Skip to main content
Log in

Penile Rehabilitation nach nervsparender radikaler Prostatektomie

Ein Strategievergleich

Penile rehabilitation after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

A comparison of strategies

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bitzer EM, Grobe TG, Neusser S et al (2012) Barmer GEK Report Krankenhaus 2012. In: Barmer GEK (Hrsg) Schwerpunktthema: Die akut-stationäre Versorgung des Prostatakarzinoms. Barmer GEK, Schwäbisch-Gmünd

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chambers SK, Chung E, Wittert G et al (2017) Erectile dysfunction, masculinity, and psychosocial outcomes: a review of the experiences of men after prostate cancer treatment. Transl Androl Urol 6:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA et al (2020) Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol 77:38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Downing A, Wright P, Hounsome L et al (2019) Quality of life in men living with advanced and localised prostate cancer in the UK: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 20:436–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hedestig O, Sandman P‑O, Tomic R et al (2005) Living after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. A qualitative analysis of patient narratives. Acta Oncol 44:679–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaiho Y, Yamashita S, Ito A et al (2016) Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor administered immediately after radical prostatectomy temporarily increases the need for incontinence pads, but improves final continence status. Investig Clin Urol 57:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JK, Assel M, Thong AE et al (2015) Unexpected long-term improvements in urinary and erectile function in a large cohort of men with self-reported outcomes following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 68:899–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin AL, Huelin R, Wilson D et al (2013) A systematic review assessing the economic impact of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 10:1389–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moses RA, Anderson RE, Kim J et al (2019) Erectile dysfunction management after failed phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitor trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Transl Androl Urol 8:387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson CJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA et al (2013) Back to baseline: erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy from the patients’ perspective. J Sex Med 10:1636–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Philippou YA, Jung JH, Steggall MJ et al (2018) Penile rehabilitation for postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012414.pub2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Polito M, D’anzeo G, Conti A et al (2012) Erectile rehabilitation with intracavernous alprostadil after radical prostatectomy: refusal and dropout rates. BJU Int 110:E954–E957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rabbani F, Schiff J, Piecuch M et al (2010) Time course of recovery of erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: does anyone recover after 2 years? J Sex Med 7:3984–3990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanders S, Pedro LW, Bantum EO et al (2006) Couples surviving prostate cancer: long-term intimacy needs and concerns following treatment. Clin J Oncol Nurs 10:503–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schauer I, Keller E, Müller A et al (2015) Have rates of erectile dysfunction improved within the past 17 years after radical prostatectomy? A systematic analysis of the control arms of prospective randomized trials on penile rehabilitation. Andrology 3:661–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Terrier JE, Masterson M, Mulhall JP et al (2018) Decrease in Intercourse Satisfaction in Men Who Recover Erections After Radical Prostatectomy. J Sex Med 15:1133–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jochen Heß.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

J. Heß gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heß, J. Penile Rehabilitation nach nervsparender radikaler Prostatektomie. Urologe 60, 1199–1201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01554-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01554-0

Navigation