroli N, Sjakste T, Ganal M, Powell W, Waugh R (2000) A simple sequence repeat-based linkage map of barley. Genetics 156:1997–2005PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Russell J, Ellis RP, Thomas WTB, Waugh R, Provan J, Booth A, Fuller J, Lawrence P, Young G, Powell W (2000) A retrospective analysis of spring barley germplasm development from ‘foundation genotypes’ to currently successful cultivars. Mol Breed 6:553–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saghai Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jørgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population-dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci Unit States Am 81:8014–8018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saltonstall K (2001) A set of primers for amplification of noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA in the grasses. Mol Ecol Notes 1:76–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Small RL, Ryburn JA, Cronn R C, Seelanan T, Wendel JF (1998) The tortoise and the hare: choosing between noncoding plastome and nuclear Adh sequences for phylogeny reconstruction in a recently diverged plant group. Am J Bot 85:1301–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith SE (1989) Biparental inheritance of organelles and its implications in crop improvement. Plant Breed Rev 6:361–393Google Scholar
  38. Tanksley SD, McCouch SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063–1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vanichanon A, Blake NK, Sherman JD, Talbert LE (2003) Multiple origins of allopolyploid Aegilops triuncialis. Theor Appl Genet 105:804–810Google Scholar
  40. Woodhead M, Russell J, Squirrell J, Hollingsworth PM, Mackenzie K, Gibby M, Powell W (2005) Comparative analysis of population genetic structure in Athyrium distentifolium (Pteridophyta) using AFLPs and SSRs from anonymous and transcribed gene regions. Mol Ecol 14:1681–1695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jihad Orabi
    • 1
    • 4
  • Gunter Backes
    • 1
  • Asmelash Wolday
    • 2
  • Amor Yahyaoui
    • 3
  • Ahmed Jahoor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural SciencesThe University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Life SciencesFrederiksberg, CopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.National Agricultural Research Institute (NARI), Ministry of Agriculture of the Government of EritreaHalhale, AsmaraEritrea
  3. 3.International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)AleppoSyria
  4. 4.General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research (GCSAR)Douma, DamascusSyria

Personalised recommendations