Skip to main content
Log in

Aktuelle Aspekte zur Steintherapie im Kindesalter

Current aspects in pediatric urolithiasis treatment

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Im Vergleich zu Erwachsenen ist das Harnsteinleiden bei Kindern selten (1–2 % aller Harnsteine treten im Kindesalter auf). Grundsätzlich können heute alle für den Erwachsenen zur Verfügung stehenden Behandlungsmethoden auch bei Kindern angewandt werden. Aufgrund einiger Besonderheiten der Anatomie und Physiologie des kindlichen Harntrakts ist die Differentialindikation der verfügbaren Behandlungsverfahren jedoch anders als bei Erwachsenen. Asymptomatische Nierenkonkremente werden in der Regel nicht behandelt, sondern beobachtet. Bei Kindern gehen mehr Steine spontan ab als bei Erwachsenen. Wenn ein Spontanabgang nicht möglich ist oder nicht stattfindet, kommen nicht-invasive und minimal-invasive Verfahren zum Einsatz. Die extrakorporale Stoßwellenlithotripsie (ESWL) ist bei Kindern auch in Zeiten der modernen Endourologie das Mittel der Wahl für die meisten Steinsituationen. Endoskopische Verfahren können aber auch im Kindesalter, selbst bei kleinsten Kindern, sicher zum Einsatz kommen. Bei größeren und aus Zystin oder Whewellit bestehenden Nierensteinen ist die perkutane Nephrolitholapaxie (PCNL) die Therapie der ersten Wahl, bei distalen Harnleitersteinen die Ureterorenoskopie (URS). Laparoskopische und offene Steinoperationen sind Einzelfällen vorbehalten, insbesondere bei operationsbedürftigen Begleitpathologien. Blasensteine werden transurethral oder perkutan therapiert.

Abstract

Compared with adults, urolithiasis is quite rare in children (1–2% of all urinary stones occur during childhood). In principle, all therapy modalities for adults can also be used in children. However, due to some anatomic and functional peculiarities in children, the differential indication for the various treatment modalities differ. As a rule, asymptomatic renal stones are not treated but observed. More urinary stones pass spontaneously in children compared with adults. If spontaneous passage is not possible or does not occur, noninvasive and minimally invasive techniques are indicated. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the therapy of choice in most instances. Today, endoscopic techniques, however, can be safely used even in very small infants. For larger renal stones and those consisting of cysteine or whewellite, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the therapy of choice, and for distal ureteral stones ureteroscopy is the method of choice. Laparoscopic and open surgery are reserved for very rare cases, especially with concomitant pathologies. Bladder calculi are treated by transurethral or suprapubic lithotripsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Abid AF, Hussein NS, Mahdi BA (2019) Factors that affect outcome of pediatric shock waves lithotripsy with sedoanalgesia. Urol Ann 11(1):72–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barreto L, Jung JH, Abdelrahim A et al (2019) Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD10784

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayne CE, Cardona-Grau D, Hsieh MH (2017) Featuring: use of medical expulsive therapy in children. J Pediatr Urol 13(4):418–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berrettini A, Boeri L, Montanari E et al (2018) Retrograde intrarenal surgery using ureteral access sheaths is a safe and effective treatment for renal stones in children weighing 〈20 kg. J Pediatr Urol 14(1):59.e1–59.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, Korn S (1985) Urolithiasis im Kindesalter (Urolithiasis in childhood). Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 133(5):256–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bodakçi MN, Penbegul N, Dağgülli M et al (2015) Ultrasound-guided micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients with kidney stones. Int J Urol 22(8):773–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brinkmann OA, Griehl A, Kuwertz-Bröking E et al (2001) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children. Efficacy, complications and long-term follow-up. Eur Urol 39(5):591–597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Campschroer T, Zhu X, Vernooij RWM et al (2018) α‑blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteric stones: a Cochrane systematic review. BJU Int 122(6):932–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan KH, Whittam BM, Krambeck A et al (2019) Cost-effectiveness analysis of the management of distal Ureteral stones in children. Urology 127:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dogan HS, Onal B, Satar N et al (2011) Factors affecting complication rates of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in children: results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by Pediatric Stone Disease Study Group of Turkish Pediatric Urology Society. J Urol 186(3):1035–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elderwy AA, Kurkar A, Hussein A et al (2014) Dissolution therapy versus shock wave lithotripsy for radiolucent renal stones in children: a prospective study. J Urol 191(5 Suppl):1491–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellison JS, Merguerian PA, Fu BC et al (2017) Use of medical expulsive therapy in children: an assessment of nationwide practice patterns and outcomes. J Pediatr Urol 13(5):509.e1–509.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farouk A, Tawfick A, Shoeb M et al (2018) Is mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric age group in borderline stones? a randomized prospective study. World J Urol 36(7):1139–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gokce MI, Telli O, Akinci A et al (2016) Effect of Prestenting on success and complication rates of Ureterorenoscopy in pediatric population. J Endourol 30(8):850–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta N, Ko J, Matlaga BR et al (2014) Ureteroscopy for treatment of upper urinary tract stones in children: technical considerations. Curr Urol Rep 15(5):407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Habib EI, Morsi HA, Elsheemy MS et al (2013) Effect of size and site on the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of proximal urinary stones in children. J Pediatr Urol 9(3):323–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoppe B, Kemper MJ (2010) Diagnostic examination of the child with urolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis. Pediatr Nephrol 25(3):403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL et al (2001) Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol 40(6):619–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Newman DM, Coury T, Lingeman JE et al (1986) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy experience in children. J Urol 136(1 Pt 2):238–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Park HK, Kim JH, Min GE et al (2019) Change of trends in the treatment modality for pediatric Nephrolithiasis: retrospective analysis of a US-based insurance claims database. J Endourol 33(7):614–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pelit ES, Atis G, Kati B et al (2017) Comparison of mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and retrograde Intrarenal surgery in preschool-aged children. Urology 101:21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pietrow PK, Pope JC, Adams MC et al (2002) Clinical outcome of pediatric stone disease. J Urol 167(2 Pt 1):670–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Samad L, Aquil S, Zaidi Z (2006) Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy: setting new frontiers. BJU Int 97(2):359–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Seitz C, Bach T, Bader M et al (2019) Aktualisierung der S2k-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik, Therapie und Metaphylaxe der Urolithiasis (AWMF Registernummer 043-025) : Was ist neu? (Update of the 2Sk guidelines on the diagnostics, treatment and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF register number 043-025) : What is new?). Urologe 58(11):1304–1312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Silay MS, Ellison JS, Tailly T et al (2017) Update on urinary stones in children: current and future concepts in surgical treatment and shockwave Lithotripsy. Eur Urol Focus 3(2–3):164–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Strohmaier WL (2015) Imaging in pediatric urolithiasis-what’s the best choice? Transl Pediatr 4(1):36–40

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sultan S, Umer AS, Ahmed B et al (2019) Update on surgical management of pediatric Urolithiasis. Front Pediatr 7:252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Velázquez N, Zapata D, Wang H‑HS et al (2015) Medical expulsive therapy for pediatric urolithiasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol 11(6):321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yuruk E, Tuken M, Gonultas S et al (2017) Retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of pediatric cystine stones. J Pediatr Urol 13(5):487.e1–487.e5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zeng G, Jia J, Zhao Z et al (2012) Treatment of renal stones in infants: comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Res 40(5):599–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. L. Strohmaier.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

W. L. Strohmaier gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen und Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strohmaier, W.L. Aktuelle Aspekte zur Steintherapie im Kindesalter. Urologe 59, 289–293 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-020-01132-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-020-01132-w

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation