Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative analysis of genetic diversity in blackgram genotypes using RAPD and ISSR markers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers were used to study the DNA polymorphism in elite blackgram genotypes. A total of 25 random and 16 ISSR primers were used. Amplification of genomic DNA of the 18 genotypes, using RAPD analysis, yielded 104 fragments that could be scored, of which 44 were polymorphic, with an average of 1.8 polymorphic fragments per primer. Number of amplified fragments with random primers ranged from two (OPA-13) to nine (OPK-4) and varied in size from 200 bp to 2,500 bp. Percentage polymorphism ranged from 16.6% (OPK-7) to a maximum of 66.6% (OPE-5, OPH-2, and OPK-8), with an average of 42.7%. The 16 ISSR primers used in the study produced 101 bands across 18 genotypes, of which 55 were polymorphic. The number of amplified bands varied from two (ISSR 858) to ten (ISSR 810), with a size range of 200–2,200 bp. The average numbers of bands per primer and polymorphic bands per primer were 6.3 and 3.4, respectively. Percentage polymorphism ranged from 25% (ISSR 885) to 100% (ISSR 858), with an average percentage polymorphism of 57.5% across all the genotypes. The 3′-anchored primers based on poly(GA) and poly(AG) motifs produced high average polymorphisms of 54.98% and 58.32%, respectively. ISSR markers were more efficient than the RAPD assay, as they detected 57.4% polymorphic DNA markers in Vigna mungo as compared to 42.7% for RAPD markers. The Mantel test between the two Jaccard’s similarity matrices gave r =0.32, showing low correlation between RAPD- and ISSR-based similarities. Clustering of genotypes within groups was not similar when RAPD and ISSR derived dendrogram were compared, whereas the pattern of clustering of the genotypes remained more or less the same in ISSR and combined data of RAPD and ISSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajibade SR, Weeden NF, Chite SM (2000) Inter simple sequence repeat analysis of genetic relationships in the genus Vigna. Euphytica 111:47–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Guedira GL, Thompson JA, Nelson RL, Warburton ML (2000) Evaluation of genetic diversity of soybean introductions and North American ancestors using RAPD and SSR markers. Crop Sci 40:815–823

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA mini-preparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Depeiges A, Goubely C, Lenoir A, Cocherel S, Picard G, Raynal M, Grellet F, Delseny M (1995) Identification of the most represented repeat motifs in Arabidopsis thaliana microsatellite loci. Theor Appl Genet 91:160–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi SL, Gurtu S, Chandra S, Yuejin W, Nigam SN (2001) Assessment of genetic diversity among selected groundnut germplasm. I: RAPD analysis. Plant Breed 120:345–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez ME, Figueiras AM, Benito C (2002) The use of ISSR and RAPD marker for detecting DNA polymorphism, genotype identification and genetic diversity among barley cultivars with known origin. Theor Appl Genet 104:845–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaffor A, Sharif A, Ahmad Z, Zahid MA, Rabbani MA (2001) Genetic diversity in blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Field Crop Res 69:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoey BK, Crowe KR, Jones VM (1996) A phylogenetic analysis of Pisum sativum based on morphological characters and allozyme and RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 92:92–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaga AN, Tomooka N, Egawa Y, Hosaka K, Kamijima O (1996) Species relationships in subgenus Ceratotropis (genus Vigna) as revealed by RAPD analysis. Euphytica 88:17–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lakhanpaul S, Chadha S, Bhat KV (2000) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis in Indian mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] cultivars. Genetica 109:227–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe FJ, Legendre P (1992) Statistical significance of the matrix correlation coefficient for comparing independent phylogenetic trees. Syst Biol 41:378–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Loarce Y, Gallego R, Ferrer E (1996) A comparative analysis of genetic relationships between rye cultivars using RFLP and RAPD markers. Euphytica 88:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukoki L, Marechal R, Otoul E (1980) The wild ancestors of the cultivated beans Vigna radiata and Vigna mungo. Bull Jard Bot Nat Belg 28:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattioni C, Casasoli M, Gonzalez M, Ipinza R (2002) Comparison of ISSR and RAPD markers to characterize three Chilean Nothofagus species. Theor Appl Genet 104:1064–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mignouna HD, Ng NQ, Ikea J, Thottapilly G (1998) Genetic diversity in cowpea as revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. J Genet Breed 53:151–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaoka T, Ogihara Y (1997) Applicability of intersimple sequence repeat polymorphisms in wheat for use as DNA markers in comparison to RFLP and RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 94:597–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individual. Genetics 89: 583–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson AH, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME (1991) DNA markers in plant improvement. Adv Agron 46:39–90

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poehlman JM (1991) History, description, classification and origin. In: Poehlman JM (ed) The mungbean, West View, Boulder, pp 6–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Raina SN, Rani V, Kojima T, Ogihara Y, Singh KP, Devarumath RM (2001) RAPD and ISSR fingerprints as useful genetic markers for analysis of genetic diversity, varietal identification, and phylogenetic relationships in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars and wild species. Genome 44:763–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ranade R, Vaidya UJ, Kotwal SA, Bhagwat A, Gopalakrishna T (2000) Hybrid seed genotyping and plant varietal identification using DNA markers. In: DAE-BRNS symposium on the use of nuclear and molecular techniques in crop improvement, 6–8 December 2000, Mumbai, pp 338–345

  • Ratnaparkhe MB, Gupta VS, Venmurthy MR (1995) Genetic fingerprinting of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and wild relatives using RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 91:893–898

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MP, Sarla N, Siddiq EA (2002) Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plant breeding. Euphytica 128:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1990) NTSYS. Pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.02. Applied Biostatistics, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Santalla M, Power JB, Davey MR (1998) Genetic diversity in mungbean germplasm revealed by RAPD markers. Plant Breed 117:473–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Simioniuc D, Uptmoor R, Friedt W, Ordon F (2002) Genetic diversity and relationships among pea cultivars revealed by RAPDs and AFLPs. Plant Breed 121:429–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AK, Smart J, Simpson CE, Raina SN (1998) Genetic variation vis-a-vis molecular polymorphism in groundnut, Arachis hypogaea L. Genet Resour Crop Evol 45:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Reddy KS, Jawali N (2000) PCR analysis of mungbean genotypes using anchored simple sequence repeat primers. In: DAE-BRNS symposium on the use of nuclear and molecular techniques in crop Improvement, BARC, 6–8 December 2000, Mumbai, pp 359–369

  • Skroch PW, dos Santos JB, Nienhuis J (1992) Genetic relationships among Phaseolus vulgaris genotypes based on RAPD marker data. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 35:23–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller M, Beckmann JS (1983) Genetic polymorphism in varietal identification and genetic improvement. Theor Appl Genet 67:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnante G, Marangi A, Venora G, Pignone D (1997) Using RAPD markers to investigate genetic variation in chickpea. J Genet Breed 51:303–307

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, McCouch SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063–1066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalaski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yap IV, Nelson RJ (1996) Winboot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. IRRI Discussion Paper Series No. 14. International Rice Research Institute, Manila

  • Yee E, Kidwell KK, Sills GR, Lumpkin TA (1999) Diversity among selected Vigna angularis (Azuki) accessions on the basis of RAPD and AFLP markers. Crop Sci 39:268–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D (1994) Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20:176–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nuclear Agriculture and Biotechnology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai, 400085, India

    J. Souframanien & T. Gopalakrishna

Authors
  1. J. Souframanien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Gopalakrishna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Souframanien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Souframanien, J., Gopalakrishna, T. A comparative analysis of genetic diversity in blackgram genotypes using RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 109, 1687–1693 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1797-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1797-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation