Skip to main content
Log in

Vergleich von transperitoneal laparoskopischer und offener Pyeloplastik bei Kindern

Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A et al (2014) Robot assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 65:430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang Y, Wu Y, Shan W et al (2015) An updated meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:4922

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. H. Rösch.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

F. Vauth und . W. H. Rösch geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vauth, F., Rösch, W.H. Vergleich von transperitoneal laparoskopischer und offener Pyeloplastik bei Kindern. Urologe 56, 1034–1035 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-017-0441-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-017-0441-1

Navigation