Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 113, Issue 3, pp 439–451 | Cite as

Microsatellite segregation analysis and cytogenetic evidence for tetrasomic inheritance in the American yam Dioscorea trifida and a new basic chromosome number in the Dioscoreae

  • Mustapha Bousalem
  • Gemma Arnau
  • Isabelle Hochu
  • Richard Arnolin
  • Véronique Viader
  • Sylvain Santoni
  • Jacques David
Original Paper

Abstract

Despite the economic and cultural importance of the indigenous “Amerindian” yam Dioscorea trifida, very little is known about their origin, phylogeny, diversity and genetics. Consequently, conventional breeding efforts for the selection of D. trifida genotypes resistant to potyviruses which are directly involved in the regression of this species have been seriously limited. Our objective of this paper is to contribute to the clarification of the cytogenetic status, i.e., inheritance and chromosome number. Our results provide genetic evidence supporting tetrasomic behaviour of the genome of D. trifida based on chromosomal segregation pattern analysis using eight SSRs markers in three different crosses. This is the first reliable evidence of an autopolyploid species in the genus Dioscorea. The second major result in this study is the revealing of a new base chromosome number in the botanical section Macrogynodium to which D. trifida belongs. To date, our assumptions about the ploidy level of yams are based on the observations that the basic chromosome number is 10 or 9, and D. trifida was described as octoploid. The chromosome number of D. trifida accessions was also assessed using somatic chromosomic count techniques. Flow cytometry did not show significant variation of 2C DNA content among 80 accessions indicating homogeneity of the ploidy level of the cultivated D. trifida. This suggests that autotetraploidy is well established as well as the rule for the cultivated pool of D. trifida, even if the direct diploid ancestor remains to be identified. The data presented in this paper are significant and important for the effective breeding and conservation of the species and for elucidating the phylogeny and the origins of the yam and the evolution of the genus Dioscorea.

References

  1. Abraham KA (1998) Occurrence of hexaploid males in Dioscorea alata L. Euphytica 99:5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abraham KA, Nair PG (1990) Vegetative and pseudogamous parthenocarpy in Dioscorea alata. J Root Crops 16:58–60Google Scholar
  3. Allendorf FW, Danzmann RG (1997) Secondary tetrasomic segregation of MDH-Band preferential pairing of homeologues in Rainbow Trout. Genetics 145:1083–1092PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayensu ES, Coursey DG (1972) Guinea yams. The botany, ethnobotany, use and possible future of yams in West Africa. Econ Bot 26:301–318Google Scholar
  5. Bai KV, Jos JS, Hrishi N (1978) Polyploidy in the variety spinosa of D. esculenta. J Root Crops 4:11–14Google Scholar
  6. Baquar SR (1980) Chromosome behaviour in Nigerian yams (Dioscorea). Genetica 54:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bever JD, Felber F (1992) The theoretical population genetics of autopolyploidy. Ox Surv Evol Biol 8:185–217Google Scholar
  8. Bousalem M, Douzery EJ, Fargette D (2000) High genetic diversity, distant phylogenetic relationships and intraspecies recombination events among natural populations of Yam mosaic virus: a contribution to understanding potyvirus evolution. J Gen Virol 81:243–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bousalem M, Dallot S, Fuji S, Natsuaki KT (2003) Origin, world-wide dispersion, bio-geographical diversification, radiation and recombination: an evolutionary history of Yam mild mosaic virus (YMMV). Infect Genet Evol 3:189–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burkill IH (1960) The organography and the evolution of the Dioscoreaceae, the family of the yams. J Linn Soc (Bot) Lond 56:319–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caddick LR, Wilkin P, Rudall PJ, Chase MW, Hedderson TAJ (2002) A formal revised classification of Dioscoreales. Taxon 51:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coursey DG (1967) Yams. Longmans Green, London, pp 28–67Google Scholar
  13. Degras L (1993) The yam. A tropical root crop. In: Coste R (ed) Macmillan/CTA, London and Basingstoke, 408 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Demarly Y (1958) Contribution à l’étude des tétraploides. Ann Génét 34:25–39Google Scholar
  15. Dolezel J, Binarova P, Lucretti S (1989) Analysis of nuclear DNA content in plant cells by flow cytometry. Biol Plant 31:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Essad S (1984) Variation géographique des nombres chromosomiques de base et polyploïdie dans le genre Dioscorea à propos du dénombrement des espèces transversa Brown, pilosiuscula Bert et trifida. Agronomie 4:611–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fjellstrom RG, Beuselinck PR, Steiner JJ (2001) RFLP marker analysis supports tetrasomic inheritance in Lotus corniculatus L. Theor Appl Genet 102:718–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henry VCR (1967) Studies on botanical and agronomic characteristics in cush-cush (Dioscorea trifida L). Thesis, Anonymous McGill University Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  19. Hochu I, Santoni S, Bousalem M (2006) Isolation, characterization and cross-species amplification of microsatellite DNA loci in the tropical American yam Dioscorea trifida. Mol Ecol Notes 6:137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson RC, Casey J (1982) Cytogenetic analysis of autopolyploids: models and methods for triploids to octoploids. Am J Bot 69:487–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jannoo N, Grivet L, David J, D’Hont A, Glaszmann JC (2004) Differential chromosome pairing affinities at meiosis in polyploid sugarcane revealed by molecular markers. Heredity 93(5):460–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jos JS, Bai KV, Hrishi N (1976) Polarity of metaphase plate in Dioscorea hispida Dennst. Curr Sci 45:770–771Google Scholar
  23. Knuth R (1924) Dioscoreaceae. Pflanzenreich 87(IV, 43):1–278Google Scholar
  24. Krebs SL, Hancock JF (1989) Tetrasomic inheritance of isoenzyme markers in the highbush bluebeny, Vaccinium colymbesum L. Heredity 63:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin FW, Degras L (1978) Tropical yams and their potential. Part 6 Minor cultivated Dioscorea species. Agricultural handbook no 538. Anonymous Science and Education Administration, US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and USAID, Washington, 23 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin FW, Ortiz S (1963) Chromosome numbers and behaviour in some species of Dioscorea. Cytologia 28:96–101Google Scholar
  27. Mignouna HD, Mank RA, Ellis THN, van den Bosch N, Asiedu R, Ng SYC, Peleman P (2002a) A genetic linkage map of Guinea yam (Dioscorea rotundataPoir) based on AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 105:716–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mignouna HD, Mank RA, Ellis THN, van den Bosch N, Asiedu R, Ng SYC, Peleman P (2002b) A genetic linkage map of water yam (Dioscorea alata L.) based on AFLP markers and QTL analysis for anthracnose resistance. Theor Appl Genet 105:726–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olson MS (1997) Bayesian procedures for discriminating among hypotheses with discrete distributions: inheritance in the tetraploid Astilbe biternub. Genetics 147:1933–1942PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Qu L, Hancock JF (1995) Nature of 2n gamete formation and mode of inheritance in interspecific hybrids of diploid Vaccinium darrowii and tetraploid V. corymbosum. Theor Appl Genet 91:1309–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raghavan SR (1958) A chromosome survey of Indian Dioscorea. Proc Indian Acad Sci Sec B 48:59–63Google Scholar
  32. Raghavan SR (1959) A note on some South Indian species of the genus Dioscorea. Curr Sci 28:337–338Google Scholar
  33. Ramachandran K (1968) Cytological studies in Dioscorea. Cytologia 33:401–410Google Scholar
  34. Scarcelli N, Daïnou O, Agbangla C, Tostain S, Pham JL (2005) Segregation patterns of isozyme loci and microsatellite markers show the diploidy of African yam Dioscorea rotundata (2n = 40). Theor Appl Genet 111:226–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Segarra-Moragues JG, Catalán P (2003) Life history variation between species of the relictual genus Borderea(Dioscoreaceae): phylogeography, genetic diversity, and population genetic structure assessed by RAPD markers. Biol J Linn Soc 80:483–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Segarra-Moragues JG, Palop-Esteban M, Gonza’Lez-Candelas F, Catalán P (2004) Characterization of seven (CTT)n microsatellite loci in the Pyrenean Endemic Borderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae): remarks on ploidy level and hybrid origin assessed through allozymes and microsatellite analyses. J Hered 95:177–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharma AK, De DN (1956) Polyploidy in Dioscorea. Genetica 28:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shiotani, I, Kawase T (1989) Genomic structure of sweet potato and hexaploids in Ipomoea trifida(HBK) Don. Jpn J Breed 39:57–66Google Scholar
  39. Soltis DE, Riesberg LH (1986) Autopolyploidy in Tolmiea mziesii (Saxifragaceae): genetic insights from enzyme electrophoresis. Am J Bot 73:310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soltis DE, Soltis PS (1993) Molecular data and the dynamic nature of polyploidy. Crit Rev Plant Sci 12:243–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soltis DE, Soltis PS (1999) Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 14: 348–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Jennifer A, Tate JA (2003) Advances in the study of polyploidy since plant speciation. New Phytol 161:173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Pires JC, Kovarik A, Tate JA, Mavrodiev E (2004) Recent and recurrent polyploidy in Tragopogon (Asteraceae): cytogenetic, genomic and genetic comparisons. Biol J Linn Soc 82:485–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York, 643 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Sybenga J (1969) Allopolyploidization of autopolyploids. I. Possibilities and limitations. Euphytica 18:252–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Terauchi R, Konuma A (1994) Microsatellite polymorphism in Dioscorea tokoro, a wild yam species. Genome 37:794–801PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Thompson JD, Lumaret R (1992) The evolutionary dynamics of polyploid plants: origins, establishment and persistence. Trends Ecol Evol 7:302–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tostain S, Scarcelli N, Brottier P, Marchand JL, Pham JL, Noyer JL (2006) Development of DNA microsatellite markers in tropical yam (Dioscorea sp.). Mol Ecol Notes 6:173. DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01182.xGoogle Scholar
  49. Watson LE, Elisens WJ, Estes JR (1991) Electrophoretic and cytogenetic evidence for allopolyploid origin of Manhullia mohrii (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 78:408–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zoundjihekpon J, Essad S, Tio-Touré B (1990) Dénombrement chromosomique dans dix groupes variétaux du complexe Dioscorea cayenensis–rotundata. Cytologia 55:115–120Google Scholar
  51. Zoundjihekpon J, Hamon S, Tio-Touré B, Hamon P (1994) First controlled progenies checked by isozymic markers in cultivated yamsDioscorea cayenensis–rotundata. Theor Appl Genet 88:1011–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustapha Bousalem
    • 1
  • Gemma Arnau
    • 2
  • Isabelle Hochu
    • 3
  • Richard Arnolin
    • 1
  • Véronique Viader
    • 3
  • Sylvain Santoni
    • 3
  • Jacques David
    • 3
  1. 1.INRA-URPV, Domaine DuclosPetit-Bourg, GuadeloupeFrance
  2. 2.CIRAD-CAPetit Bourg, GuadeloupeFrance
  3. 3.UMR Diversité et Génomes des plantes CultivéesMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations