Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kann die Progression eines Prostatakarzinoms während Active Surveillance durch serielle Magnetresonanztomographie verlässlich diagnostiziert werden?

Can progression of prostate cancer be reliably diagnosed using serial magnetic resonance imaging during active surveillance?

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Anderson BB, Oberlin DT, Razmaria AA et al (2016) Extraprostatic extension is extremely rare for contemporary Gleason score 6 prostate cancer. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.028

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bokhorst LP, Alberts AR, Rannikko A et al (2015) Compliance rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocol and disease reclassification in noncompliers. Eur Urol 68:814–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dieffenbacher S, Nyarangi-Dix J, Giganti F et al (2019) Standardized magnetic resonance imaging reporting using the prostate cancer radiological estimation of change in sequential evaluation criteria and magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion with transperineal saturation biopsy to select men. Eur Urol Focus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giganti F, Kirkham A, Allen C et al (2020) Update on multiparametric prostate MRI during active surveillance: current and future trends and role of the PRECISE recommendations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.20.23985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giganti F, Moore CM, Punwani S et al (2018) The natural history of prostate cancer on MRI: lessons from an active surveillance cohort. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-018-0058-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giganti F, Stabile A, Stavrinides V et al (2020) Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hettiarachchi D, Geraghty R, Rice P et al (2021) Can the use of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging during active surveillance of prostate cancer avoid the need for prostate biopsies?—A systematic diagnostic test accuracy review. Eur Urol Oncol 4:426–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2020.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie der AWMF (2021) S3-Leitlinie Prostatakarzinom. Version 6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R et al (2017) What is the negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer at biopsy ? A systematic review and meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology prostate cancer guidelines panel. Eur Urol 72:250–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore CM, Giganti F, Albertsen P et al (2017) Reporting magnetic resonance imaging in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: the PRECISE recommendations—a report of a European School of Oncology task force. Eur Urol 71:648–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moschini M, Carroll PR, Eggener SE et al (2017) Low-risk prostate cancer: identification, management, and outcomes. Eur Urol 72:238–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rajwa P, Pradere B, Quhal F et al (2021) Reliability of serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect prostate cancer progression during active surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urologische Universitätsklinik, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland

    Analena Elisa Handke, Boris Alexander Hadaschik &  Jan Philipp Radtke

  2. Martini-Klinik am UKE, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Markus Graefen

  3. Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland

    Tim Ullrich & Lars Schimmöller

  4. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, USA

    Andreas Wibmer

  5. Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, Großbritannien

    Francesco Giganti

  6. Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, Großbritannien

    Francesco Giganti

  7. Abteilung Radiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Jan Philipp Radtke

Authors
  1. Analena Elisa Handke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Graefen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tim Ullrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andreas Wibmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Boris Alexander Hadaschik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Francesco Giganti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lars Schimmöller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jan Philipp Radtke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Philipp Radtke.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A.E. Handke, M. Graefen, T. Ullrich, A. Wibmer, B.A. Hadaschik, F. Giganti, L. Schimmöller und J.P. Radtke geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Handke, A.E., Graefen, M., Ullrich, T. et al. Kann die Progression eines Prostatakarzinoms während Active Surveillance durch serielle Magnetresonanztomographie verlässlich diagnostiziert werden?. Urologe 60, 1594–1597 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01676-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01676-5

Search

Navigation