Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rekonstruktive Möglichkeiten bei der Induratio penis plastica

Reconstructive possibilities for Peyronie’s disease

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die operative Therapie der Induratio penis plastica (IPP) umfasst ein mehrstufiges Vorgehen mit steigender Invasivität. Hierbei ist neben der genauen Kenntnis der zur Verfügung stehenden operativen Verfahren, die Indikationsstellung und Aufklärung der Patienten, wie auch sonst, von äußerster Wichtigkeit.

Die Unzufriedenheit vieler Patienten mit den postoperativen Ergebnissen resultiert v. a. aus falschen Erwartungen und positivistischen Darstellungen. Wenn es gelingt, dies zu vermeiden und die vorhandenen operativen Verfahren individuell richtig anzuwenden, sind auch diese „komplexen Patienten“ sehr erfolgreich zu therapieren.

Abstract

The surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease involves a multistage procedure with increasing invasiveness. In addition to precise knowledge about the existing surgical treatment procedures, the indication and the informed consent process of the patient is extremely important. The dissatisfaction with the surgical results for many patients is due to false expectations and positivistic representations. If we can avoid this and make the right decisions during surgery, even these difficult-to-treat patients can be treated successfully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7

Literatur

  1. Sperling H, Weidner W (2015) Operative Therapie der Induratio penis plastica. Urologe 54:648–653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hatzimouratidis K, Giuliano F, Moncada I, Muneer A (2017) Salonia: EAU-guidelines on penile curvature. EAU Guidelines 62:543–552

    Google Scholar 

  3. Essed E, Schroeder FH (1985) New surgical treatment for Peyronie disease. Urology 25(6):582–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nesbit RM (1965) Congenital curvature of the phallus:report of three cases with desription of corrective operation. J Urol 93:230–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gholami SS, Lue TF (2002) Correction of penile curvature using the 16-dot plication technique: a review of 132 patients. J Urol 167(5):2066–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giammusso B, Burrello M, Branchina A, Nicolosi F, Motta M (2004) Modified corporoplasty for ventral penile curvature: description of the technique and initial results. J Urol 171(3):1209–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schneider T, Sperling H, Schenck M, Schneider U, Rübben H (2003) Treatment of penile curvature-how to combine the advantages of simple plication and the Nesbit-procedure by superficial excision of the tunica albuginea. World J Urol 20(6):350–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hauck EW, Bschleipfer T, Diemer T, Manning M, Schroeder-Printzen I, Weidner W (2002) Long-term results of plaque thinning with carbide burs, small incisions and venous grafting for correcting complex penile curvature in Peyronie’s disease: poor results of an “ideal” approach. J Urol 167(5):2070–2073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Terrier J, Tal R, Nelson J (2018) Penile sensory changes after plaque incision and grafting—surgery for Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 15:1497

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chung E, Wang R, Ralph D et al (2018) A worldwide survey on Peyronies’s disease surgical practise patterns among surgeons. J Sex Med 15:568–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Backhaus BO, Müller SC, Albers P (2003) Corporoplasty for advanced Peyronie’s disease using venous and/or dermis patch grafting: new surgical technique and long-term patient satisfaction. J Urol 169(3):981–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Montorsi F, Salonia A, Maga T, Bua L, Guazzoni G, Barbieri L, Barbagli G, Chiesa R, Pizzini G, Rigatti P (2000) Evidence based assessment of long-term results of plaque incision and vein grafting for Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 163(6):1704–1708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwarzer JU, Steinfatt H (2012) Tunica albuginea underlap—a new modification of the Nesbit procedure: description of the technique and preliminary results. J Sex Med 9(11):2970–2974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Levine LA, Estrada CR (2003) Human cadaveric pericardial graft for the surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 170(6 Pt 1):2359–2362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lahme S, Götz T, Bichler KH (2002) Collagen fleece for defect coverage following plaque excision in patients with Peyronie’s disease. Eur Urol 41(4):401–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chung E, Clendinning E, Lessard L, Brock G (2011) Five-year follow-up of peyronie’s graft surgery: ourcomes and patient satisfaction. J Sex Med 8:594–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Flores S, Choi J, Alex B, Mulhall JP (2011) Erectile dysfunction after plaque incision and grafting: short-term assessment of incidence and predictors. J Sex Med 8:2031–2037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR 2nd (2001) Long-term followup of treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 165(3):825–829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Montorsi F, Salonia A, Maga T, Colombo R, Cestari A, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P (2001) Reconfiguration of the severely fibrotic penis with a penile implant. J Urol 166(5):1782–1786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hatzichristodoulou G (2018) The PICS technique: a novel approach for residual curvature correction during penile prosthesis implantation in patients with severe Peyronie’s disease using the collagen fleece TachoSil. J Sex Med 15:416–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chung PH, Scott JF, Morey AF (2014) High patient satisfaction of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion with synchronous penile plication for erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 11(6):1593–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urologische Klinik, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Viersener Str. 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland

    Herbert Sperling

Authors
  1. Herbert Sperling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herbert Sperling.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

H. Sperling gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden vom Autor keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sperling, H. Rekonstruktive Möglichkeiten bei der Induratio penis plastica. Urologe 59, 426–431 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-020-01154-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-020-01154-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation