Skip to main content

Population-based diallel analyses among nine historically recognized alfalfa germplasms

Abstract

Identification of heterotic groups and patterns among breeding populations provides fundamental information to help plant breeders more knowledgeably manipulate heterosis. A diallel analysis was conducted among nine alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) germplasms, commonly referred to as African, Chilean, Flemish, Indian, Ladak, M. falcata, M. varia, Peruvian, and Turkistan, which represent a significant proportion of the genetic diversity present in US cultivars. Heterotic responses were determined by evaluating forage yield of the germplasms and their 36 half-diallel hybrids in seeded plots that were harvested five times in each of 2 years. Commercially acceptable yields were obtained from some hybrids of unimproved parents, where at least one parent was adapted to the study environment. Variation among crosses was attributed primarily to general combining ability (GCA) effects; however, specific combining ability effects were also significant. GCA estimates for African, Chilean and Peruvian were positive, while those for Ladak, M. falcata, and M. varia were negative. Estimates for variety heterosis effects were positive for Peruvian and M. falcata and negative for Indian and M. varia. Significant mid-parent heterosis [(MPH) range of −21% to 55%] and high-parent heterosis [(HPH) range of −33% to 23%] was detected. M. falcata hybrids exhibited the highest MPH values. However, this likely reflects the poor yield of M. falcata per se in the study environment and consequently, low MPH values. Peruvian hybrids demonstrated the highest cross mean performance, significant positive MPH in all crosses, and positive HPH in five out of eight crosses. The results indicate that Peruvian should be recognized as a heterotic group. Alfalfa breeders may wish to explore opportunities for heterotic yield gains that are likely to exist in hybrids between the Peruvian germplasm and elite breeding populations, in particular, those adapted to the southwestern United States. MPH results suggest that alfalfa breeders may have capitalized on the heterotic response between Flemish and M. varia during past development of alfalfa synthetics adapted to the central and northern latitudes of the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Barnes DK, Bingham ET, Murphy RP, Hunt OJ, Beard DF, Skrdla WH, Teuber LR (1977) Alfalfa germplasm in the United States: genetic vulnerability, use, improvement, and maintenance. USDA–ARS Technical Bulletin 1571. US Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DK, Goplen BP, Baylor JE (1988) Highlights in the USA and Canada. In: Hanson AA (ed) Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement. Agronomy monographs, vol 29. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, pp 1–24

  • Besag J, Kempton R (1986) Statistical analysis of field experiments using neighboring plots. Biometrics 42:231–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham ET (1983) Maximizing hybrid vigour in tetraploid alfalfa. In: Nugent O (ed) Better crops for food. CIBA Foundation symposium 1997. Pitman, London, pp 130–143

  • Bingham ET (1993) Registration of WISFAL alfalfa (Medicago sativa ssp. falcata) tetraploid germplasm derived from diploids. Crop Sci 33:217–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummer EC (1999) Capturing heterosis in forage crop cultivar development. Crop Sci 39:943–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Busbice TH, Rawlings JO (1974) Combining ability in crosses within and between diverse groups of alfalfa introductions. Euphytica 23:86–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley JW, Busbice TH, Levings CS III (1969) Estimates of genetic variance in ‘Cherokee’ alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Crop Sci 9:228–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner CO, Eberhart SA (1966) Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics 22:439–452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groose RW, Bingham ET (1988) Combining ability differences between isogenic diploid and tetraploid alfalfa. Crop Sci 28:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University, Ames, pp 337–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RR (1983) Heterosis in population crosses of alfalfa. Crop Sci 23:48–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JB, Bingham ET (1994) Genetic improvement for yield and fertility of alfalfa cultivars representing different eras of breeding. Crop Sci 34:953–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell KK, Austin DF, Osborn TC (1994) RFLP evaluation of nine Medicago accessions representing the original germplasm sources for North American alfalfa cultivars. Crop Sci 34:230–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger AE, Gumber RK (1998) Overview of heterosis and heterotic groups in agronomic crops. In: Lamkey KR, Staub JE (eds) Concepts and breeding of heterosis in crop plants. CSSA Special Publication, vol 25. CSSA, Madison, pp 29–44

  • Murray LW, Ray IM, Dong H, Segovia-Lerma A (2003) Clarification and reevaluation of population-based diallel analyses: Gardner and Eberhart analyses II and III revisited. Crop Sci 43:1930–1937

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer TW, Bingham ET (1983) Improvement of fertility and herbage yield by selection within two-allele populations of tetraploid alfalfa. Crop Sci 23:633–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray IM, Townsend MS, Henning JA (1998) Variation for traits associated with yield, water-use efficiency, and canopy morphology among nine basic alfalfa germplasms. Crop Sci 38:1386–1390

    Google Scholar 

  • Riday H, Brummer EC (2002) Forage yield heterosis in alfalfa. Crop Sci 42:716–723

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1989) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, 4th edn, vol 2. SAS Institute, Cary

  • SAS Institute (1992) SAS Technical Report P-229, SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements, release 6.07. SAS Institute, Cary

  • Segovia-Lerma A, Cantrell RG, Conway JM, Ray IM (2003) AFLP-based assessment of genetic diversity among nine alfalfa germplasms using bulk DNA templates. Genome 46:51–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stroup WW, Baenziger PS, Multize DK (1994) Removing spatial variation from wheat yield trials: a comparison of methods. Crop Sci 34:62–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend MS, Henning JA, Currier CG (1994) The alfalfa catalog software package. Agron J 86:337–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield DR, Bingham ET (1995) Improvement in two-allele autotetraploid populations of alfalfa explained by accumulation of favorable alleles. Crop Sci 35:988–994

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research supported by the New Mexico Agriculture Experiment Station and a US Department of Agriculture grant (No. 99-34186-7496) to the Southwest Consortium on Plant Genetics and Water Resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. M. Ray.

Additional information

Communicated by H. Geiger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segovia-Lerma, A., Murray, L.W., Townsend, M.S. et al. Population-based diallel analyses among nine historically recognized alfalfa germplasms. Theor Appl Genet 109, 1568–1575 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1784-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1784-8

Keywords

  • General Combine Ability
  • Specific Combine Ability
  • Heterotic Group
  • General Combine Ability Effect
  • Forage Yield